I meant the extra centos tag added to the 5.0 built versio of the package.<br>I do understand the problem posed by the 5.1 version of the package being out before 5.1 ;-)<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/1/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">
Johnny Hughes</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:johnny@centos.org">johnny@centos.org</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:<br>&gt; I think for the future the packaged should be releases el5_0.centos<br>&gt; built against 5.0 tree, and then when 5.1 is available, rebuilt as el5_1<br>&gt; against the 5.1 tree.<br><br>
That is what upstream is doing ... the problem is, they are releasing<br>el5_1 stuff, built against the el5_1 tree _BUT_ as of now, there _IS_NO_<br>el5_1 tree.<br><br>That is what leaves CentOS without the ability to build these things as
<br>they are currently being built upstream.<br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>CentOS-devel mailing list<br><a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel">
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>