On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@redhat.com> wrote:

On 01/15/2014 01:41 PM, Adam Miller wrote:
> I don't think that's a fair claim to PaaS because PaaS can exist completely
> independently of IaaS but can at points have integration. I run OpenShift
> Origin at home on bare metal on spare hardware that I don't care to incur
> the overhead of virt or IaaS. Because of this I don't like to classify PaaS
> as an IaaS application.

Is this a typical production use, though? I ask seriously - I don't know
how folks are deploying OpenShift and whether it requires IaaS to scale
well.

I don't really know if you'd call it "typical" but I know of customers currently
running OpenShift Enterprise on bare metal today.

Honestly the main reason I shy away from "typical" is because I don't

personally have stats (I suppose I could try to find them) of how different

OpenShift Origin and Enterprise users are deploying currently to define
what is and isn't typical.

-AdamM

--
Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst
jzb@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel