On 7/6/20 3:55 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> never been involved with the nfv sig,
>
Karanbir, looks like you are the only one in the adminstrator role of
sig-nfv.
> regards
>
> On 06/07/2020 14:23, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote:
>> Adding kb as NFV Sig chair.
>>
>> What needs to be done to get this moving on?, some maintainers
>> (including myself) have requested access to nfv-sig group but there has
>> been no response.
>>
>> What's the status of NFV SIG?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:32 PM Dominik Holler <Dominik.Holler@gmx.net
>> <mailto:Dominik.Holler@gmx.net>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > From: Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej@redhat.com
>> <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com>
>> > <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com <mailto:amoralej@redhat.com>>>
>> > Date: Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 1:24 PM
>> > Subject: [CentOS-devel] Rebuilding OpenvSwitch and OVN from Fast
>> > DataPath in NFV Sig
>> > To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel@centos.org
>> <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org>
>> > <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org <mailto:centos-devel@centos.org>>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > During the last years OpenVswitch and OVN have become a major
>> > dependency for several projects and SIGs in the CentOS ecosystem,
>> > including OpenStack, oVirt and OpenShift. During this time each
>> > project has been following its own way with limited coordination
>> > (just some opportunistic cross-tagging between SIGs) and different
>> > approaches, rebuilding Fedora builds or FDP srpms from
>> ftp.redhat.com <http://ftp.redhat.com>
>> > <http://ftp.redhat.com>
>> > from time to time in their own tags and repos.
>> >
>> > This has led to multiple issues and suboptimal usage resources so I
>> > think a good step ahead would be to use existing NFV SIG [1] as a
>> > collaboration area for all the interested projects to build, test and
>> > ship OpenvSwitch and OVN using public SRPMs from Fast Datapath [2].
>> >
>> > What I'm proposing is that the interested people in becoming
>> > maintainers for OVS/OVN in NFV Sig request membership to nfv-sig group
>> > [3]. Then, we'll coordinate to request new tags/buildroots for OVS/OVN
>> > and start building and testing the required releases.
>> >
>> > Any thoughts on this proposal?
>> >
>>
>> I think this would be efficient.
>> I already applied to become a member of sig-nfv to help.
>>
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Alfredo
>> >
>> >
>> > [1] https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/NFV
>> > [2]
>> >
>> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/8Base/en/Fast-Datapath/SRPMS/
>> > [3] https://accounts.centos.org/group/members/sig-nfv
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > CentOS-devel mailing list
>> > CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>
>> <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org <mailto:CentOS-devel@centos.org>>
>> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Didi
>> >
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA R&D RHV