On Tue, Dec 22, 2020, 11:56 PM Strahil Nikolov via CentOS-devel <centos-devel@centos.org> wrote:
В 20:13 -0600 на 22.12.2020 (вт), Mike McGrath написа:


On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 7:14 PM Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@redhat.com> wrote:

And herein lies the problem.  I'm doing my best to answer questions.  You are angry and have directed your anger at me, all of which is completely understandable.  I could do without the namecalling but if you can't help yourself, I get it.  I'm here doing my best to make sure people understand what is going on.  And you're right, one of the many factors that went into this decision was business health and yes, as you point out, revenue is tied to business health.  The problem is you've made several uninformed claims about Red Hat's business.  For one, infrastructure revenues, as were publicly reported up through last year, have remained basically the same for years at Red Hat. 


Sorry for the self reply, I realized this last sentence was sufficiently ambiguous that I'd clarify it.  Infrastructure revenues had constant growth, not significantly up or down.  Anyway, we are now WAY off-topic for a -devel list so for those that want to know more about how to read form 10k's and public SEC documents, find me on IRC after the new year :)

Hey Mike,

Is there a chance to prolong the Stream's life any further ? Maybe with a SIG ?
I think that if stream's life was a little bit longer , Stream could have a better adoption .

Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov 

Low chance but not impossible.  We just shook things up and the results of that shakeup are a little unclear.  The question for a longer lifecycle on stream will depend entirely on why one of the soon-to-be announced RHEL programs won't work for you.  So that's a discussion for another time.

       -Mike

_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel