Discuss September 2005

discuss@lists.centos.org

243 participants
335 discussions

automount[18592]: failed to mount /home/.hidden
by Allison Maury 15 Sep '05

15 Sep '05

Hi! My /var/log/messages files are being filled up with the following error... Sep 15 10:39:53 comp automount[15138]: >> mount: server:/home/.hidden failed, reason given by server: Permission denied Sep 15 10:39:53 comp automount[15138]: mount(nfs): nfs: mount failure server:/home/.hidden on /home/.hidden Sep 15 10:39:53 comp automount[15138]: failed to mount /home/.hidden What is /home/.hidden? Why can't it be mounted? And, can I simply delete it? Basically, what is this error from and how can I stop it from occurring? Thanks in advance for any help.

2 3

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4U2 timing.
by Brian T. Brunner 15 Sep '05

15 Sep '05

Also, Upi, people need more than work, they need work patterns. Making arch releases in a particular order is safer than an 'as available' order in many cases. So the particular order is 'i386 first'. If you were a (co)developer/tester/maintainer/distributor, your work pattern would be significant. So: Help row the boat, or (happily) enjoy the scenery. Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner(a)gai-tronics.com (610)796-5838 >>> Jay.Hilliard(a)disney.com 09/15/05 01:47AM >>> Pasi Pirhonen wrote: > Hi, > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:52:15PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >>We usually release our first arch (i386) with a week of the upstream >>release and our other arches within a week after the first arch release. >> > > > I find it a bit offensive when it's brough out as it is above. > It really should be 'we have a policy of releasing i386 first > even when anything else would be ready before'. > Well, I appreciate the efforts of Johnny H. and if it takes a week or two, regardless of ARCH, so be it. He's doing a lot. What happens if he needs an extended vacation? He *is* CentOS, you know (that's not sarcasm). -- Jay _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated

2 1

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 7, Issue 11
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 15 Sep '05

15 Sep '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2005:766 Important CentOS 3 ia64 squid - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 2. CESA-2005:766 Important CentOS 4 ia64 squid - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 3. CESA-2005:766 Important CentOS 3 i386 squid - security update (Tru Huynh) 4. CESA-2005:766 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 squid - security update (Tru Huynh) 5. CESA-2005:766 Important CentOS 4 s390(x) squid - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 6. CESA-2005:501 Important CentOS 3 i386 XFree86 - security update (Tru Huynh) 7. CESA-2005:501 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 XFree86 - security update (Tru Huynh) 8. CESA-2005:501 Important CentOS 3 ia64 XFree86 - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 9. CESA-2005:766 Important CentOS 4 i386 squid - security update (Johnny Hughes) 10. CESA-2005:766 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 squid - security update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:25:45 +0300 From: Pasi Pirhonen <upi(a)papat.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:766 Important CentOS 3 ia64 squid - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20050915092545.GW15823(a)core.upi.iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:766 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-766.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: files: updates/ia64/RPMS/squid-2.5.STABLE3-6.3E.14.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi(a)iki.fi - http://iki.fi/upi/

1 0

SunFire X2100 and X4100
by Chris Mauritz 15 Sep '05

15 Sep '05

Anyone seen either of these "in the wild" yet? RHEL3/RHEL4 are install options so I'm assuming CentOS will just work out of the box, but I thought I'd ask here. The 2100 seems like a viable alternative to whitebox 1RU boxes that we currently use, especially with the new dual core processors. Cheers,

4 5

Does Red Hat care about kernel bugs in CentOS?
by Greg Bailey 15 Sep '05

15 Sep '05

In the course of troubleshooting a netfilter problem, I've run into a scenario where I can reliably generate an oops with the netfilter module(s). I generally like perusing the bugs on Red Hat's bugzilla system because I can usually find solutions or patches to issues I encounter there. In this case, I couldn't. What do CentOS users do when they discover bugs? Will Red Hat consider it? Do I file it against "Red Hat Enterprise 3" if I'm running CentOS 3.5? I'm concerned if things like System.map, etc. don't match between the RHEL kernel and the CentOS kernel. Any suggestions? Thanks, Greg

2 1

Netcdf
by Sam Drinkard 15 Sep '05

15 Sep '05

Can anyone tell me if there exists an rpm for netcdf-3.6.0-p1 for Centos x86-64? Also, are there any details of what was used to compile it, i.e., ifort, pgf, g77, etc. I'm looking for a version compiled with ifort... Sam -- Snowman

4 5

RE: [CentOS] kickstart editor
by Ash Christopher 15 Sep '05

15 Sep '05

Add this to your kickstart file. #Disable SELinux (Secure Linux). selinux --disabled -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:33 PM To: centos(a)centos.org Subject: [CentOS] kickstart editor Hi, I played with the kickstart configuration editor today. (4.1) I the firewall section I dont see the controls for SELinux? AM I missing something? Where can I control that. I want to disable it in this case. Thanks, Jerry _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

1 0

kickstart editor
by Jerry Geis 15 Sep '05

15 Sep '05

Hi, I played with the kickstart configuration editor today. (4.1) I the firewall section I dont see the controls for SELinux? AM I missing something? Where can I control that. I want to disable it in this case. Thanks, Jerry

1 0

4.1 x86_64 and stability
by Ryan Lum 15 Sep '05

15 Sep '05

Dear All, I have previous posted on here before about some of the problems I have been have with various services in 4.1 particularly, PCMCIA, XFS, and Netowrk. I have a nf4x mobo with an amd semprom 3000+. The video card is an Asus radeon x500 (uses the x300 drivers). I have also tried fedora core 4 as well which the same repeatable results. Basically the problem is the services freeze when they start up, but if I removed them from init.d the computer starts fine and they start fine manually. Yet, when I get going I have several various ata errors, and lets not even think about running gnome which just locks up and hangs. My question is: is the hardware support for x86_64 as good as i386. I just installed i386 4.1 without a hang or any problems. thanks

5 6

OT - has my email domain been hijacked?
by kevin.kempter＠dataintellect.com 15 Sep '05

15 Sep '05

Returned mail: User unknown Hi List; I keep getting emails similar to the text below. I/We own the domain dataintellect.com and we have email addresses setup however I always see a bogus dataintellect.com email address as the sender. -or is this simply a random spam email? Thanks in advance for any advice... ========================================= From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON(a)aol.com> To: carina_x(a)dataintellect.com Date: Today 13:31:26 Spam Status: Spamassassin 0% probability of being spam. Full report: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=no version=3.0.4 The original message was received at Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:31:23 -0400 (EDT) from client-201.230.112.161.speedy.net.pe [201.230.112.161] *** ATTENTION *** Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section labeled: "----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----". The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section labeled: "----- Transcript of Session Follows -----". The line beginning with "<<<" describes the specific reason your e-mail could not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a general translation for other e-mail servers. Please direct further questions regarding this message to your e-mail administrator. --AOL Postmaster ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <acardi(a)cs.com> <adorablealicia(a)cs.com> <aclaudet(a)cs.com> <acarter5(a)cs.com> <acrader(a)cs.com> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to air-yg01.mail.aol.com.: >>> RCPT To:<acrader(a)cs.com> <<< 550 MAILBOX NOT FOUND 550 <acrader(a)cs.com>... User unknown >>> RCPT To:<acarter5(a)cs.com> <<< 550 MAILBOX NOT FOUND 550 <acarter5(a)cs.com>... User unknown >>> RCPT To:<aclaudet(a)cs.com> <<< 550 MAILBOX NOT FOUND 550 <aclaudet(a)cs.com>... User unknown >>> RCPT To:<adorablealicia(a)cs.com> <<< 550 MAILBOX NOT FOUND 550 <adorablealicia(a)cs.com>... User unknown >>> RCPT To:<acardi(a)cs.com> <<< 550 MAILBOX NOT FOUND 550 <acardi(a)cs.com>... User unknown unnamed Received: from client-201.230.112.161.speedy.net.pe (client-201.230.112.161.speedy.net.pe [201.230.112.161]) by rly-yg02.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINYG23-26f43287a8232f; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:31:21 -0400 Received: from mail.strawberrysampler.com ([64.118.71.80]) by 201.230.112.161 with ESMTP id 4868741; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:21:59 -0100 Received: (qmail 73986 invoked by uid 5164); Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:21:59 -0100 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:21:59 -0100 Message-ID: <20050914.68664.carina_x(a)dataintellect.com> From: "Men of Focus" <carina_x(a)dataintellect.com> Sender: carina_x(a)dataintellect.com To: acardi(a)cs.com, adorablealicia(a)cs.com, aclaudet(a)cs.com, acarter5(a)cs.com, acrader(a)cs.com X-Responder-ID: 14 Subject: Living without concerns! Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" X-AOL-IP: 201.230.112.161 X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 1:2:306687321:10737418 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 3

3 2

← Newer
1
...
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
...
34
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss September 2005