On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, at 11:47, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
On 19/06/2019 17:43, Brian Stinson wrote:

<snip>
>>
>> Does that mean having the add-ons like ha/rs going either to BaseOS (for
>> simple packages) or to AppStream (if built as modules") ?

> There are some HA and RT components that are shipped to CentOS BaseOS,
> but these are separate from the HighAvailability and RT variants in
> upstream. We won't ship the HA or RT variants.


I mean RS and not RT, but same concept/idea :)
So do you mean that we have sources landed on git.centos.org, that we
have eventually built but that we'll not ship ? If so that contrasts
with what we used to do and would like to know why

-- 
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab


_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel


Attachments:

To say this a different way. If it gets pushed to a c8 branch, it goes in BaseOS (again, an oversimplification because there are 1 or 2 exceptions, but close enough). I'd like to *not* maintain HighAvailability/ResilientStorage/etc. as separate variant repos in CentOS.