CI-users

ci-users@lists.centos.org

1 participants
421 discussions

cannot get active node
by Vladimir Benes 21 Apr '20

21 Apr '20

Hi all, any idea where is the issue? by request for 8-stream box I am getting an error: [networkmanager@slave03 ~]$ cico node get --release 8-stream Starting new HTTP connection (1): admin.ci.centos.org Resetting dropped connection: admin.ci.centos.org The requested operation failed as no inventory is available. Thanks, Vladimir

3 3

SCL containers failed with message: nss_wrapper package is missing.
by Petr Hracek 20 Apr '20

20 Apr '20

Dear CI Users, RHSCL team triggers nightly build testing of RHSCL images for CentOS. Unfortunately it failed on: ```bash Step 6/12 : RUN yum install -y centos-release-scl-rh && ( [ "rh-${NAME}${NODEJS_VERSION}" != "${NODEJS_SCL}" ] && yum remove -y ${NODEJS_SCL}\* || : ) && INSTALL_PKGS="rh-nodejs${NODEJS_VERSION} rh-nodejs${NODEJS_VERSION}-npm rh-nodejs${NODEJS_VERSION}-nodejs-nodemon nss_wrapper" && ln -s /usr/lib/node_modules/nodemon/bin/nodemon.js /usr/bin/nodemon && yum install -y --setopt=tsflags=nodocs $INSTALL_PKGS && rpm -V $INSTALL_PKGS && yum -y clean all --enablerepo='*' ---> Running in 73e8e1473359 [91m [0mLoaded plugins: fastestmirror, ovl Determining fastest mirrors * base: mirrors.greenmountainaccess.net * centos-sclo-rh: mirror.umd.edu * centos-sclo-sclo: repo.miserver.it.umich.edu * extras: mirror.es.its.nyu.edu * updates: mirror.vtti.vt.edu Package centos-release-scl-rh-2-3.el7.centos.noarch already installed and latest version Nothing to do Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, ovl Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirrors.greenmountainaccess.net * centos-sclo-rh: mirror.umd.edu * centos-sclo-sclo: repo.miserver.it.umich.edu * extras: mirror.es.its.nyu.edu * updates: mirror.vtti.vt.edu Package rh-nodejs10-npm-6.13.4-10.19.0.1.el7.x86_64 already installed and latest version No package nss_wrapper available. Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package rh-nodejs10.x86_64 0:3.2-3.el7 will be installed ---> Package rh-nodejs10-nodejs-nodemon.noarch 0:1.18.3-3.el7 will be installed --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: rh-nodejs10 x86_64 3.2-3.el7 centos-sclo-rh 7.0 k rh-nodejs10-nodejs-nodemon noarch 1.18.3-3.el7 centos-sclo-rh 941 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 2 Packages Total download size: 948 k Installed size: 4.0 M Downloading packages: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 2.3 MB/s | 948 kB 00:00 Running transaction check Running transaction test Transaction test succeeded Running transaction Installing : rh-nodejs10-3.2-3.el7.x86_64 1/2 Installing : rh-nodejs10-nodejs-nodemon-1.18.3-3.el7.noarch 2/2 Verifying : rh-nodejs10-nodejs-nodemon-1.18.3-3.el7.noarch 1/2 Verifying : rh-nodejs10-3.2-3.el7.x86_64 2/2 Installed: rh-nodejs10.x86_64 0:3.2-3.el7 rh-nodejs10-nodejs-nodemon.noarch 0:1.18.3-3.el7 Complete! package nss_wrapper is not installed The command '/bin/sh -c yum install -y centos-release-scl-rh && ( [ "rh-${NAME}${NODEJS_VERSION}" != "${NODEJS_SCL}" ] && yum remove -y ${NODEJS_SCL}\* || : ) && INSTALL_PKGS="rh-nodejs${NODEJS_VERSION} rh-nodejs${NODEJS_VERSION}-npm rh-nodejs${NODEJS_VERSION}-nodejs-nodemon nss_wrapper" && ln -s /usr/lib/node_modules/nodemon/bin/nodemon.js /usr/bin/nodemon && yum install -y --setopt=tsflags=nodocs $INSTALL_PKGS && rpm -V $INSTALL_PKGS && yum -y clean all --enablerepo='*'' returned a non-zero code: 1 make[1]: *** [10] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/daily_scl_tests/s2i-nodejs-container' ``` Do you know, where it could be a problem? Did you remove nss_wrapper from CentOS repositories? -- Petr Hracek email: phracek(a)redhat.com IRC phracek #brno #software-collections #tft #core-services #core-services-db GPG 0xA9FC9AC4 Red Hat Czech s.r.o, Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic

3 3

annobin not matching gcc
by Vladimir Benes 16 Apr '20

16 Apr '20

Hi all, any idea why is annobin not matching gcc in 8-stream? NetworkManager compilation ends like this: checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler works... no configure: error: in `/root/nm- build/NetworkManager/contrib/fedora/rpm/NetworkManager.20200416- 093131.EsV6WT/BUILD/NetworkManager-1.25.0': configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mwThzy (%build) downgrading annobin fixes the issue. Can we somehow make sure these two are in sync all the time? Thanks, Vladimir

1 0

Issues with scl
by Katerina Foniok 15 Apr '20

15 Apr '20

Hello guys, we are often having problems with Jenkins job [1] where sometimes we are not able to use scl command. It just says `scl: command not found`. We are not sure how we could solve this problem or if it is some problem with nodes and you could help us with that? The job is running on devtools-ci-slave04. Thank you for your time. Have a nice day, Katka [1] https://ci.centos.org/job/devtools-rh-che-periodic-prod-1a/2340/console

3 4

Availability of ppc64le and aarch64 nodes in cico
by Vipul Siddharth 24 Mar '20

24 Mar '20

Hi folks, We have added ppc64le and aarch64 nodes for both 8 and 8-stream in the cico-pool that you can checkout through python-cicoclient Example: `cico node get --arch ppc64le --release 8 --flavor medium` The pool count[0] has been updated accordingly. The number is very limited as of now due to infrastructure limitations but we will monitor the usage of the nodes and will adjust the pool count that suits the best. If you notice any problem, do let me know here or on #centos-ci@Freenode Thank you, stay safe and wash hands :) [0] https://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/CI/Duffy -- Vipul Siddharth He/His/Him Fedora | CentOS CI Infrastructure Team Red Hat w: vipul.dev

1 0

No space left on device
by Katerina Foniok 04 Mar '20

04 Mar '20

Hello guys, our tests failed on `No space left on device` [1]. Could you please take a look at that? Thank you for your effort. Have a nice day, Katka [1] https://ci.centos.org/view/Devtools/job/devtools-rh-che-rh-che-prcheck-dev.…

5 6

Missing recent builds
by František Šumšal 07 Feb '20

07 Feb '20

Hello, I just noticed that many of the recent builds from our Jenkins slave[0] were unexpectedly removed, even though they shouldn't be, according to the retention policy (which is set to keep builds for 90 days in all affected jobs). As it's not the first time this happened I'm curious if there's some other retention policy we should be aware of, as this is kind of annoying - the missing jobs are a few days old, some of them failed, but apart from not being able to check the logs, we can't even reschedule them, because they don't exist anymore. Note: the retention policy is currently set unnecessarily high - that's a remnant from the last time this issue occurred, as I thought Jenkins is simply miscalculating the retention policy configuration. Cutting it to 45 or even 30 days should be an issue to conserve space on the master. PS: sorry for the double post, Vipul, I accidentally dropped the ML from To: Thank you, Frantisek [0] systemd-ci-slave01 -- PGP Key ID: 0xFB738CE27B634E4B

2 3

URGENT - https://ci.centos.org/ is down
by Maor Friedman 26 Jan '20

26 Jan '20

Hello, https://ci.centos.org/ is returning a 502 Bad Gateway. Is there anyone that can look into this? Thanks, -- Maor Friedman Senior Software Engineer, Application SRE team, Service Delivery Red Hat maor(a)redhat.com

2 4

Dirty nodes
by Katerina Foniok 24 Jan '20

24 Jan '20

Hello guys, it seems that data are not cleaned correctly from the nodes. Some of our tests are failing on that. E.g. https://ci.centos.org/view/Devtools/job/devtools-rh-che-periodic-prod-2aPro… where the folder with the logs already exists. This job was run on devtools-ci-slave04. Thank you for your time. Have a nice day! Katka Foniok

4 9

CentOS 7/8 OpenSSL / FIPS 140-2 / FedRAMP
by Salman Baset 19 Jan '20

19 Jan '20

Hello, I was wondering if the source code for OpenSSL (1.1.*) in CentOS 7 and 8 is exactly the same as Red Hat and thus would be considered equivalent from a FIPS 140-2 cert standpoint. See the RHEL 7.0 OpenSSL FIPS certificate below. https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/cryptographic-module-validation-program/Cert… Also, has anyone recently used Cent OS 7 with OpenSSL EL rpm (1.1.*) to successfully obtain FedRAMP Moderate authorization or was it necessary to switch to Red Hat? Thanks Salman

1 0

← Newer
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
...
43
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

CI-users