Discuss July 2007

discuss@lists.centos.org

268 participants
324 discussions

php-suhosin-0.9.20 in the testing repository
by Johnny Hughes 28 Jul '07

28 Jul '07

All, I have just put 3 versions of php-suhosin-0.9.20 in the Testing repository for various versions of CentOS. From the Suhosin website: Suhosin is an advanced protection system for PHP installations. It was designed to protect servers and users from known and unknown flaws in PHP applications and the PHP core. More Suhosin info: http://www.hardened-php.net/suhosin/ Suhosin Configuration: http://www.hardened-php.net/suhosin/configuration.html ===================================================================== The files are: CentOS-4 (will go in C4 extras ... built against php-4.3.9 of CentOS-4 Base): php-suhosin-0.9.20-1.i386.rpm php-suhosin-0.9.20-1.src.rpm php-suhosin-0.9.20-1.x86_64.rpm CentOS-4 Plus (will go in CentOS-4 Plus ... built against the CentOS WebStack php-5.1.6 in C4 CentOSPlus): php-suhosin-0.9.20-1.el4.centos.plus.i386.rpm php-suhosin-0.9.20-1.el4.centos.plus.src.rpm php-suhosin-0.9.20-1.el4.centos.plus.x86_64.rpm These RPMS are in the C4 testing repo here: http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/ Tracker: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2236 ===================================================================== CentOS-5 (will go in C5 extras ... built against php-5.1.6 in CentOS-5): php-suhosin-0.9.20-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm php-suhosin-0.9.20-1.el5.centos.src.rpm php-suhosin-0.9.20-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm These files are in the C5 testing repo here: http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/ Tracker: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2235 ===================================================================== I would appreciate it if we can get these tested so we can move them into extras or plus as applicable. Please post all comments to the trackers listed above for each version. Thanks (and happy php security :D), Johnny Hughes

1 0

Re: sono in ferie dal 28-8-2007 al 5-8-2007
by webmaster＠3vit.it 28 Jul '07

28 Jul '07

sono in ferie dal 28-8-2007 al 5-8-2007 mi trovate in ufficio dal 6 al 10 agosto luigi mangili

1 0

httpd failed with a new install of 5.0
by Gregory P. Ennis 28 Jul '07

28 Jul '07

Everyone, I have been working on a new installation of CentOS 5.0 on a x86_64 machine. The installation has gone well except for httpd. When I start httpd with LogLevel turned to debug all I get is an immediate failure with the following errors the logs: /var/log/httpd/error_log: [Sun Jul 22 13:00:31 2007] [notice] suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec) /var/log/ssl_error.log: [Sun Jul 22 13:04:32 2007] [warn] RSA server certificate is a CA certificate (BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?) [Sun Jul 22 13:04:32 2007] [warn] RSA server certificate CommonName (CN) `localhost.localdomain' does NOT match server name!? [Sun Jul 22 13:04:32 2007] [error] Unable to configure RSA server private key [Sun Jul 22 13:04:32 2007] [error] SSL Library Error: 185073780 error:0B080074:x509 certificate routines:X509_check_private_key:key values mismatch The ssl errors were present on the old system so I was not too worried about those. I turned off selinux with out a change in symptoms. I get the same errors whether I start the service via "service httpd start" or "httpd". When I use "httpd -E /tmp/errors.txt" the errors.txt file is created, but is empty. "httpd -t" responds with "Syntax OK" I have done a yum remove of the web server module, and have done a re-install using yum without a change in symptoms. I have not been able to figure out how to get more data in the logs; httpd seems to be failing too soon to record much. Anyone's ideas would sure be appreciated !!! Greg Ennis

3 4

setroubleshoot w/o X?
by drew einhorn 28 Jul '07

28 Jul '07

Hi, I recently discovered setroubleshoot, a wonderful tool that helps diagnose and resolve selinux problems, even if you really do not understand selinux. I need to read up on selinux and get to where I understand it much better. I'm wondering if there is a text only version of setroubleshoot that runs on a minimal server configuration without X installed? -- Drew Einhorn

3 3

RE: [CentOS] Is installonly option needed?
by Bowie Bailey 28 Jul '07

28 Jul '07

Brent L. Bates wrote: > I made the mistake of updating a kernel once instead of > installing it. If one upgrades a kernel and there is a problem, one > can't easily go back to the old one. If one installs a new one, then > one can quickly and easily go back to the old one as you have BOTH > kernels available. A quick reboot and one can select the working > kernel. I always install kernels now instead of updating them. I understand the need to install rather than update kernels. Yum does this automatically for kernel, kernel-smp, kernel-bigmem, kernel-enterprise, kernel-debug, and kernel-unsupported. Wait...I had the files backwards. The NEW version of the yum.conf has the installonly line I was wondering about. I thought it was something that I might have done previously, but apparently it's a new default setting in the yum package. In that case, I'll just use the new one. Sorry for the confusion. -- Bowie

1 0

SOLVED: Re: [CentOS] KStars on CentOS 4.4?
by Lanny Marcus 28 Jul '07

28 Jul '07

I was able to install the kdeedu RPM, from the Fedora Core 3 Install DVD, without any problem, on my CentOS 4.4 box and KStars is up and running and has been updated. :-) The bad news is that I didn't learn anything, by doing it this quick and simple way, so now I'm going to begin reading about creating my own RPMs. When I get the CentOS 5.0 install DVD, that will be another issue for getting KStars installed. Thanks to those who responded! KStars is a very powerful and a very elegant program, for anyone interested in Astronomy. Lanny

2 1

Best way to have Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 on Centos 4.4?
by M. Fioretti 27 Jul '07

27 Jul '07

Greetings, I would like to install Postfix 2.3 or 2.4 (I need support for SASL authentication via Dovecot) on a Centos 4.4 server. I have already found rpm packages at http://postfix.wl0.org/en/available-packages/ and pages about using the centosplus repo for postfix. Before launching rpm or yum, however, I'd like to ask the list which way you think is the best way to do this. By "best" I mean the way which: * has no known issues, gotchas, extra configuration tricks... * has as little extra dependencies as possible * can be maintained/upgraded with yum Thank you in advance for any feedback! Marco -- The Family Guide to Digital Freedom: http://digifreedom.net

4 5

Is installonly option needed?
by Bowie Bailey 27 Jul '07

27 Jul '07

I just updated to the most recent version of yum. I noticed that my yum.conf file had changed. The old one has: installonlypkgs=kernel kernel-smp kernel-devel kernel-smp-devel kernel-largesmp kernel-largesmp-devel kernel-hugemem kernel-hugemem-devel The new one does not have this option listed. I don't remember if that was a default setting or if I added it in. Do I need that line to be there? I noticed that without it, yum will perform an update on kernel-hugemem-devel and kernel-smp-devel. Is this a problem? Thanks, -- Bowie

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Re: KStars on CentOS 4.4?
by Lanny Marcus 27 Jul '07

27 Jul '07

On 26 July 2007, Scott Silva wrote: > IF it is in Fedora 6, it might be available for Centos 5, or you might > be able to re-compile the src rpm. Scott: This is going to be a huge *LEARNING* experience for me! :-) Many *newbie* questions here: Will it be better for me to get KStars only, from the KStars web site, which comes with a warning (see below), or from Fedora, which is much closer to CentOS? The problem is that it normally is inside the KDE Edutainment RPM and if I get it from Fedora, it will probably be inside that. If I get the KDE Edutainment SRC RPM from Fedora, which version of Fedora should I get it from for CentOS 4.4? (You wrote FC6 for CentOS 5). The kdeedu RPM is not on the CentOS 4.4 DVD. I'm assuming it's not on the CentOS 5.0 DVD, but I don't have that yet. If I'm able to make an RPM for KStars only, I would not plan to install kdeedu later. However, I suspect there may be dependency issues, with other KDE stuff, etc. There is *no* way I will be able to get my wife to use CentOS on her box, if she cannot use KStars! Even my 6 year old daughter wanted to use KStars last night, so her box is another demanding KStars user. TIA, Lanny in Colombia http://edu.kde.org/kstars/ > Download: > The official version of KStars is the version shipped with the KDE > Edutainment module. However, we also offer an independent tarball of > the KStars code for download. Our latest release is based on the > KDE_3_5_BRANCH codebase, shortly after KDE 3.5.2 was tagged. > > kstars-1.2.tar.bz2 (7 MB) > > (this is an indirect link, so don't use "Save link as...") > > You may also be interested in our periodic SVN snapshot releases, or > perhaps you'd like to download the SVN code directly. > > Note on version numbers: the last tarball release was called "3.3 > snapshot", but the internal version of that release was 1.0.x. We have > decided to return to using our internal version numbers for these > tarball releases. Sorry for any confusion. > > Note to packagers: If your distribution normally ships a kdeedu > package, rather than individual packages for each app, please do not > package this release. If a user installs a kstars-only package, they > may have problems trying to install a kdeedu package later.

2 1

Sound setup on ASUS laptop (Intel High Definition soundcard)
by Niki Kovacs 27 Jul '07

27 Jul '07

Hi, I just got a brand-new ASUS laptop, a W6F light laptop. So far I managed to get everything to work (wireless, X, ...). The only thing that stubbornly refuses to work is the sound. Here's the sound card: # lspci | grep -i audio 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller (rev 02) I googled quite a bit for this. Some folks suggested to put an addition options line in /etc/modprobe.conf. Here are some of the suggestions: options snd-hda-intel model=asus ... or: options snd-hda-intel model=asus-laptop ... or: options snd-hda-intel position_fix=1 model=asus I tried all these (and duly rebooted after each attempt), but to no avail. Usually, to test the sound, I open a terminal and try to play one of the test sounds in /usr/share/sounds/alsa with the command-line 'aplay'. Anyone got that sound card to work? Any suggestions? I'm quite clueless. Cheers, Niki

1 0

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
33
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss July 2007