I'm not using Ansible inside CI yet, but I remember having had to adapt some 1.9 playbooks for 2.x. [1]

Perhaps also worth mentioning, Ansible 2.2.1.0 fixed CVE-2016-9587, CVE-2016-8647, CVE-2016-9587 and CVE-2016-8647 (the first is about a compromised remote system being able to run commands on the Ansible controller - I think 1.9 is also vulnerable [2]). Unless we can afford to quickly backport such security fixes, wouldn't it be better to use the EPEL version everywhere inside CentOS?

Regards,

Laurențiu

[1] https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/porting_guide_2.0.html
[2] https://lwn.net/Articles/711357/

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 7:49 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms@redhat.com> wrote:

Worth mentioning that 1.9.x and 2.0.x are officially unsupported and
unmaintained [1].

[1]: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ansible-devel/6-6FdxZ94kc

David Moreau Simard
Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO

dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Brian Stinson <brian@bstinson.com> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> We've been shipping Ansible 1.9.x on the slaves for a while now. Do any
> of you have use-cases to stay pinned to such an old version?
>
> We'd like to update at least to the 2.1 branch (2.2 has some
> templating/variable-quoting gotchas) in the near future.
>
> Questions, comments?
>
> --Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ci-users mailing list
> Ci-users@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
_______________________________________________
Ci-users mailing list
Ci-users@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users

_______________________________________________
Ci-users mailing list
Ci-users@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users