On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 07:55:32AM -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 05/26/2017 02:59 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I just discovered we have an issue with the package tagging about fluentd.
> > fluentd-0.12.26-2.el7

> > $ cbs list-tags |grep opstool|grep release
> > opstools7-common-release
> > opstools7-elastic-2-release
> > opstools7-elastic-common-release
>
> We should get rid of these elastic tags, or at least ignore them, and if
> there are any packages that we need in those tags, we should add them to
> fluentd-012.
>
> > opstools7-fluentd-012-release
> > opstools7-perfmon-common-release
> > opstools7-sensu-023-release
> > opstools7-sensu-027-release
> > opstools7-sensu-common-release
> >
> > can we review the mappings in order to get fluentd packages correctly
> > published?
> > Personally I would be happy if fluentd and collectd can be in their own
> > repo so they won't require openstack as dependency repo.

Packages tagged and not landing somewhere is unfortunate and should be
sorted out.
Unfortunately, that is nothing we can do, that is something for
CentOS infra folks.

I'm fine with getting rid of opstools7-elastic-* tags, we don't use them
anymore and afaik, we won't do in the future.

A while ago, we moved the packages relying on openstack packages to the
cloud sig, and cremoved the dependency of openstack from opstools.
Unfortunately, the resulting centos-release-opstools build[1]
was not tagged and pushed correctly.

[1] http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=16800

--
Matthias Runge <mrunge@matthias-runge.de>