On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 1:38 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 01:29:42PM -0500, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> Thanks for admitting that the reason Red Hat did this was financial. This
> BS about it being "a better way for Community input into RHEL" is just
> that, BS.

I don't think this is in conflict with the FAQ or what I have been saying.
The FAQ clearly talks about "shifting resources and investments".

However, I have seen many times people suggesting that this is intended to
force CentOS users into buying RHEL. That really is not the case.


Yeah... right.

 
Forgive my sarcasm here, but Red Hat has earned it. "What does this mean for CentOS? Nothing." "We will continue to support existing timelines." Etc. etc. I trust Red Hat as far as I can throw them, and I am not alone.



--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel


--

Matt Phelps

Information Technology Specialist, Systems Administrator

(Computation Facility, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory)

Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian


60 Garden Street | MS 39 | Cambridge, MA 02138

email: mphelps@cfa.harvard.edu


cfa.harvard.edu | Facebook | Twitter | YouTube | Newsletter