On Jul 6, 2015 7:34 PM, "Jason Brooks" <jbrooks@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lokesh Mandvekar" <lsm5@fedoraproject.org>
> > To: centos-devel@centos.org
> > Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 2:17:04 PM
> > Subject: [CentOS-devel] Including rkt in virt7 - yay/nay?
> >
> > Wondering if people would be ok with including rkt in virt7 SIG repos.
> > some folks gave this a yay on IRC, but reaching out to the mailing list as
> > well for more votes.
>
> +1

+1 here too

>
> >
> > rkt is _not_ in fedora yet and including it would also imply including
> > systemd >= 220 in virt7 as it isn't present in base CentOS.
> >
> > All the gory detail around rkt packaging for fedora can be found here:
> > https://github.com/coreos/rkt/issues/686 . The main
> > pending issue that fedora won't agree to right now is
> > RE: installing the stage1 rootfs tarball at rpm install time.
> >
> > WIP rpm files are here: https://github.com/fedora-cloud/rkt-rpm/ . I've been
> > adding these to my copr repo here:
> > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lsm5/rkt/ . markllama and lalatenduM
> > might have something to add to this.
> > --
> > Lokesh
> > Freenode, OFTC: lsm5
> > GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS-devel mailing list
> > CentOS-devel@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>