This looks good to me. For the Gluster repos in the Storage SIG we'llOn Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:03:11PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> 2018-03-06 17:40 GMT+01:00 Brian Stinson <brian@bstinson.com>:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Mar 06 00:11, Brian Stinson wrote:
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > Now that we have SIG Content in the /altarch directories for CentOS 7 on
> > the
> > > mirrors, we need to come with some requirements and recommendations for
> > dealing
> > > with the different locations.
> > >
> > > tl;dr The current thinking is to add the following snippet in the %post
> > of
> > > centos-release and release to all of the arches. This will set a yum var
> > to the
> > > correct content location when a new system gets installed:
> > >
> > > `uname -m | grep -q 'x86_64' && echo 'centos'
> > >/etc/yum/vars/contentdir || echo 'altarch' >/etc/yum/vars/contentdir`
> > >
> > > Here's the start of a proposal from the SIG perspective
> > >
> > > ## Requirements:
> > >
> > > - The same noarch binary RPM *must* be distributable to the Extras
> > > repo for each architecture
> > >
> > > - The centos-release-<SIG> packages *must* require centos-release
> > >
> > >
> > > ## New Recommendations for creating a centos-release file:
> > >
> > > - A yum variable called 'contentdir' will be populated with the toplevel
> > > directory for SIGs to use
> > >
> > > 1.) Modify baseurls in the SIG repo files to look like the following
> > (using
> > > openstack-queens as an example):
> > >
> > >
> > > [centos-openstack-queens]
> > > name=CentOS-7 - OpenStack queens
> > > baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/$contentdir/cloud/$
> > basearch/openstack-queens/
> > > gpgcheck=1
> > > enabled=1
> > > gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-SIG- Cloud
> > > exclude=sip,PyQt4
> > >
> > >
> > > ## Discussion
> > >
> > > I'd like to hear thoughts, additions, and subtractions here before we
> > update
> > > the SIGGuide and rework centos-release.
> > >
> > > Cheers!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Brian Stinson
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CentOS-devel mailing list
> > > CentOS-devel@centos.org
> > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel
> >
> > To be clear,
> >
> > This is a PROPOSAL at this stage, we haven't actually made any changes
> > to centos-release yet. At this point if you're actively doing work
> > relying on the new variable, it will break!
> >
> > Also thank you to the folks up-thread who pointed out that there was a
> > typo in the repo entry. mirror.centos.org should use http://
> >
>
>
> Any update on the acceptance of the proposal?
follow this approach as soon as the packages are synced to the mirror
(just filed bug 14631) and a new centos-release with the 'contentdir'
variable is available.
Thanks,
Niels