Discuss September 2004

discuss@lists.centos.org

60 participants
113 discussions

Updates for Centos3
by seth vidal 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hi Everyone, Updates for Centos3 httpd: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-349.html updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-2.0.46-38.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-38.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/mod_ssl-2.0.46-38.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/httpd-2.0.46-38.ent.centos.1.src.rpm lha: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-323.html updates/i386/RPMS/lha-1.14i-10.4.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/lha-1.14i-10.4.src.rpm rsync: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-436.html updates/i386/RPMS/rsync-2.5.7-5.3E.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/rsync-2.5.7-5.3E.src.rpm Let me know if there are any problems. To update for any of these simply run: yum update -sv

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:436-01 Updated rsync package fixes security issue Files available: rsync-2.5.7-3.21AS.1.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

Re: [Centos] is centos3.1 compatible with dag's el3 repo?]
by sophana 01 Sep '04

01 Sep '04

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Centos] is centos3.1 compatible with dag's el3 repo? Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:15:22 +0200 From: sophana <sophana78(a)yahoo.fr> To: Dag Wieers <dag(a)wieers.com> References: <412B3E8B.7020805(a)yahoo.fr> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0408241519120.6016(a)horsea.3ti.be> Dag Wieers wrote: >Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think > > CentOS 3 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U1 > CentOS 3.1 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U2 > >Although I would have prefered CentOS to follow the Red Hat numbering >instead of adding confusion. Soon U3 will be released and there will >probably be a CentOS 3.2 release. Ok I understand, I thought the RHEL2.1 has existed so I also thought that RHEL 3.1 existed also. I would also have prefered strict redhat numbering: centos 3 update2 If redhat release RHEL3.1 what will be centos name? >>For example I wish to install evms from dag's repo. Is there any problem? > >No, any problem you encounter should be reported and fixed. It is >all designed to work together. (except for kernel module packages) > evms needs a set of kernel patch to be applied. Do you think I can find one already patched or I should do it myself? If I do it, would you be interested in having the evms patched rpm? (I don't know how to do a rpm, but I can try) Is there a problem that a package depends on a kernel rpm? Regards

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss September 2004