On 07/06/14 01:44, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> hi,
>
> Taking on board the community and environment expansion that is taking
> place around the CentOS project, the CentOS Board has been considering
> how best to accomodate these efforts.
>
> I'm attaching here a plan put forward by the board towards that aim.
>
> Thoughts ? Comments ?

I think that given the difficulty that we already have in persuading people to update to 6.$latest from 6.$prehistoric that produciing even more frequent variants is not such a good idea. If the SIGs need a versioning scheme for the layers on top of the base o/s then the new naming scheme sounds good for those but the core o/s, I believe, should stick with mirroring upstream release numbers.

T