On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh@centos.org> wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/02/16 07:29, Bamacharan Kundu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vaclav presented the build pipeline very nicely and this would
> take out lot of tension for building the code, checking the code
> standards and test cases from the developer.
>
> I would like to add few points on this.
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Vaclav Pavlin <vpavlin@redhat.com
> <mailto:vpavlin@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> As KB wrote, I brought up the idea of using OpenShift as a glue
> (i.e. workflow controller). The result can be found here:
>
> https://github.com/vpavlin/cccp-demo-openshift
>
> TL;DR:
>
> The repository contains OpenShift Template defining the workflow -
> build,test, delivery and (very poorly) implements the steps through
> Docker images (i.e. Dockerfiles and run scripts).
>
> The developer should do only git push to his VCS and this should
> trigger the build process in the pipeline.

in an onprem story that would map well, but note that were aiming to
run a hosted service with a distinct UI ( even if the UI is no UI )

 

Yes, now I got it. I had a thought to minimize the number of Dockerfiles,

so that the user does not get confused of.

>
> In this TDD process all the environments (including the build,
> test, delivery) would be created as a container and once the step
> is over it will destroy the environment. As output this will
> generate a application runtime along with the successfully built
> application code to registry.
>
> As you mentioned this would be tagged with test along with jenkins
> build id, so that developer or QA can trace for which commit this
> is built.
>
> Then for the next stages, successfully built image would be
> deployed to openshift instance to get through the test, delivery
> stages checking, along with the quality gates.
>
> all the stages should be linked to pipeline and should be easily
> re-producible so that any one can check or regenerate the issues
> instantly.

add another dimension there - collection of related containers, ie.
the entire microservice should be reproduceable.

This means system needs to maintain all the linking and volume sharing 

of the components.  

>
> It's easily runnable in Vagrant with use of Project Atomic
> Developer Bundle.
>
> If you are interested in more info, I'd suggest to read the readme
> in the repo, I hope it summarizes it clearly.
>
> It's a very minimal demo, but I think it suggests the path, which
> could take us to the Unicorns land, quite well:).
>
> Let me know in case of any questions, suggestions or requests for
> guidance in case anybody decides to take this further.
>
> I would like to take this further, please let me know if my
> thought process is in the same line as yours or any changes,
> suggestions.

we need to work through whats needed to now integrate with the
cccp-index content, and then map that back to deliverables. I had
asked Zeeshan to look at registry side for delivery space, unsure how
far he's gotten with that.

 

I believe, I should look for integration with cccp-index content?

Regards

Bamacharan

--

Bamacharan Kundu
IRC Nick- bamachrn
http://bamacharankundu.wordpress.com/

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel