On 01/08/2015 03:44 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On 8 January 2015 at 14:35, Johnny Hughes <johnny@centos.org
> <mailto:johnny@centos.org>> wrote:
>
>     On 01/08/2015 02:07 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     > On 8 January 2015 at 12:51, Johnny Hughes <johnny@centos.org <mailto:johnny@centos.org>

>     > <mailto:johnny@centos.org <mailto:johnny@centos.org>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     eating that list of things missing right now, once I get it, I
>     >     > will look at the build logs to see what we need to try to rebuild.
>     >
>     >     Here is a list of Packages that have a .x86_64.rpm but will not have an
>     >     i686.rpm
>     >
>     >     If any of these are a show stopper for someone, we will need a way to
>     >     make them build:
>     >
>     >     http://fpaste.org/167305/
>     >
>     >     Hopefully we will have an installable test tree soon.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Johnny, a bit confused.. this looks like a list of i686 packages
>     >
>     > spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7_0.1.i686.rpm
>     > spice-server-0.12.4-5.el7.i686.rpm
>     > spice-server-devel-0.12.4-5.el7_0.1.i686.rpm
>     > spice-server-devel-0.12.4-5.el7.i686.rpm
>     > supermin-4.1.4-2.el7.i686.rpm
>     > supermin-helper-4.1.4-2.el7.i686.rpm
>     > tboot-1.7.4-1.el7.i686.rpm
>     > virt-top-1.0.8-7.el7.i686.rpm
>     > xorg-x11-server-Xspice-0.1.1-9.el7.i686.rpm
>     >
>     > Posted by hughesjr at 08 Jan 2015, 05:24:33 UTC
>
>     Right ... I took all the x86_64 rpms and I did a sed replace of x86_64
>     with i686 to generate a full list of i686 packages if everything built.
>
>     I then actually removed from the list everything we actually have that
>     will build.
>
>     That leaves this list .. which is package names (including i686) that
>     will not build in i686.
>
>
> Ah ok. The fact that you called them x86_64 but it said i686 confused
> me. I would say that the lack of Xspice is going to make the system
> unusable in the KVM console. Is there a place to see where it didn't
> build and why?

Yes, All of the build logs are here:

http://buildlogs.centos.org/

(in c7.00.0[2-4] or c7-updates)



_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel