On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Sam Kottler <s@shk.io> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 01/27/2014 04:07 PM, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
> > Hi Sam,
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Sam Kottler <s@shk.io
> > <mailto:s@shk.io>> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 01/23/2014 10:49 AM, Sam Kottler wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 01/23/2014 10:34 AM, Javier Fontan wrote:
> >> >> For OpenNebula we need at least version 0.7.3.
> >> >
> >> > Great, thanks. So 0.7.4 seems like it'll be okay for all the people who
> >> > requested more recent versions. There are two dependencies which are
> >> > pending push to EPEL updates; once those are available (tonight's push)
> >> > I will add them as requires to the cloud-init spec and submit an update.
> >>
> >> I've submitted the update:
> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cloud-init-0.7.4-1.el6.
> >> Auto-karma is disabled because I'd like the opennebula and cloudstack
> >> folks specifically to test it, but if you're on EC2/OpenStack or any of
> >> the other supported platforms it'd be great to have this tested as well.
> >
> > Tested on OpenStack. Missing dependencies:
> > - python-jsonpatch
> > - python-oauth
>
> Both of these should be available in EPEL as of late last week. Do you
> have the repos mirrored locally and haven't updated in a while?

Sorry I wasn't clear enough. Yes, they're available in EPEL but not called out as 'requires' in the cloud-init package.

I also just realized the sudo doesn't work for the cloud-user. It asks for a password. Need to dig around some more.

...Juerg


> -S
>
> >
> > and cloudinit/source/DataSourceSmartOS.py imports 'serial' (provided by
> > package pyserial) which is not available in EPEL6/CentOS6. We should
> > probably disable this datasource for EPEL6.
> >
> > The rest looks fine although I didn't do extensive testing.
> >
> > ...Juerg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> Thanks and have a great weekend!
> >>
> >> -S
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for your patience on this.
> >> >
> >> > -S
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:49 PM, sebgoa <runseb@gmail.com
> > <mailto:runseb@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Jan 22, 2014, at 6:27 PM, Juerg Haefliger <juergh@gmail.com
> > <mailto:juergh@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Sam Kottler <s@shk.io
> > <mailto:s@shk.io>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On 01/22/2014 05:01 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >> >>>>>> On 01/22/2014 12:19 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >> >>>>>>> On 01/16/2014 04:11 PM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>> For OpenStack we need 0.7.x. It'll be great if we could have
> > it in EPEL.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> reporting from a conversation on irc earlier today, Sam is
> > going to push
> >> >>>>>>> getting cloud-init 0.7.x into EPEL-6 within a few days time.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> that then means we dont need to own cloud-init in
> > CentOS-Extras/ for
> >> >>>>>>> now, and images we ship will retain an upgrade path for the
> > code/content
> >> >>>>>>> inside that.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> I think its worth waiting for the newer cloud-init to arrive
> > in epel.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> there is a possibility that we can get 0.7.5 of cloud-init,
> > which will
> >> >>>>>> help resolve a bunch of issues with opennebula and cloudstack
> > issues as
> >> >>>>>> well.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> 0.7.5 is not released upstream yet AFAICT despite their
> > documentation
> >> >>>>> site and other stuff being updated. Can anyone confirm this?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Confirmed. 0.7.5 isn't out yet. 0.7.4 isn't good enough?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> 0.7.2 should be enough for CloudStack
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -sebastien
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> ...Juerg
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> The version
> >> >>>>> that's in ubuntu seems to be built straight from bzr. I've just
> >> >>>>> committed a pretty large changeset that bumps to 0.7.4; thanks
> > to Lars
> >> >>>>> Kellogg-Stedman and Steve Hardy for their assistance. There are
> > still
> >> >>>>> some dependency issues which I'm working on fixing now, but
> > those should
> >> >>>>> hopefully be taken care of soon.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>>> CentOS-devel mailing list
> >> >>>>> CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>
> >> >>>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>>> CentOS-devel mailing list
> >> >>>> CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>
> >> >>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> >> >>>
> >> >>> _______________________________________________
> >> >>> CentOS-devel mailing list
> >> >>> CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>
> >> >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CentOS-devel mailing list
> >> CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>
> >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS-devel mailing list
> > CentOS-devel@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-devel mailing list
> CentOS-devel@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel