Hi,
Do you publish somewhere those packages, which are built for multilib purposes but are not in the RHEL packagelist? I'd like to use them for bootstrapping the EL7 i686 builds and see, what happens. I don't like to use Fedora 19 packages for bootstrapping, since I'd have to do the compilation twice.
I'd like to help building the i686 packages, where should I start?
Peter Bojtos
ULX Ltd.
Feladó: "Johnny Hughes" <johnny@centos.org>
Címzett: centos-devel@centos.org
Elküldött üzenetek: Csütörtök, 2014. Június 26. 14:05:22
Tárgy: Re: [CentOS-devel] missing packages from buildlogs repo
On 06/26/2014 06:18 AM, Bojtos Péter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I tried to built some RHEL packages for i686 architecture. I tried to
> use the i686 packages here:
> http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64-latest/
>
> The build did not succeed, since several packages are missing. (that's
> ok since Red Hat dropped i686 support)
>
> The interesting part is that there is the source package *cracklib*,
> which produces the following packages:
> cracklib, cracklib-devel, cracklib-dicts, cracklib-python.
>
> Cracklib and cracklib devel is in the repo for i686 but the other two
> packages are missing. How can it be?
> Did I miss some information about populating the repo?
The multilib packages contained in CentOS-7 x86_64 distro are the same
as those contained in the upstream EL7 version, as we purposely match
the filelists.
As KB stated, all the i686 packages we needed to do the build are in the
c7.00.0? (or c7-updates) directories. But even those are not enough for
a full tree ... just want we needed to get all the i686 for multilib.
We are planning on building a full i686 ARCH, as I have said before.
But the x86_64 manifest will not have all the i686 packages, only the
multilib ones.
So eventually, all the i686 RPMs will be available when we actually
build to complete an i686 tree.
_______________________________________________
CentOS-devel mailing list
CentOS-devel@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel