On 08/25/2016 08:33 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 25/08/16 13:27, Haïkel wrote:

2016-08-25 8:36 GMT+02:00 Matthias Runge <mrunge@matthias-runge.de>:

Hello,

for opstools, we'll need nodejs in a repo, I've seen the Cloud SIG
creating their version, PaaS has done the same (just illustrating, I may
be wrong).

This is mostly a mail to ask for interested persons to join or
coordinate efforts here. No need to do the same work multiple times.


What would be the best repository for cross-SIG dependencies?

Matthias


I'm afraid there is none.
As Cloud SIG needed a lot of common python dependencies, I originally
offered to maintain those in a common
repositories (and why not collaborating with EPEL) but there was
little interest to do so.
We even separated the build tags (hence cloud7-openstack-common-*) to
make the transition easier.

I'm not keen on maintaining separately node.js but the only
alternative we had are SCLs and quite old.
Maybe we could work on a common layer SIG that could serve that role.

Regards,
H.

IIRC, EPEL/nodejs-maintainers were looking to upgrade straight to nodejs
version 6.

But not until mid-October, when
". . . the Node.js v6 schedule has it going into LTS mode on the same day that 0.10.x reaches EOL."


I currently don't know the requirements esp. regarding openssl.

I suppose they have the same patch which allows them to build nodejs 4 (or 6) using openssl 1.0.1


Upstream Nodejs version 6 bundles openssl 1.0.2h, which makes me wonder
if we could simply drop it and link node against the CentOS version of
openssl. We should not maintain another openssl library here.

We'll just use the patch that was discussed previously that allows us to build nodejs against openssl 1.0.1.


Matthias




_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel