On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Florian La Roche
<Florian.LaRoche@gmx.net> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:44:00PM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Am 28.12.10 10:37, schrieb Filip Bartmann:
>
> > So why is CentOS development so closed? Why users can't have alphas,
> > or betas of this distro and must use some other rebuild as Scientific
> > Linux?
>
> One of the reasons is the sheer volume. CentOS is in use (wild educated
> guess here) on a massively larger scale than SL is. Just getting out the
For RHEL5 I have preferred CentOS as it stays more closely to upstream,
but given the number of very special cases that need to be considered for
the rebuild, I hope CentOS will catch all items that get reported by the
open Sientific Linux devel/test cycle. (This won't be too easy...)
regards,
Florian La Roche