Hey,

I took a first stab at this, I think it makes sense ? It looks like it
works on my end.
The spec file is here:
https://github.com/dmsimard/python-cicoclient/blob/master/python-cicoclient.spec

I made it build through copr as well:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/dmsimard/python-cicoclient/build/139669/


David Moreau Simard
Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO

dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 5:33 PM, David Moreau Simard <dms@redhat.com> wrote:
> In the meantime you have the next best thing on PyPi but I do want to
> package it as rpm eventually.
>
> Here, I just formalized it in the first-ever issue on github [1]
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/dmsimard/python-cicoclient/issues/1
>
> David Moreau Simard
> Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO
>
> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab@centos.org> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 13/11/15 21:19, David Moreau Simard wrote:
>>> Heya,
>>>
>>> I read the docs, the mailing lists and glanced over the various
>>> scripts out there and was convinced there had to be a better way
>>> than using curl to communicate with admin.ci.centos.org.
>>>
>>> Introducing python-cicoclient: - Github:
>>> https://github.com/dmsimard/python-cicoclient - PyPi:
>>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-cicoclient/ - Docs:
>>> http://python-cicoclient.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
>>>
>>> I broke down this package in three main components: - client.py:
>>> Abstracts the http stuff - wrapper.py: Uses client.py to wrap
>>> around the available API calls and provide a consistent user
>>> experience - shell.py/cli.py: Provide a CLI interface around
>>> wrapper.py
>>>
>>> It can be used as both a CLI client with the provided 'cico'
>>> binary but also as a library - you can easily import wrapper and
>>> roll your own thing.
>>>
>>> Feel free to use it, contribute and provide feedback !
>>>
>>> Please note that as of right now, there is a problem with the
>>> "node get" command due to an upstream bug, documented here:
>>> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9748 Please do not use "node
>>> get" until this bug is fixed :)
>>>
>>> David Moreau Simard Senior Software Engineer | Openstack RDO
>>>
>>> dmsimard = [irc, github, twitter]
>>
>> Looks very promising !
>> Wondering if then we can have a .spec, and build/deploy it as rpm
>> within the CI env, on the jenkins slave nodes, so that people would
>> have an alternative.
>>
>>
>> - --
>> Fabian Arrotin
>> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
>> gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAlZHB5YACgkQnVkHo1a+xU7xoQCdH8CQynVnleWNZVGNa08uIRs3
>> 05gAoITFkfK+TkaFJEPs7yoOCq34xU7D
>> =Nmgd
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ci-users mailing list
>> Ci-users@centos.org
>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users
_______________________________________________
Ci-users mailing list
Ci-users@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ci-users