Discuss May 2007

discuss@lists.centos.org

345 participants
442 discussions

Debugging sendmail
by Todd Cary 05 May '07

05 May '07

I have Centos 4 running on my server. During bootup, it hangs on the starting of sendmail. When I use the GUI interface to check what services are running, sendmail is shown to be running. However, if I try a restart, it just hangs. If I try to send mail with the php sendmail, it times out. My Linux skills are limited, so I am not sure what steps I should follow to debug the problem. Any suggestions are welcomed... Todd -- Ariste Software 2200 D Street Ext Petaluma, CA 94952 (707) 773-4523

2 1

Stumped: kernel 2.6.18-8 source doesn't build???
by Mark Hull-Richter 04 May '07

04 May '07

I installed the kernel-2.6.18-8.el5.src.rpm today and went to build it, but it fails with this error: $ rpmbuild -bp --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec Building target platforms: x86_64 Building for target x86_64 error: Failed build dependencies: unifdef is needed by kernel-2.6.18-8.el5.x86_64 I double checked and this appears to be the latest kernel source rpm on centos/5.0/os/SRPMS. I googled around a bit and didn't see any simple solution to this, although I can't help but feel that there is one - is there, or do I need to do some serious patching here? $ ls -l kernel-2.6.18-8.el5.src.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 mhr users 48134078 Apr 12 13:16 kernel-2.6.18-8.el5.src.rpm $ uname -a Linux mhullrichter 2.6.18-8.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Mon Apr 9 09:43:24 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Thanks -- Mark Hull-Richter DATAllegro (www.datallegro.com) 85 Enterprise, Second Floor, Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 949-680-3082 - Office 949-330-7691 - fax

4 6

Re: [CentOS] Stumped: kernel 2.6.18-8 source doesn't build???
by notaneck carfan 04 May '07

04 May '07

>On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 02:08:46PM -0700, Mark Hull-Richter wrote: >> I installed the kernel-2.6.18-8.el5.src.rpm today and went to build >> it, but it fails with this error: >> >> $ rpmbuild -bp --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec >> Building target platforms: x86_64 >> Building for target x86_64 >> error: Failed build dependencies: >> unifdef is needed by kernel-2.6.18-8.el5.x86_64 >> >> I double checked and this appears to be the latest kernel source rpm >> on centos/5.0/os/SRPMS. I googled around a bit and didn't see any >> simple solution to this, although I can't help but feel that there is >> one - is there, or do I need to do some serious patching here? >yum -y install unifdef did you leave off the "Duhh" ? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

4 3

Evolution and MIME digests
by Ioannis Vranos 04 May '07

04 May '07

Is there anyone here using evolution with MIME digests successfully? MIME digests don't work OK with thunderbird so far.

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Installing from a custom kernel
by notaneck carfan 04 May '07

04 May '07

>Since the built in kernel doesn't have the raid10 module for some >reason, I would like to custom compile a kernel that does, and install >with it. How would I go about doing this? Roll your own linux distro. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

RealPlayer
by Ioannis Vranos 04 May '07

04 May '07

OS: CentOS 5 x86. Hi, I have installed RealPlayer via RealPlayer10GOLD.bin (no rpm). Does anyone know how can I uninstall it except from manually erasing files myself?

5 6

CentOS 5 + Nforce 4 SLI Intel SATA problems
by Varian 04 May '07

04 May '07

I've been having an extremely hard time using the on board SATA controller on my nvidia based board. I have two 160gig Maxtor SATA drives attached to the on board controller, setup as software raid0. The problem is the array is extremely unreliable, where I'm getting constant I/O errors like: sd 0:0:0:0: SCSI error: return code = 0x00040000 end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 20010007 sd 0:0:0:0: SCSI error: return code = 0x00040000 end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 20010000 I've wiped and scanned the drives with the Maxtor diagnostic utilities which passes both drives with flying colors. I've had no issues when i was doing the same thing with Suse 10.1, the same setup was 100% reliable. I also have two 160gig Maxtor ATA133 drive in the machine on the on board PATA controller and they work totally reliable. I'm wondering if anyone else is having a problem with on board nvidia sata controller thats part of the nforce4 chipset? btw its using the sata_nv driver. Also when I reboot it works fine for a few hours and then begins to act up again. Its not a heat problem, the drives have a working fan directly blowing on the drives, and the case its in has very good airflow. ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x9F0 ctl 0xBF2 bmdma 0xD000 irq 193 ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x970 ctl 0xB72 bmdma 0xD008 irq 193 scsi0 : sata_nv ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) ata1.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 320173056 sectors: LBA48 ata1.00: ata1: dev 0 multi count 16 ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133 scsi1 : sata_nv ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) ata2.00: ATA-7, max UDMA/133, 320173056 sectors: LBA48 ata2.00: ata2: dev 0 multi count 16 ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133 Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6Y160M0 Rev: YAR5 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sda: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) sda: Write Protect is off sda: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back SCSI device sda: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) sda: Write Protect is off sda: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sda: drive cache: write back sda: sda1 sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6Y160M0 Rev: YAR5 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 SCSI device sdb: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) sdb: Write Protect is off sdb: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back SCSI device sdb: 320173056 512-byte hdwr sectors (163929 MB) sdb: Write Protect is off sdb: Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back sdb: sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdb ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APSJ] enabled at IRQ 22 GSI 17 sharing vector 0xC9 and IRQ 17 ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:11.0[A] -> Link [APSJ] -> GSI 22 (level, low) -> IRQ 201 PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:11.0 to 64 ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x9E0 ctl 0xBE2 bmdma 0xE400 irq 201 ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x960 ctl 0xB62 bmdma 0xE408 irq 201 scsi2 : sata_nv ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) scsi3 : sata_nv ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) Varian

3 2

Blocking radio streaming
by Mário Gamito 04 May '07

04 May '07

Hi, I'm the system's administrator at my company. All servers are CentOS :) I've been noticing that many people spend the whole day hearing to online radios. How can i block the streaming ? It's HTTP and i think it's through port 80. Any help would be appreciated. Warm Regards, Mário Gamito PS: No good blocking the radio sites, they'll discover others.

7 7

Re: [CentOS] New lists
by Mailing Lists 04 May '07

04 May '07

Message: 41 Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 20:50:22 +0200 From: Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos(a)br-online.de> Subject: Re: [CentOS] New lists To: centos(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20070501185020.GA1105(a)br-online.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >This size is set fairly huge, so it never seems to be reached - 30 MB. >That's why you're only seeing daily digests. I think this number could >be set much lower if digest subscribers want to have that. >So other digest subscribers: Speak up! Ralph: Like John, I'm on a very slow dial-up connection. I'm a Digest subscriber. I have *no* complaints about the current mailing list. I only want one digest a day, and, frequently, I'm not online every day. Much of the traffic on this list is above my head, but, I learn from it! I *deeply* appreciate the very knowledgeable people sharing their time and knowledge with the newbies! After having Broadband (Cable Modem), for 3+ years in Cali, going back to a modem was a PITA. Been waiting for WiMAX, which is available in Cali, but still is not available in our town, a few miles away. Guess I will go with ADSL. Lanny in Colombia

1 0

RE: SCSI Raid controller
by bm 04 May '07

04 May '07

Hi All, I have some old HP Netserver LPr¹s that have old HP RAID controllers (NetRAID 3si¹s). The RAID controllers don¹t work too well with CentOS. I¹ve not been able to get the installer to see the controllers. I¹ve read a lot of notes that don¹t seem to point to me having any success. So 2 questions. Has anyone successfully used NetRAID 3si controllers with CentOS? Can anyone recommend an alternative controller that would play nicer with the OS? I¹m shooting for RAID1 only. Thanks Brian

2 1

← Newer
1
...
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
...
45
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss May 2007