For the record, we are also observing the same problem in CloudSIG openstack-antelope testing repo:

[MIRROR] libsodium-1.0.18-7.el9s.x86_64.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 1f2a5abe61bdd68bcbee962cf9a3b81158d1e5b987b24f421cb902924d75bb89(sha256)  Expected: 8147c75c0454e7e58f5ac3a351e08b8b734ac3ddef803885c085515523ad8327(sha256)
(14/194): openstack-barbican-worker-16.0.0-2.el9s.noarch.rpm                                                                                                  2.1 kB/s | 8.4 kB     00:04    
[MIRROR] python-oslo-cache-lang-3.3.1-1.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 7344f476bdf799f62457a6a34bfee00a845656eca4b19429d25e97dfde1c2b38(sha256)  Expected: 125622fdeb3a2e02aa4cdcbc25a9a631677aba4c4de97d823ddb3c5230ecb714(sha256)
[MIRROR] python-oslo-concurrency-lang-5.1.1-2.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: cd53374a430a54df57a6482c2805e931dfd0030778a1a16fcf6e8b97a2dda69c(sha256)  Expected: e0c44f79afc2568b30e85f3aeb128f375129694c77166bfa07a73c3bacd6bb53(sha256)
[MIRROR] python-oslo-cache-lang-3.3.1-1.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 7344f476bdf799f62457a6a34bfee00a845656eca4b19429d25e97dfde1c2b38(sha256)  Expected: 125622fdeb3a2e02aa4cdcbc25a9a631677aba4c4de97d823ddb3c5230ecb714(sha256)
[FAILED] python-oslo-cache-lang-3.3.1-1.el9s.noarch.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success                                                            

My recommendation for users hitting this so far in CloudSIG or NFV SIG is to move to release repos unless you want to explicitly test new packages recently added to -testing repo.

Alfredo


On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:16 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso <amoralej@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,

Apparently untagging/tagging packages in the -testing tag is helping to fix the issue in some packages (ovn22.12, openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy, ovn22.09) but not openvswitch3.1-3.1.0-23.el9s.

I'm currently untagging it to test the previous build.

Note that in NFV SIG we are building the same packages in C9S and RHEL9 buildroots with different disttag el9s vs el9. May this be related?

Alfredo



On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:53 AM YATIN KAREL <yatinkarel@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

Seeing similar issues in Openstack CI[1].

For example:-
$ sudo dnf install --repofrompath=tmp,https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/9-stream/nfv/x86_64/openvswitch-2/ --enablerepo=tmp --disablerepo=* openvswitch3.1
Added tmp repo from https://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/9-stream/nfv/x86_64/openvswitch-2/
tmp                                                                              11 kB/s | 3.0 kB     00:00    
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================================================
 Package                                     Architecture      Version                     Repository      Size
================================================================================================================
Installing:
 openvswitch3.1                              x86_64            3.1.0-23.el9s               tmp            6.8 M
Installing dependencies:
 openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy            noarch            1.0-31.el9s                 tmp             14 k

Transaction Summary
================================================================================================================
Install  2 Packages

Total download size: 6.8 M
Installed size: 22 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
[MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256)  Expected: 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256)
[MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256)  Expected: 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256)
[MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256)  Expected: 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256)
[MIRROR] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match. Calculated: 8e2f3b2089ea33e20e3b2a76190f9facae77772fdb9dd72e9c3d3b426fc2edb9(sha256)  Expected: 17e5200b2c4045b2060e094ff383317f5c55744eb482d91b1ae026d473b83dc2(sha256)
[FAILED] openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success
(2/2): openvswitch3.1-3.1.0-23.el9s.  1% [-                                   ]  68 kB/s | 109 kB     01:41 ETA
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'.
Error: Error downloading packages:
  openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-31.el9s.noarch: Cannot download, all mirrors were already tried without success


Thanks and Regards
Yatin Karel

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 7:38 PM Fabian Arrotin <arrfab@centos.org> wrote:
On 19/05/2023 15:59, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>
>
> Il giorno ven 19 mag 2023 alle ore 15:52 Troy Dawson <tdawson@redhat.com
> <mailto:tdawson@redhat.com>> ha scritto:
>
>     Those don't sound like CentOS packages.
>     Centos packages do not have dist tags of .el9s  or .el8s
>     Please check the repo's those are coming from and contact the
>     respective repository owners.
>
>
> Those are from CentOS SIGs,
> https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=39630
> <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=39630>
> https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=42936
> <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=42936>
>

Can you elaborate where you're seeing that ? you mentioned oVirt CI so
outside of centos infra (or outside of CBS)
How do you test , from which repo, etc ?
It's true that packages in -testing are now signed (it was announced
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2023-May/142901.html)
but is that for -release ? what about mirrormanager ?

--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrfab[@fosstodon.org]

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel


--
Yatin Karel
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel