Hi,

On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 4:15 AM Thomas Stephen Lee <lee.iitb@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I am trying to request a package for RHEL 9, but I cannot find RHEL
under Projects at issues.redhat.com.
What is the correct project for RHEL 9 ?

You have to file a bug for "distribution" component in Bugzilla.

Regards
B.
 

Thanks

---
Lee


On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 11:14 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Fedora, CentOS, and EPEL Communities!
>
> As part of our continued 3 year major Red Hat Enterprise Linux release
> cadence, RHEL 9 development is starting to wrap up with the spring
> 2022 release coming soon.  That means planning for the next release
> will start in earnest in the very near future.  As some of you may
> know, Red Hat has been using both Bugzilla and Jira via
> issues.redhat.com for RHEL development for several years.  Our
> intention is to move to using issues.redhat.com only for the major
> RHEL releases after RHEL 9.
>
> What does this mean for Fedora and CentOS?  This discussion is in part
> to figure that out.  Based on some very brief analysis, the following
> should hold:
>
> - RHEL customers should continue to file support cases through the Red
> Hat Customer portal, which will remain consistent regardless of the
> backend tooling used.
>
> - There is no imminent retirement of the Red Hat Bugzilla instance
> being planned at this time.  RHEL 7, 8, and 9 will continue to use
> bugzilla in some form and RHEL 9 has a very long lifecycle.
>
> - Fedora Linux and EPEL have their own Bugzilla product families and
> are not directly impacted in their own workflows by the choice to use
> only issues.redhat.com for RHEL.
>     - There will be impacts on existing documentation that provide
> guidance on requesting things from RHEL in various places like EPEL.
> We will be happy to help adjust these.
>
> - CentOS Stream contribution and bug reporting workflows will be
> adjusted to use issues.redhat.com instead of bugzilla in the relevant
> places.  This should apply to all versions of CentOS Stream for a
> unified contributor workflow.  This will happen gradually as we
> discover the best workflow to use.
>
> If there are other impacts that you can think of, please raise them on
> this thread.  We’d like to ensure we’re covering as much as possible
> as this rolls out.
>
> josh
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel


--
Branislav Náter
Principal Quality Engineer, Stacks QE
IRC: bnater at #qa #urt #brno
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic
redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted