On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Brian Stinson <bstinson@ksu.edu> wrote:

> I'd much rather not do this for a couple reasons:
> 1. CentOS Extras shouldn't overlap with EPEL.
> 2. If there are reasons to customize/patch some of these things for the
> CentOS infrastructure, perhaps they belong in a new/separate repo --
> especially considering centos-extras is enabled by default.

Good points. Would a separate cbs-tools repo, with a cbs-tools-release
package in CentOS-Extras be acceptable?