I think for the future the packaged should be releases el5_0.centos built against 5.0 tree, and then when 5.1 is available, rebuilt as el5_1 against the 5.1 tree.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/1/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">
Matthew Miller</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:mattdm@mattdm.org">mattdm@mattdm.org</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 12:55:12PM +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote:<br>&gt; For the time being, we released with el5_0, but I would really vote for<br>&gt; rebuild with 5.1 ( so we get the linking and stuff right, and can<br>
&gt; actually rpmverify for an exact match ) and release that rebuilt package<br>&gt; when we can.<br><br>+1<br><br>--<br>Matthew Miller&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="mailto:mattdm@mattdm.org">mattdm@mattdm.org</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;<a href="http://mattdm.org/">
http://mattdm.org/</a>&gt;<br>Boston University Linux&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;------&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;<a href="http://linux.bu.edu/">http://linux.bu.edu/</a>&gt;<br>_______________________________________________<br>CentOS-devel mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org">CentOS-devel@centos.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel">http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel</a><br></blockquote></div><br>