This was already mentioned (kind of) but what is wrong with following: Centos x.y-YYMM This way you keep the current way and allow to create snapshots (one per month) Thanks Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android |
| > From: centos-devel-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-devel- > bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Ned Slider > Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 5:41 AM > > Yet another +1 > > If a change is REQUIRED, that change should happen upstream in RHEL and > then filter down to CentOS - i.e, if RHEL-7.1406 were to be released then a > change to CentOS-7.1406 would make sense. > +1 for staying aligned with upstream. "CentOS X.Y == RHEL X.Y" is easy to explain to management and corporate IT organizations that are hostile / risk-averse to open-source. Anything that requires more words / though and you're on the defensive and have lost the battle. -Bryson ________________________________ Please note that my e-mail address has changed. My new (current) address is Bryson.Lee@sslmda.com. ________________________________ This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and any attachments. _______________________________________________ CentOS-devel mailing list CentOS-devel@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel |