On 01/08/2015 02:07 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On 8 January 2015 at 12:51, Johnny Hughes <johnny@centos.org
> <mailto:johnny@centos.org>> wrote:
>
>     eating that list of things missing right now, once I get it, I
>     > will look at the build logs to see what we need to try to rebuild.
>
>     Here is a list of Packages that have a .x86_64.rpm but will not have an
>     i686.rpm
>
>     If any of these are a show stopper for someone, we will need a way to
>     make them build:
>
>     http://fpaste.org/167305/
>
>     Hopefully we will have an installable test tree soon.
>
>
>
> Johnny, a bit confused.. this looks like a list of i686 packages
>
> spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7_0.1.i686.rpm
> spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7.i686.rpm
> spice-server-devel-0.12.4-5.el7_0.1.i686.rpm
> spice-server-devel-0.12.4-5.el7.i686.rpm
> supermin-4.1.4-2.el7.i686.rpm
> supermin-helper-4.1.4-2.el7.i686.rpm
> tboot-1.7.4-1.el7.i686.rpm
> virt-top-1.0.8-7.el7.i686.rpm
> xorg-x11-server-Xspice-0.1.1-9.el7.i686.rpm
>
> Posted by hughesjr at 08 Jan 2015, 05:24:33 UTC

Right ... I took all the x86_64 rpms and I did a sed replace of x86_64
with i686 to generate a full list of i686 packages if everything built.

I then actually removed from the list everything we actually have that
will build.

That leaves this list .. which is package names (including i686) that
will not build in i686.