Discuss January 2007

discuss@lists.centos.org

245 participants
264 discussions

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 23, Issue 1
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 04 Jan '07

04 Jan '07

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2007:0001 Important CentOS 3 i386 openoffice.org - security update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2007:0001 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 openoffice.org - security update (Tru Huynh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 15:55:30 +0100 From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0001 Important CentOS 3 i386 openoffice.org - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20070104145530.GA2755(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:0001 openoffice.org security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0001.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/openoffice.org-1.1.2-35.2.0.EL3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/openoffice.org-i18n-1.1.2-35.2.0.EL3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/openoffice.org-libs-1.1.2-35.2.0.EL3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/openoffice.org-1.1.2-35.2.0.EL3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update openoffice.org\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

RE: [CentOS] tail -f /var/log/maillog error
by Robert Becker Cope 04 Jan '07

04 Jan '07

"Indunil Jayasooriya" <indunil75(a)gmail.com> wrote: > When I type the below command, it shows the logs for mail. > tail -f /var/log/maillog > > But , Since this morning, It shows nothing. Did you leave this running overnight? If so, your logs may have rotated, and you are no longer "tailing" the right file. robert

2 1

nxml-mode package?
by Jordi Espasa Clofent 04 Jan '07

04 Jan '07

Hello, ¿Is there some intention to include nxml-mode package in some official repo? I use it frequently in documentation edition. Despite of that, I've installed the package available in http://people.redhat.com/twaugh/ftp/docbook/nxml-mode/nxml-mode-0.20041004.… and it seems work fine.

1 0

I don't see my messages
by Jordi Espasa Clofent 03 Jan '07

03 Jan '07

Hi all, Recently I've suffered a problem with my SMTP service provider. It seems the SMTP server allows open relay, so my account is lockdown by CentOS list policy. Because of that I desubscribe my last account and re-subscribe in CentOS list with the present gmail account. I can send any messages in the list, but the curious problem is I don't see my own messages ¿?¿? I can see my sended messages in CentOS mail archive but not in my email client (ThunderBird). -- Jordi Espasa Clofent PGP id 0xC5ABA76A #http://pgp.mit.edu/ FSF Associate Member id 4281 #http://www.fsf.org/

8 9

tftp times out
by Mark Snyder 03 Jan '07

03 Jan '07

tftp keeps timing out when I try to transfer files. I intend to use tftp with G4U to clone a standard workstation. I am testing it between two Dell poweredge servers running CentOS 4.3. "chkconfig --list |grep tftp" shows tftp up and running on both boxes. When connected "tftp>status" shows it is talking to the other box "tptp>trace" shows "sent WRQ <file=slavelit, mode=netascii>" and ends with Transfer timed out. I have tftp is being run under xinetd. I have modified /etc/xinetd.d/tftpd as follows: server_args -p -c -U 002 -u install -s /tster I have setup a user install, set read/write privileges on /tster which is owned by install Not sure what else I need to do to get this working, any suggestions would be appreciated Mark Snyder JMK Computerized TDIS Urbana, IL 61802

6 10

IPVS connections not removed
by Sébastien AVELINE 03 Jan '07

03 Jan '07

3 7

PDFlib?
by Mike Kercher 02 Jan '07

02 Jan '07

I'm trying to create pdf's on the fly with php, but I'm getting errors such as: Fatal error: Call to undefined function: pdf_new() I tried installing pdflib from dag, but I think I'm missing something to plug it into php. Has anyone done this? Mike

3 5

zip alternative?
by Jordi Espasa Clofent 02 Jan '07

02 Jan '07

Hi, Recently I've got several errors in one of my backups systems. The backup system uses basic tools: rsync, mysqldump, and zip and have worked fine until a few days ago. The zip command shows an error like this: size limit exceeded. So I've found out an alernative : p7zip. It seems to has all the needed features: * available package (in Dag's repo) * 64 bits for size (http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3031109) * support several compression format ¿What do you know about this tool? TIA. -- Jordi Espasa Clofent PGP id 0xC5ABA76A #http://pgp.mit.edu/ FSF Associate Member id 4281 #http://www.fsf.org/

3 4

RE: [CentOS] disabling prelink?
by Justin Randall 02 Jan '07

02 Jan '07

This document may be helpful. http://people.redhat.com/jakub/prelink.pdf Regards, Justin. -----Original Message----- From: Aleksandar Milivojevic [mailto:alex@milivojevic.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 11:14 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] disabling prelink? What are the pros and cons of disabling prelinking in CentOS 4? From what I understand, prelinking is ment to be performance improvement (faster loading time for binaries). I can see some potential benefit on workstations where many different processes are started frequently. But how big is that benefit in real life? Would I slow down things noticably if there is no prelinking? Is there any benefit at all of having prelinking on a server box that runs couple of daemons which are started only at boot time, and then they either use threads or fork themself to handle requests? In either case, such processes are fully (or at least mostly) linked at boot time. For example servers running stuff like Sendmail or Postfix, Dovecot or Cyrus-IMAPD, Squid, MySQL, LDAP and such. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

1 0

disabling prelink?
by Aleksandar Milivojevic 02 Jan '07

02 Jan '07

What are the pros and cons of disabling prelinking in CentOS 4? From what I understand, prelinking is ment to be performance improvement (faster loading time for binaries). I can see some potential benefit on workstations where many different processes are started frequently. But how big is that benefit in real life? Would I slow down things noticably if there is no prelinking? Is there any benefit at all of having prelinking on a server box that runs couple of daemons which are started only at boot time, and then they either use threads or fork themself to handle requests? In either case, such processes are fully (or at least mostly) linked at boot time. For example servers running stuff like Sendmail or Postfix, Dovecot or Cyrus-IMAPD, Squid, MySQL, LDAP and such.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss January 2007