On Apr 18, 2011 2:01 PM, "David Hrbáč" <david-lists@hrbac.cz> wrote:
> Dne 16.4.2011 12:16, Yury V. Zaytsev napsal(a):
>> 1) Version control based static generator, i.e. jekyll or hyde
>> 2) All-in-one CMS stack for typical SMB websites (Drupal, CMSMS)
>> 3) Framework-based website (i.e. Django + Django-CMS etc.)
>>
>
> Yury,
> Wow, I see you have plenty of time :o). Great post. As to CMS,
> framework, static pages, etc. This is something very hard for me to
> decide. I don’t know actual page statistics on www.centos.org. This
> point is very important to consider. So we need to know actual traffic
> to seriously start thinking on technical part of implementation. You may
> be considering Drupal, but the actual traffic might be so high, that
> Drupal without cache, memcached, etc. won't be able do deliver pages
> smoothly and quickly.
> As to the three proposed designs. Sorry guys don't take it personally, I
> don't like either of them.
> DH
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel