Il giorno gio 12 mar 2020 alle ore 15:01 Fabian Arrotin <arrfab@centos.org> ha scritto:
Hi all SIG members,

When working in our "Staging" environment while validating the new
signing process (still to be announced when fully in use/prod), we
detected some SIGs having multiple variants/versions of their packages.

Just one example (already discussed with Niels and Kaleb in
#centos-devel but let's just this one a example):
Gluster has multiple versions still listed on mirror.centos.org :
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/

As the new process would automatically decide where to push content
based on koji/cbs tag name, we found the interesting corner case of
gluster312.
The CBS tag is storage7-gluster-312-release and so new process would
push to
centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-312/ instead of
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/storage/x86_64/gluster-3.12/ (see the
diff betwen koji/cbs tag and the final path/destination)

It seems that only Gluster was impacted for older releases, while it
should be good for new releases (tested).

But so that brings the following request : can you come with a list of
EOL repositories that you'd like us to trim/remove from
mirror.centos.org (they'll be archived to vault.centos.org) ?
Doing that at the same time as we launch the new signing/push process
would be a good idea.

Thanks a lot in advance for your collaboration !

For oVirt, you can move to vault:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/ovirt-4.2/ since oVirt 4.2 reached EOL around one year ago and is not compatible with CentOS 7.7
and
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/ovirt-4.4/ since upstream decided to drop el7 support for oVIrt 4.4 and have it el8 only.

 

--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel


--