On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Mohammed Zeeshan <mohammed.zee1000@gmail.com> wrote:


On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Michael Hrivnak <mhrivnak@redhat.com> wrote:
Mohammed,

The problem is revealed in this strange-looking error, seen on line 16 of your paste: "local error: no renegotiation".

Docker is written in Go, the network library for which famously and contentiously [0] does not support TLS renegotiation. 

So the challenge with docker is that you must host the API (crane in this case) and the image files on web servers that will not require renegotiation.


Michael

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Mohammed Zeeshan <mohammed.zee1000@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

 I am Mohammed Zeeshan Ahmed, part of Container Tooling Team at Redhat, working on the registry component of the CentOS Container Pipeline. 

I have been trying to get pulp/crane to work for sometime now to get it to fit into the pipeline. I have setup pulp/crane on a single node (self signed certificates) while a second node acts as a client (pulp-admin and docker) currently stuck at this point http://pastebin.centos.org/40926/ and would appreciate any help in getting things to work.

Thanks in advance.

--
Mohammed Zeeshan Ahmed, 

_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list



Hi,
  I have managed to resove the certificate issue, thanks for that help Michael, however, I think work still needs to be done.

My current status, as things stand is http://pastebin.centos.org/40971/. Could use some more help to resolve this one.

--
Mohammed Zeeshan Ahmed, 
B.E Computer Science Engineering
Certified IT & Cloud Architect & RHCSA
+919986458839
Bengaluru, India



Hi,

 I have raised an issue along this problem that I am facing so that it becomes easier to track.

https://pulp.plan.io/issues/1750

--
Mohammed Zeeshan Ahmed, 
B.E Computer Science Engineering
Certified IT & Cloud Architect & RHCSA
+919986458839
Bengaluru, India