On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Steven Crothers <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:steven.crothers@gmail.com">steven.crothers@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

So this issue stopped QA from syncing to &quot;internal&quot; mirrors then on time? So now that it&#39;s complete and showing as fixed, what are the odds of us seeing a sync in July?<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><br>

<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Shawn Thompson <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:superfox436@gmail.com" target="_blank">superfox436@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">If <a href="http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/85" target="_blank">http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/85</a> is holding up things, just<br>



throw in the Fedora boilerplate.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
~Shawn<br></font></blockquote><div> </div><div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>No, this issue wasn&#39;t holding anything up; it was one of many things getting fixed.  For example, some missing dependencies / library mis-matches,  and going through general QA tests such as those outlined here: <a href="http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/notebook">http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/notebook</a></div>

<div><br></div><div>-Jeff</div></div>