This sounds good ....with all participating actively seems the way to go.



Best Regards,

Sandeep L Khuperkar | Director

Mobile : +91-9987536436

Skype id : khuperkar


ASHNIK TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.

#141, Powai Plaza, Hiranandani Gardens, Powai, Mumbai - 400076

India | www.ashnik.com

icons

 

Email patch



On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab@centos.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 15/09/15 06:52, Takashi Ohsawa wrote:
>> Perhaps we can get folks who have shown interest in having Power
>> on CentOS to post their preferred architecture here?
>
> My vote is LE architecture.  Currently , I am using CentOS on IA.
> My application porting is easy because LE is same as IA's endian.
>
> -- -- Takashi Ohsawa --

Well, both ppc64 and ppc64le will be built/worked on in parallel, and
there is now enough "horse power" to make that happen :-)
Bootstrapping the initial buildroot for both is the most difficult
part, and where people will have to spend time for "manual" mock
build. After that, a simple queuing system can distribute the build
jobs on multiple mock builders (like plague, koji or reimzul - centos
buildsystem - )

- --
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlX3qzAACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6mSACfal7z1LaD+metabt/S8tpdnmU
/gsAn2eO/X9JeiwK6/Va+EIMTzYJbAMq
=5HY2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel