Awesome. We're looking forward to giving this a spin on Barreleye.
-----Original Message-----
From: centos-devel-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-devel-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Fabian Arrotin
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 1:07 PM
To: centos-devel@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] CentOS-7 / powerpc LE bring up
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 25/09/15 17:49, James O'Connor wrote:
>
>> On Sep 23, 2015, at 11:53 AM, James O'Connor
>> <jpoc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 18, 2015, at 12:27 PM, James O'Connor
>>> <jpoc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> As of last night, the minimal c7.01.01-ppc64le buildroot is complete
>>> and I'm untangling circular dependencies in the CentOS
>>> 7.1.1503 source rpms. I've built 700 of 2523 source packages so 27%
>>> complete with this first pass.
>>>
>>> Next, I'll bootstrap java-1.7.0-openjdk and continue to loop through
>>> ppc64le rpm builds with mock. In the next 1-2 weeks, I should have
>>> 95+% of the source packages building for ppc64le.
>>> At which point we can create the first CentOS 7 ppc64le VMs and
>>> rebuild c7.01.02-ppc64le atop CentOS 7 instead of Fedora 21.
>>>
>>
>> The latest CentOS 7 ppc64le tally is 1983 of 2523 source packages
>> building or 78% complete. Hit a small snag with the atlas package not
>> building that I didn't run into before. Thinking it may be due to the
>> single core on the Fedora 21 builder VM. Once atlas builds, the rest
>> the source packages should fall into line in short order.
>> java-1.7.0-openjdk is built as are most of the apache/jpackage/maven
>> stack.
>>
>
> The atlas pthread build issue was resolved by adding multiple cores to
> the Fedora 21 builder VM. The Centos 7 ppc64le phase1 build is
> 97+% complete. I have built 2460 source packages, over 6400 binary
> rpms and there shouldn't be any more circular dependencies to unwind.
> We are ready to create the first pass CentOS 7 LE builder VMs. There
> are at least 57 source packages in the 2523 source package list that
> are exclusive to Intel arches.
>
> If someone on the centos build team would find me on irc or email, we
> could discuss lorax version and configuration to build CentOS 7
> ppc64le builders and tying my c7.01.01-ppc64le repository into a more
> structured build process to generate a c7.01.02-ppc64le repository.
>
> In the meantime, I'll circle back and help get CentOS 7 ppc64/ppc
> caught up to the same point as ppc64le.
>
> Thanks -James
As an image talks more than words :
https://twitter.com/Arrfab/status/647471456650199044
Thanks James for the hard work on ppc64le .. now also time to do the same for ppc64 :D
Happy Friday !
- --
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlYFjUcACgkQnVkHo1a+xU7NFwCgm6Fbyk03MszUaiAZjpFoeh77
LgIAoJlDnv8U9HiP4V8vVTvd3hfA3f1L
=Ee1T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel