On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 8:03 AM Karsten Wade <kwade@redhat.com> wrote:
Circling back on this, our Board discussion last week was fruitfultoward solving this.We'd like to use git.centos.org as an issue tracker for interacting withthe Board and for tracking our various efforts. We're moving fromlargely manual processes, which we've been creating since the additionof CentOS Stream made it necessary to re-consider CentOS as acontributor project in need of active, visible leaders.What is the next step? I'm ready to build out the repo, figure out whatdifferent personas need, and so on.
Is the intention here we just log an issue and it becomes a conversation topic? That's my interpretation of this, if that's the case, we just need the actual repo created and it works organically from there.
Best,- KarstenOn 5/13/20 2:43 AM, Aoife Moloney wrote:>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 7:34 AM Leigh Griffin <lgriffin@redhat.com> <mailto:lgriffin@redhat.com>> wrote:>>>> On Tue, May 12, 2020, 23:54 Karsten Wade <kwade@redhat.com> <mailto:kwade@redhat.com>> wrote:>>> On 5/6/20 6:31 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:> > I must lead with this: It is with great trepidation that I> even write> > this message, because I have no desire to burn bridges. I> currently> > enjoy a cordial working relationship with everyone on the> board, and,> > without exception, have great respect for each of them> personally. But> > it is my job to point out that the board's method of engaging> with the> > community isn't working.>> Thanks all for bringing this discussion along, we seem to have> arrived> at "yes and what tool." :) In parallel we need to have some idea> of the> personas of the people using this tool.>> For some more context about Rich's email:>> I asked Rich to start this thread when he asked me this> question. I said> then and here, it's true we do not have clear processes for getting> things heard and approved/denied by the Board.>> As a Director and as the current Board Secretary, I am highly> interested> and somewhat desperate to solve those problems -- my task list> for the> Board and the Project is a bit unruly and dependent on other> humans to> move things along. The practice of open source software projects> reminds> us that I shouldn't be solving that problem in isolation, without> transparency and the collaboration that comes with it.>> So let's work on it together. Let's figure out a reasonable> process that> will work right now, and iterate on it as needed over time.>> There are a number of people who care about CentOS as a project,> let's> call them "project stakeholders". They all wish to engage with the> project leadership for guidance and approval around various efforts.>> Can we use this thread to define those stakeholder personas,> what kinds> of things/ways they need to engage with the Board, and how we> can make> that happen?`>>> The CPE team is one such persona who need to engage with the Board> for key decisions and info sharing on technical projects we are> undertaking that might impact CentOS as a whole. We also want a 2> way conversation on requirements and needs that the Board, on behalf> of the Community, may wish for us to undertake e.g. service> creation/ modification. Actions here might impact the Community from> a technical or user interaction perspective so a public tracker is> key to allow transparency into the conversations.>>> I have a feeling there are some folks here experienced with helping> define functional requirements and user personas, you are hereby> invited> to help this discussion move forward.>>> My entire professional background is in this area, I'm happy to> help where my time will allow. I'm also happy to offer the services> of our Product Owner Aoife Moloney to help capture this who also> works in this manner day in day out.>>> +1, I'm more than happy to work out how best to engage with the CentOS> Board from the CPE team side, with the board :) And any tooling/methods> we identify as having potential success can also be scaled to allow for> the wider project stakeholder groups to engage in this manner also &> happy to use this thread as suggested for working this out with everyone> collectively.>> From the CPE side, we are a stakeholder to the CentOS Project and are> happy to file requests/issues through a public tracker as mentioned> above. If you opt to track through issues.redhat.com> labels to identify types of tickets will help the review process if the> board only meets monthly.> You could honestly have labels for anything - hardware request, travel,> new feature approval, etc. Continue to use the devel list for open> discussion and feedback and by adding the link to your issue tracker in> your email signature, there will be easy and quick access for people to> file their request directly from conversational engagement on the email> thread to a formal trackable request to the board to action.>> I have ideas and am happy to help here, it benefits us all to have this> clarity. So lets decide what tool first - does the board have a> preference? You will be the ones using it! :)>>> Best regards,>> - Karsten> --> Karsten Wade [he/him/his]| Senior Community Architect | @quaid> Red Hat Open Source Program Office (OSPO) : @redhatopen>> _______________________________________________> CentOS-devel mailing list>> _______________________________________________> CentOS-devel mailing list>>>> -->> Aoife Moloney>> Product Owner>> Community Platform Engineering Team>> Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com>>> Communications House>> Cork Road>> Waterford <mailto:Waterford>>>>> _______________________________________________> CentOS-devel mailing list>--Karsten Wade [he/him/his]| Senior Community Architect | @quaidRed Hat Open Source Program Office (OSPO) : @redhatopen_______________________________________________CentOS-devel mailing list
--
Leigh Griffin
Engineering Manager
Communications House
Cork Road, Waterford City
lgriffin@redhat.com
M: +353877545162 IM: lgriffin
 |
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list