Discuss October 2008

discuss@lists.centos.org

298 participants
291 discussions

OT: reset IBM Bladecenter AMM web access
by fajarpri＠cbn.net.id 26 Oct '08

26 Oct '08

Hi all, Sorry for the OT. Does anyone can share to how to reset an IBM Bladecenter Advance Management Module web access? Recently, I've got an IBM Bladecenter chassis E 8677. There's no one in the office who knows about the IP nor the password for it. Thank you, -- Fajar Priyanto | Reg'd Linux User #327841 | Linux tutorial http://linux2.arinet.org 13:10:54 up 5:02, 2.6.24-18-generic GNU/Linux Let's use OpenOffice. http://www.openoffice.org The real challenge of teaching is getting your students motivated to learn.

6 7

Re: [CentOS] Re: Ole Fossils [ was Re: ls and rm: "argument list too long"]
by Steven Vishoot 26 Oct '08

26 Oct '08

----- Original Message ---- > From: David G. Mackay <mackay_d(a)bellsouth.net> > To: CentOS mailing list <centos(a)centos.org> > Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2008 4:18:01 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: Ole Fossils [ was Re: ls and rm: "argument list too long"] > > > On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 12:10 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote: > > > My first Burroughs experience was on the B-5500, and it had some > > ``interesting'' quirks. Using Burroughs extended ALGOL, one could do what > > they called array row writes to very efficiently write large chunks of > > memory with a single hardware command. The hitch was that if one tried to > > write more than 1024 48bit words, it would crash the entire system, with a > > side effect of losing the accounting information for all running programs, > > which could be useful when paying $750/hour for time sharing :-). > > I'm surprised that the bug lasted very long, or did it just go > unreported? ;) > > > Are you retired Air Farce? A fair number of Burroughs field engineers had > > learned the Burroughs equipment in the AF (and could afford to work at BGH > > low pay because of their retirement pay). > > No, I was just young and foolish. Then someone explained that Burroughs > wanted to get their techs hired away by the customers. They'd most > likely continue to support Burroughs equipment, but on someone else's > nickel. > > > One might say that I worked for Burroughs too as I debugged their Remote > > Job Entry (RJE) software for Medium systems, including patching MCP, > > because the company I worked for needed it to work. I talked Burroughs out > > of the source code for RJE and the current version of MCP so that I could > > fix things. After I sent them the fixes, I never had any problem getting > > anything I asked for. > > It's impressive that you managed to talk them out of the source, and > that you fixed it. > > > FWIW, the entire source code listing for MCP fit in a single file drawer. > > Reading the comments in the code, it was obvious that a very small group of > > people worked on it which resulted in quite nice integration and > > consistency. > > Legend had it that the medium systems MCP was mostly written by one guy > who lived in a beach house in California with two women. > > > Can you imagine`Microsoft making the source code for Windows available to a > > small customer for free, and with no NDA so the customer could fix a > > problem that was critical to them? Even if they supplied the source, do > > you think anybody could figure it out? > > Well, I did have a go at their Device Driver kit at one point. > Convoluted is the first printable word that comes to mind. > > > One of the most important features of open source software is the > > availability of the source code so people can quickly fix bugs critical to > > them or add features they need. As an example, in January 2000, groff had > > a y2k problem with dates which I found printing a letter that needed to go > > out. It took me about 15 minutes to find the problem in the code, fix it, > > and send that patch back to the maintainers. Imagine how long it would > > take to get a similar problem fixed in M$-Word. > > Yes. Trying to support a black box (It took YEARS before they released > the source code to the B1xx systems to their support employees outside > of the plant) made me a firm believer in open source. > > Dave > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Gees i feel like i am at an ole farts convention, with this thread. :-D

2 1

rsync mirroring
by David Hláčik 26 Oct '08

26 Oct '08

Hello guys, we have a production server named prod-server we have a mirror server named storage-server . I want to mirror a downloadsite on production server to a mirror server , but i want to keep all files from production server on mirror server . More explicitly. If i will have a file named "myproduct.exe" on production server , which is allready mirrored on mirror server , and i will delete it on production server, i want to have an original file renamed to myproduct.exe_DATE_OF_DELETION and then new myproduct.exe normally mirrored as before. Basically - I want to backup all changes I am syncing using rsync -avz ......... Should i add --backup --suffix = $(date) and thats it? Thanks in advance! David

2 1

GIMP 2.4 packages for CentOS 5
by Niki Kovacs 26 Oct '08

26 Oct '08

Hi, One of my rare regrets with CentOS 5 was that GIMP only came in version 2.2, but 2.4 offers many nifty new functions quite handy for everyday work. For those of you who are interested, I built some GIMP 2.4 packages for CentOS 5. Download and install (using rpm -Uvh) the following packages: http://download.tuxfamily.org/centos/5/os/i386/RPMS/gimp-2.4.6-1.zzz.i386.r… http://download.tuxfamily.org/centos/5/os/i386/RPMS/gimp-libs-2.4.6-1.zzz.i… http://download.tuxfamily.org/centos/5/os/i386/RPMS/gtk2-2.10.14-4.zzz.i386… http://download.tuxfamily.org/centos/5/os/i386/RPMS/libexif-0.6.15-3.zzz.i3… http://download.tuxfamily.org/centos/5/os/i386/RPMS/pygtk2-2.10.6-1.zzz.i38… http://download.tuxfamily.org/centos/5/os/i386/RPMS/pygtk2-codegen-2.10.6-1… http://download.tuxfamily.org/centos/5/os/i386/RPMS/pygtk2-libglade-2.10.6-… Runs nice and doesn't wreck anything :o) Enjoy! Niki

2 1

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 44, Issue 15
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 25 Oct '08

25 Oct '08

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2008:0946 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 ed - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 2. CESA-2008:0896 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 ruby - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 3. CESA-2008:0946 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 ed - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 4. CESA-2008:0897 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 ruby - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 5. CESA-2008:0946 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) ed - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 6. CESA-2008:0896 Moderate CentOS 3 s390(x) ruby - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 7. CESA-2008:0946 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) ed - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 8. CESA-2008:0897 Moderate CentOS 4 s390(x) ruby - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:46:02 +0300 From: Pasi Pirhonen <upi(a)centos.fi> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2008:0946 Moderate CentOS 3 ia64 ed - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20081024174602.GK5793(a)centos.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0946 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0946.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/ed-0.2-33.30E.1.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi(a)iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored

1 0

Help with a sun cobalt with sendmail and centos with postfix
by Erick Perez 25 Oct '08

25 Oct '08

Hi, I have a customer with a sun cobalt running Sendmail 8.10.2/8.10.2 and we are phasing out the sun cube due to some limitations. So we have installed a new centos 5.x server. the format of our current emails are username(a)domain.com and the new format will be name.lastname(a)domain.com. We have 1600 accounts. Both server are in the LAN. The MX record that the world sees, point to our current AV/AntiSpam appliance, then our AV appliance forwards to the mail server (its a trendmicro IMSS) The AV appliance lets me define rules that emails for username(a)domain.com should be sent to the mailserver with the cube, and it also let me define a rule for name.lastname(a)domain.com to be sent to the centos machine, so I have covered the "from internet" inbound email issue. going out to the internet, both servers can send emails perfectly. However, Since both servers will "answer" to the same domain, i need some guidance as to how to 1- If user hosted on the Sun sendmail Cube sends emails to name.lastname(a)domain.com, make the Cube forward/send the email to the Centos machine. 2- If user hosted in centos, sends email to username(a)domain.com, make the POSTFIX forward/send the email to the Cube machine. Due to internal regulations i must say that: 1- users cannot be moved all at once. 2- centos machine must use postfix - not sendmail. I can however, install sendmail on centos and make it listen in another port other than 25 if some solution arises that needs sendmail in both sides. Anyways, any guidance as to how to solve this mess is welcomed!!!! Thanks, -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Erick Perez Panama Sistemas Integradores de Telefonia IP y Soluciones Para Centros de Datos Panama, Republica de Panama Cel Panama. +(507) 6694-4780 ------------------------------------------------------------

5 7

firefox is incredibly unstable
by sbeam 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

does anyone else have major probs with Firefox as installed on CentOS5? ever since the RPM for FF3 came out it has been crashing daily. Usually when I use Save As... or Browse... or anything else that brings up the Gnome file picker. After the crash I re-start then the file picker works for a while. Sometimes it just takes scrolling or click+drag an image or some other random action. BANG your'e dead. Very frustrating. Now today it is just crashing randomly, I am not even touching it. Maybe one of my plugins, I know. I guess I will run it with debugger/strace. but does anyone else see this? $ rpm -qa firefox firefox-3.0.2-3.el5.centos $ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.2 (Final) $ rpm -qa kdebase kdebase-3.5.4-18.el5.centos

10 13

OT: Setting a CentOS to gateway a private IP address
by James B. Byrne 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

This is mildly off topic since it has more to do with TCP/IP networking than with CentOS per se. However, at the risk of ruffling a few feathers I would like some advice on how to resolve the following routing problem: Given: dual homed host running CentOS-5.2 with eth0 = 2xx.yyy.zzz.23 eth1 = 192.168.219.1 and a Cisco gateway at 2xx.1xx.y7y.1 with the following networks: interface FastEthernet0/1 description connected to EthernetLAN ip address 10.0.0.1 255.0.0.0 secondary ip address 172.16.0.1 255.240.0.0 secondary ip address 192.168.71.1 255.255.255.0 secondary ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.0.0 secondary ip address 2xx.yyy.zzz.1 255.255.255.0 ip access-group 101 in ip inspect FastEthernet_0_1 in speed 100 full-duplex ! router rip version 2 passive-interface FastEthernet0/0 network 10.0.0.0 network 172.16.0.0 network 192.168.0.0 network 2xx.yyy.zzz.0 no auto-summary ! ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 FastEthernet0/0 and with the following routes on the CentOS host: # route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.219.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 2xx.yyy.zzz.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 default gw-fibrewire 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 # ip route 192.168.219.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.219.1 2xx.yyy.zzz.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 2xx.yyy.zzz.23 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth1 scope link default via 2xx.yyy.zzz.1 dev eth0 The situation is this. >From the host itself I can ping 192.168.218.102 on 192.168.219.0/24 >From any other host on 2xx.1xx.y7y.0/24 I can ping 192.168.219.1 >From any other host on 2xx.1xx.y7y.0/24 I cannot ping 192.168.219.102 What setup steps on the CentOS host have I overlooked or what configuration errors have I committed? As I am a digest subscriber please use "reply all" so that I get an immediate copy of any replies. Regards, -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

5 8

Certain scripts "hang" the terminal on logout
by Sean Carolan 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

I have an init script that after running, causes my terminal not to log out cleanly. Here's what i mean: # /etc/init.d/script restart << this runs fine, returns my shell prompt # exit << When I enter this command, my shell window just stays "stuck" and actually won't close down. Anyone know why this happens?

3 4

What keeps logging to my console?
by Dirk H. Schulz 24 Oct '08

24 Oct '08

Hi folks, I have lots of messages like these appearing on my local CentOS 5.2 consoles: > Oct 17 12:03:29 machine kernel: printk: 1 messages suppressed. > Oct 17 12:03:29 machine kernel: pbond0: received packet with own address as source address I have disabled console logging in syslog.conf, and even if I shut down syslog and kernel logger, the messages keep coming on the local consoles (not on remote consoles). So the question is: What process logs directly to the console bypassing syslog/kernel log facilities? How can I find where to stop that? Thanks for any hint or help. Dirk

5 11

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
30
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss October 2008