------------------ Original ------------------
From: "centos-devel-request";<centos-devel-request@centos.org>;
Date: Mon, Mar 17, 2014 08:00 PM
To: "centos-devel"<centos-devel@centos.org>;
Subject: CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 109, Issue 16
Send CentOS-devel mailing list submissions to
centos-devel@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-devel-request@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-devel-owner@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-devel digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CentOS Docker images (Chris St. Pierre)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:30:04 -0400
From: "Chris St. Pierre" <chris.a.st.pierre@gmail.com>
Subject: [CentOS-devel] CentOS Docker images
To: centos-devel@centos.org
Message-ID:
<CAGwiO7ZcLRbD=_ZyxecK716NOU3VJ7i69K6vf3zfPmn-_D8-Tw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I've volunteered to help maintain official CentOS Docker (
https://www.docker.io/) images, and Karanbir suggested I email the list to
"thrash out what we need at the infra end to achieve these images."
Currently, there are 'centos' images available in the top-level Docker
registry namespace, but these are maintained by dotcloud. I think we can
do better. :)
As I see it, there are two ways we can do this:
1. Use ami-creator (https://github.com/katzj/ami-creator), or something
derived from it, to build Docker images from a kickstart file. This is how
CentOS AMIs are currently built.
Pros: Consistent with how AMIs are usually built; Kickstart is a known
entity.
Cons: ami-creator won't actually work for us as-is; requires a full
kickstart config.
2. Use the mkimage-yum.sh script from Docker (
https://github.com/dotcloud/docker/blob/master/contrib/mkimage-yum.sh),
customized as necessary to produce a minimal base image.
Pros: Consistent with how Docker images are usually built; we can
contribute changes to mkimage-yum.sh upstream to help other Yum-based
distros; only requires a yum config.
Cons: Requires changing a shell script to make changes to the base image,
not just a Kickstart.
Unfortunately, Docker Trusted Build (
http://blog.docker.io/2013/11/introducing-trusted-builds/) can't be used
for base images, AFAICT.
In either case, we'll need a git repo to hold the code and configs used to
build the images. If we follow the example of the official CentOS AMIs (
http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS), it should be sufficient to provide a
reasonably up-to-date base image ("latest" or "nightly" or similar), and a
few recent dot releases. Of course, once CentOS 7 is released we'll need
to do that for both 6 and 7, but that shouldn't be difficult if we do this
right.
Thoughts on process and/or infrastructure?
--
Chris St. Pierre
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140316/e56a5ee8/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
End of CentOS-devel Digest, Vol 109, Issue 16
*********************************************
.