On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu> wrote:

Karanbir Singh wrote:
>if we were to try and resolve this without >removing rpms, what would
>that solution look like ?

Increment epoch. Almost as tasty as removing rpms.

incrementing epoch will cause a chain of other issues so I don't think it's the good way to go here.

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel

Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com