Discuss February 2006

discuss@lists.centos.org

234 participants
297 discussions

Telling software system really has 512Mb memory
by Robert Moskowitz 28 Feb '06

28 Feb '06

I am stuck in my Scalix install. It checks for 512Mb memory. At some point I am suppose to get the extra memory, but for now I am stuck at 256Mb. Is there some system value that I can set so that the installer is led to believe there is 512Mb of memory, so I can at least get this stuff installed?

5 6

Possible missing packages?
by Chris Weisiger 28 Feb '06

28 Feb '06

Is there an rpm package for the latest kernel-source? What about perl-CGI I did a search and install using yum and nothing was returned? This seems kind of odd? Any ideas?

3 2

In over my head -- sorry
by Robert Moskowitz 28 Feb '06

28 Feb '06

I got in over my head. jpackage was/is too much for me at this time. Maybe for a long time. Sorry for diverting your efforts to try and help me. I only want to run SCALIX CE on this system. It needs the jdk and tomcat. But if you look: http://www.scalix.com/community/viewtopic.php?t=516&highlight=centos A number have gotten it running just fine with the 'broken' sun stuff. Perhaps Scalix is not so 'demanding'. So I am following instructions from above URL. I did learn a lot here, making up for some of the implied steps in the instructions. Perhaps I will have to do a complete reinstall of Centos to get out of the jpackage mess I might be in. Well I REALLY should learn Kickstart, and perhaps I will do that for this system! Again you are all a great help. If you need some crypto help. 802.11i or such, that is where I 'live'. Well at least I help right the specs. Someelse has to code them! Barrs Law of Recursive futility If you're smart enough to use one of these.... .....you can probably manage without one!

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Resolving Dependencies
by Robert Moskowitz 28 Feb '06

28 Feb '06

At 03:21 PM 2/27/2006, Jim Perrin wrote: >On 2/27/06, Robert Moskowitz <rgm(a)htt-consult.com> wrote: > > I am getting the following errors and don't know how/what to check to > > learn which rpm they are in... > > > > ---> Package java-1.4.2-sun-devel.i586 0:1.4.2.10-1jpp set to be updated > > ---> Package java-1.4.2-sun.i586 0:1.4.2.10-1jpp set to be updated > > --> Running transaction check > > --> Processing Dependency: libjvm.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) for package: > > java-1.4.2-sun > > --> Processing Dependency: libnet.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) for package: > > java-1.4.2-sun > > --> Processing Dependency: libjava.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) for package: > > java-1.4.2-sun > > --> Processing Dependency: libverify.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) for package: > > java-1.4.2-sun > > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > > Error: Missing Dependency: libjvm.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) is needed by > > package java-1.4.2-sun > > Error: Missing Dependency: libnet.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) is needed by > > package java-1.4.2-sun > > Error: Missing Dependency: libjava.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) is needed by > > package java-1.4.2-sun > > Error: Missing Dependency: libverify.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) is needed by > > package java-1.4.2-sun > >This is a jpackage issue, and is specific to their rpms. I assume you >rebuilt their nosrc rpm for sun java. If this is the case, it's a bug >with internal java dependency tracking. rpm -qpl the rebuilt rpms to >see that libjava.so, libnet.so etc are there. If they are, then you >can safely (THIS TIME ONLY) install with --nodeps. Since this is a >jpackage issue, you might want to ask them about it, as they may have >a more authoritative answer. I get: rpm -qpl java-1.4.2-sun-1.4.2.10-1jpp.i586.rpm | grep "libjava.so" /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-sun-1.4.2.10/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so So does that mean that it is on my system and something is not going right with this rpm when I do a yum -y install? I could not figure out what google was telling me. Nor that rpmfind site. I will see what the jpackage people have to say. >See https://www.zarb.org/pipermail/jpackage-discuss/2005-April/007836.html >for further info. (google should be your friend) > > >-- >"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary >safety deserve neither liberty nor safety'' >Benjamin Franklin 1775 >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS(a)centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

3 2

Resolving Dependencies
by Robert Moskowitz 28 Feb '06

28 Feb '06

I am getting the following errors and don't know how/what to check to learn which rpm they are in... ---> Package java-1.4.2-sun-devel.i586 0:1.4.2.10-1jpp set to be updated ---> Package java-1.4.2-sun.i586 0:1.4.2.10-1jpp set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libjvm.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) for package: java-1.4.2-sun --> Processing Dependency: libnet.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) for package: java-1.4.2-sun --> Processing Dependency: libjava.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) for package: java-1.4.2-sun --> Processing Dependency: libverify.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) for package: java-1.4.2-sun --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libjvm.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) is needed by package java-1.4.2-sun Error: Missing Dependency: libnet.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) is needed by package java-1.4.2-sun Error: Missing Dependency: libjava.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) is needed by package java-1.4.2-sun Error: Missing Dependency: libverify.so(SUNWprivate_1.1) is needed by package java-1.4.2-sun

4 5

Mouse hour glass and desktop
by BRUCE STANLEY 27 Feb '06

27 Feb '06

What does it mean when your mouse hour glass pointer turns into a skull and cross bones symbol for a few seconds and is then followed by your desktop icons being scrambled around to different locations. This reminds me of a bug in the old Windows 98 SE desktop. What would cause this? This has happened to me once before on Fedora 3 (I think, maybe 2).

2 2

Sendmail.cf / access.db
by Sam Drinkard 27 Feb '06

27 Feb '06

I've noticed from the sendmail logs, certain IP's are being blocked via the known spammers configuration in the sendmail.cf. What I also note is in my access file, I have several TLD's that are listed, yet are NOT being blocked. Yes, I do call a make after each edit of the access list, and going by the timestamp on access.db, it appears to being updated, yet again, in the sendmail portion of the daily logs, those TLD's which are in the access list are not listed as being blocked. Hope that is not too confusing.. think I confused myself, but in any case, things are in there that should be blocked and are not being. Hints? Sam

4 8

RE: [CentOS] Motherboard recommendations
by Bowie Bailey 27 Feb '06

27 Feb '06

Dan Trainor wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > I have been building my systems with Abit IS-10 motherboards, but > > NewEgg has stopped carrying them, so I need to switch to something > > new. > > > > Does anyone have any recommendations on a solid motherboard that > > works well with CentOS? I need a motherboard with built-in video, > > LAN, and SATA. I don't need RAID or any other fancy features, just > > something cheap and solid. > > > > I've been looking around, but there are lots of boards that look > > like they would work and I know nothing about any of them. I was > > just wondering what you guys are using. > > This might be out of your target price range, but we just received 32 > Intel SR1425BK1-E based systems a few weeks ago, and to tell you the > truth, they're the most rock-solid motherboards I've ever used. > Period. > > Looks like the board alone will run anywhere between $450-500 USD, but > my experience tells me that it was well worth it. > > You can find more information here: > > http://www.intel.com/design/servers/boards/SE7221BK1-E/index.htm > > They've been running CentOS 4.2 flawlessly for about two weeks now > under extremely heavy load, and we haven't seen any problems. Yea... That's a bit out of my price range. I'm looking for cheap boards. -- Bowie

3 3

Snare
by Chris Mason (Lists) 27 Feb '06

27 Feb '06

What is the function of the snare daemon? I just found it on a machine and never heard of it before. -- Chris Mason NetConcepts (264) 497-5670 Fax: (264) 497-8463 Int: (305) 704-7249 Fax: (815)301-9759 UK 44.207.183.0271 Cell: 264-235-5670 Yahoo IM: netconcepts_anguilla(a)yahoo.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

3 2

lsraid on centos 4.2
by Jerry Geis 27 Feb '06

27 Feb '06

On older systems redhat 9 there was a command lsraid.... I have a centos 4.2 system that does not have that command. What is the new command that is equivalent to "lsraid -a /dev/md0"? Or is there a package that does not get loaded by default? Lsraid is not on my system. THanks, jerry

2 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
30
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss February 2006