Discuss November 2009

discuss@lists.centos.org

311 participants
291 discussions

Amavisd and ClamAV
by Tony Molloy 27 Nov '09

27 Nov '09

Hi, I want to move my mail server from sendmail to postfix over christmas. I've got a test server running with the following: postfix dovecot postgrey amavisd-new clamav spamassassin I've followed the howto's on the wiki <http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos> with the exception that I installed amavisd-new and clamav from the EPEL repo rather than rpmforge. Things work OK with the exception of clamav. When I start clamav I get the following error. [root@newgoext ~]# service clamd.amavisd start Starting clamd.amavisd: ERROR: Missing argument for option at line 2 ERROR: Can't open/parse the config file /etc/clamd.d/amavisd.conf [FAILED] As this is a test server I'v set selinux to permissive so it doesn't look like a selinux problem. Thanks, Tony -- Dept. of Comp. Sci. University of Limerick.

2 2

my mail is refusing messages
by Nelson Gonzaga 27 Nov '09

27 Nov '09

Hi there, I trying to send e-mail using this: mail -s "maillog" ngonzaga(a)yahoo.com < /var/log/maillog but sendmail refused and I don't know why, see my maillog: Nov 19 14:31:33 servertdoc sendmail[11258]: nAJGVXXi011258: from=root, size=353085, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200911191631.nAJGVXXi011258(a)servertdoc.toshiba.fmg>, relay=root@localhost Nov 19 14:31:33 servertdoc sendmail[11258]: nAJGVXXi011258: to=ngonzaga(a)yahoo.com, ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=383085, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] There is some wrong setup, what can be? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com

3 3

OT: Using route metrics under dhcpd.conf
by carlopmart 27 Nov '09

27 Nov '09

Hi all, Somebody knows how can I assign metric to a static router under dhcpd.conf? Many thanks... -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Docx format ?
by mark 27 Nov '09

27 Nov '09

Sorin Srbu wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On > Behalf >> Of m.roth(a)5-cent.us >> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 7:22 PM >> Niki Kovacs wrote: >>> Roger asked: >>>> Is there any way I can read a .docx file on my CentOS desktop ? >>>> >>> Open Office 3 will do it. >> Yep, as well as .xlsx > > What about Powerpoint presentations, ie .pptx-files? Do they look anywhere > near the original look when opened in MS Office? > No clue - haven't run into one of those yet. > I'm looking into setting up a public computer in our seminar room, running > CentOS on an old door-stopper I had handy; a P3/500 with barely 500MB RAM. > Barely, he says. "Barely".... mark, remembering the hot new ->30MB<- h/d his bosses gave him in '89 as a holiday present > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- "Think of the elves as being like the CIA: whether or not they're on your side, you don't really want to be noticed by them" - Sean Mead (?), Windycon, 2002

2 1

Docx format ?
by Niki Kovacs 27 Nov '09

27 Nov '09

Hi, Is there any way I can read a .docx file on my CentOS desktop ? Cheers, Niki

12 15

META: Somebody please unsubscribe this chap until he fixes his problem
by Christopher Chan 27 Nov '09

27 Nov '09

armando(a)mail.bpa.cu The original message was received at Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:39:46 -0500 from faraon.cgr.bpa.cu [172.16.24.98] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu> (reason: 554 5.4.6 Too many hops) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 554 5.4.6 Too many hops 27 (25 max): from <christopher.chan(a)bradbury.edu.hk> via localhost, to <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Reporting-MTA: dns; simbad.bpa.cu Arrival-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:39:46 -0500 Final-Recipient: RFC822; armando(a)mail.bpa.cu Action: failed Status: 5.4.6 Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 5.4.6 Too many hops Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:41:47 -0500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return-Path: <christopher.chan(a)bradbury.edu.hk> Received: from bpa.cu (faraon.cgr.bpa.cu [172.16.24.98]) by simbad.bpa.cu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id nAQDdW8U006127 for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:39:46 -0500 Received: from simbad.bpa.cu ([172.16.24.150]) by bpa.cu (bpa.cu) (MDaemon PRO v9.6.6) with ESMTP id md50002534233.msg for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:11:46 -0500 X-Spam-Processed: bpa.cu, Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:11:46 -0500 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source) X-Rcpt-To: armando(a)mail.bpa.cu X-MDRcpt-To: armando(a)mail.bpa.cu X-MDRemoteIP: 172.16.24.150 X-Return-Path: christopher.chan(a)bradbury.edu.hk X-Envelope-From: christopher.chan(a)bradbury.edu.hk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: armando(a)mail.bpa.cu Received: from bpa.cu (faraon.cgr.bpa.cu [172.16.24.98]) by simbad.bpa.cu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id nAO4Bf8U029072 for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:11:42 -0500 Received: from simbad.bpa.cu ([172.16.24.150]) by bpa.cu (bpa.cu) (MDaemon PRO v9.6.6) with ESMTP id md50002534227.msg for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:06:45 -0500 Received: from bpa.cu (faraon.cgr.bpa.cu [172.16.24.98]) by simbad.bpa.cu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id nAO46h8U029043 for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:06:43 -0500 Received: from simbad.bpa.cu ([172.16.24.150]) by bpa.cu (bpa.cu) (MDaemon PRO v9.6.6) with ESMTP id md50002534220.msg for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:01:40 -0500 Received: from bpa.cu (faraon.cgr.bpa.cu [172.16.24.98]) by simbad.bpa.cu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id nAO41d8U029021 for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:01:39 -0500 Received: from simbad.bpa.cu ([172.16.24.150]) by bpa.cu (bpa.cu) (MDaemon PRO v9.6.6) with ESMTP id md50002534213.msg for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:56:40 -0500 Received: from bpa.cu (faraon.cgr.bpa.cu [172.16.24.98]) by simbad.bpa.cu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id nAO3uc8U028988 for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:56:38 -0500 Received: from simbad.bpa.cu ([172.16.24.150]) by bpa.cu (bpa.cu) (MDaemon PRO v9.6.6) with ESMTP id md50002534210.msg for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:51:50 -0500 Received: from bpa.cu (faraon.cgr.bpa.cu [172.16.24.98]) by simbad.bpa.cu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id nAO3ph8U028960 for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:51:48 -0500 Received: from simbad.bpa.cu ([172.16.24.150]) by bpa.cu (bpa.cu) (MDaemon PRO v9.6.6) with ESMTP id md50002534205.msg for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:47:00 -0500 Received: from bpa.cu (faraon.cgr.bpa.cu [172.16.24.98]) by simbad.bpa.cu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id nAO3kk8U028931 for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:46:59 -0500 Received: from simbad.bpa.cu ([172.16.24.150]) by bpa.cu (bpa.cu) (MDaemon PRO v9.6.6) with ESMTP id md50002534194.msg for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:41:55 -0500 Received: from bpa.cu (faraon.cgr.bpa.cu [172.16.24.98]) by simbad.bpa.cu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id nAO3fk8U028907 for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:41:51 -0500 Received: from simbad.bpa.cu ([172.16.24.150]) by bpa.cu (bpa.cu) (MDaemon PRO v9.6.6) with ESMTP id md50002534188.msg for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:36:55 -0500 Received: from bpa.cu (faraon.cgr.bpa.cu [172.16.24.98]) by simbad.bpa.cu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id nAO3ak8U028880 for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:36:51 -0500 Received: from simbad.bpa.cu ([172.16.24.150]) by bpa.cu (bpa.cu) (MDaemon PRO v9.6.6) with ESMTP id md50002534181.msg for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:32:05 -0500 Received: from bpa.cu (faraon.cgr.bpa.cu [172.16.24.98]) by simbad.bpa.cu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id nAO3Vk8U028853 for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:32:02 -0500 Received: from simbad.bpa.cu ([172.16.24.150]) by bpa.cu (bpa.cu) (MDaemon PRO v9.6.6) with ESMTP id md50002534174.msg for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:30:25 -0500 Received: from mail2.ceniai.inf.cu (mail2.ceniai.inf.cu [169.158.128.50]) by simbad.bpa.cu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id nAO3UL8U028843 for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:30:21 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ceniai.inf.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D81D2C90AC for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:30:24 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail2.ceniai.inf.cu Received: from mail2.ceniai.inf.cu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ceniai.inf.cu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8FT50aFb1BMO for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:30:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.centos.org (mail.centos.org [72.26.200.202]) by mail2.ceniai.inf.cu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEC12C90A7 for <armando(a)mail.bpa.cu>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:30:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.centos.org (voxeldev.centos.org [127.0.0.1]) by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D216F774; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:29:24 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: centos(a)centos.org Delivered-To: centos(a)centos.org Received: from mail.bradbury.edu.hk (ipvpn098242.netvigator.com [203.198.207.242]) by mail.centos.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F3A6F774 for <centos(a)centos.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:29:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.9.5] (ipvpn098241.netvigator.com [203.198.207.241]) by mail.bradbury.edu.hk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B12514795C for <centos(a)centos.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:29:18 +0800 (HKT)

1 0

SAMBA vs NFS
by Alan McKay 26 Nov '09

26 Nov '09

Hey folks, A coworker wants to share drives between CentOS systems via SAMBA, which sort of seems pretty counter intuitive to me. But he says he's had troubles in the past with NFS. He was sort of short on details, but something about NFS not being reliable unless you enable NFS locking, but when you do that, you can end up in situations where if the server crashes it can cause the clients to hang too. I've used NFS for years in other jobs and don't recall issues like this. Thoughts? thanks, -Alan -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"

6 7

GGI or Server Based Proxy Recommendations
by James Bensley 26 Nov '09

26 Nov '09

Hey List, Can anyone recommend any software like that at http://proxify.co.uk/ for me to install on a server for use as a http proxy? TIA, -- Regards, James ;)

4 5

rndc start fails with "rndc: connect failed: connection refused"
by Hugh E Cruickshank 26 Nov '09

26 Nov '09

CentOS 4.8, BIND 9.2.4 Hi All: I have a rather annoying problem with rndc which I have not been able to resolve despite much searching and many attempts to correct. When making changes to our DNS entries I have tried to use the following procedures: 1. Flush the cache buffers: rndc flush 2. Stop named: rndc stop 3. Delete the journal files: rm *.jnl 4. Edit the forward and/or reverse zone files as necessary. 5. Restart named: rndc start Everything works fine until the last command which fails with: rndc: connect failed: connection refused I can get around this by using "service named start" but I should not have to do this. Has anyone encountered something similar and can pass on some words of wisdom? TIA Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com

8 16

Yum and upgrading PHP
by ML 26 Nov '09

26 Nov '09

Hi All, I ran yum upgrade today and it went fine. I tried a yum upgrade php so that I could get to either 5.2 or 5.3 (currently 5.1.2) and It says nothing marked for upgrade. How does one upgrade individual packages versus doing a plain system upgrade (like just yum upgrade) -Jason

5 6

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
30
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss November 2009