Discuss November 2009

discuss@lists.centos.org

311 participants
291 discussions

hard drive errors
by lostson 24 Nov '09

24 Nov '09

Hello I seem to be getting some messages via email and in var/log/messages as well, i think its a hard drive gone bad but was wondering if anyone has seen something similar to this or would have some ideas if its fixable or not, here are the messages This email was generated by the smartd daemon running on: host name: localhost.localdomain DNS domain: localdomain NIS domain: (none) The following warning/error was logged by the smartd daemon: Device: /dev/hda, 993 Currently unreadable (pending) sectors For details see host's SYSLOG (default: /var/log/messages). Nov 23 18:20:22 localhost kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Nov 23 18:20:22 localhost kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC } Nov 23 18:20:22 localhost kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown Nov 23 18:20:22 localhost kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Nov 23 18:20:22 localhost kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC } Nov 23 18:20:22 localhost kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown Nov 23 18:20:22 localhost kernel: hda: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error } Nov 23 18:20:22 localhost kernel: hda: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStatusError BadCRC } Nov 23 18:20:22 localhost kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown thanks for any ideas. LostSon

6 5

A problem about upgrade centos5.2
by 王行焘 24 Nov '09

24 Nov '09

hi, i made a mistake that i used centos5.4 i686 to upgrade the centos 5.2 x86_64,which runs on a server whose cpu is Xeon.The server seems to need CentOS X86_64 version. Should i use the　CentOS 5.4 X86_64 disk to upgrade the CentOS 5.4 i 686? Ps.I urgently need to upgrade it because the glibc x86_64 conflicts with the i686 one....It drives me crazy and i am hitting my head against the wall... Should that work well?Should i try that？Please help to let me move on with my life.... Thanks very much! -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Best wishes from WANG Xing-tao Management Information and Information System BeijingJiaotongUniversity 北京交通大学经济管理学院信息管理与信息系统王行焘

2 1

Network CentOS 2.1
by Wahyu Darmawan 24 Nov '09

24 Nov '09

Hi All, I have 2 LAN interfaces, and just added a new one, but it wouldn't configure. when I finished configure and I run command ifup eth2 appeared error message : netmask: Host name lookup failure Need your help soon. Thanks,

3 4

CERN using RHEL/CentOS?
by Timo Schoeler 24 Nov '09

24 Nov '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I just did my daily news scan and saw some screenshots that illustrate the press release [0] announcing the first collisions at the LHC. Those screenshots show windows and buttons that exactly match my CentOS GNOME Desktop [1]. AFAIK, SuSE/Novell has different skins, as has (Open)Solaris and AIX, for instance. So, has there anybody more information on this? Would make a nice success story for CentOS! Best, Timo [0] -- http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2009/PR17.09E.html [1] -- http://press.web.cern.ch/press/PressReleases/Releases2009/Images/CMS.png -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFLC5LGfg746kcGBOwRAnxPAKC9RsEss5nBdQ2bAebS2W1RGn4RawCdHeeK mz1KpBFba045eoz9dHjjlPQ= =ivpn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

5 8

APIC error on CPU0: 00(60)
by Andrey Garkin 24 Nov '09

24 Nov '09

Hi All! I have a some problem: On the my motherboard Intel DG45NB with Processor Box Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 , i see in the dmesg(log file): dmesg | grep CPU0 APIC error on CPU0: 00(60) or the sometime: dmesg | grep CPU1 APIC error on CPU1: 00(60) How can I fix this problem??? This Bug is my motherboard or the kernel??? The system good working is uptime... Without reboot... Other error in the log file - not found. My kernel 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 My system CentOS 5.4...

3 3

NFS4 issue
by Philip Manuel 23 Nov '09

23 Nov '09

We are running kernel 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 with exporting 3 aoe provided ext4 directories. For a couple of weeks we had a small number of users using the system with no issues, today we added 7 users and the system crashed and did not perform correctly since. Nov 23 10:20:03 sulphur rpc.idmapd[5199]: nfsdcb: id '-2' too big! Nov 23 10:42:25 sulphur nfsd[27306]: nfssvc: Setting version failed: errno 16 (Device or resource busy) Nov 23 10:42:25 sulphur nfsd[27306]: nfssvc: unable to bind UPD socket: errno 98 (Address already in use) Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `nfsd4_files': Can't free all objects Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88645efd>] :nfsd:nfsd4_free_slab+0x11/0x4d Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88645f55>] :nfsd:nfsd4_free_slabs+0x1c/0x33 Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88646ecb>] :nfsd:nfs4_state_shutdown+0x17e/0x18a Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88630570>] :nfsd:nfsd_last_thread+0x45/0x76 Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88630856>] :nfsd:nfsd+0x2b5/0x2cb Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff886305a1>] :nfsd:nfsd+0x0/0x2cb Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff886305a1>] :nfsd:nfsd+0x0/0x2cb Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: BUG: warning at fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:1016/nfsd4_free_slab() (Tainted: G ) Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88645f55>] :nfsd:nfsd4_free_slabs+0x1c/0x33 Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88646ecb>] :nfsd:nfs4_state_shutdown+0x17e/0x18a Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88630570>] :nfsd:nfsd_last_thread+0x45/0x76 Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88630856>] :nfsd:nfsd+0x2b5/0x2cb Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff886305a1>] :nfsd:nfsd+0x0/0x2cb Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff886305a1>] :nfsd:nfsd+0x0/0x2cb Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: slab error in kmem_cache_destroy(): cache `nfsd4_delegations': Can't free all objects Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88645efd>] :nfsd:nfsd4_free_slab+0x11/0x4d Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88646ecb>] :nfsd:nfs4_state_shutdown+0x17e/0x18a Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88630570>] :nfsd:nfsd_last_thread+0x45/0x76 Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88630856>] :nfsd:nfsd+0x2b5/0x2cb Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff886305a1>] :nfsd:nfsd+0x0/0x2cb Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff886305a1>] :nfsd:nfsd+0x0/0x2cb Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: BUG: warning at fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:1016/nfsd4_free_slab() (Tainted: G ) Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88646ecb>] :nfsd:nfs4_state_shutdown+0x17e/0x18a Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88630570>] :nfsd:nfsd_last_thread+0x45/0x76 Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88630856>] :nfsd:nfsd+0x2b5/0x2cb Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff886305a1>] :nfsd:nfsd+0x0/0x2cb Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff886305a1>] :nfsd:nfsd+0x0/0x2cb Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: nfsd: last server has exited Nov 23 10:42:26 sulphur kernel: nfsd: unexporting all filesystems Nov 23 10:42:44 sulphur kernel: kmem_cache_create: duplicate cache nfsd4_files Nov 23 10:42:44 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88646f29>] :nfsd:nfs4_state_start+0x52/0x18f Nov 23 10:42:44 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff886303ae>] :nfsd:nfsd_svc+0x6c/0x1e9 Nov 23 10:42:44 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88630f8e>] :nfsd:write_threads+0x0/0xa9 Nov 23 10:42:44 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88630ffd>] :nfsd:write_threads+0x6f/0xa9 Nov 23 10:42:44 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88630f8e>] :nfsd:write_threads+0x0/0xa9 Nov 23 10:42:44 sulphur kernel: [<ffffffff88630d59>] :nfsd:nfsctl_transaction_write+0x42/0x77Nov 23 10:42:44 sulphur nfsd[27369]: nfssvc: Cannot allocate memory Nov 23 10:43:55 sulphur nfsd[27495]: nfssvc: Setting version failed: errno 16 (Device or resource busy) Nov 23 10:43:55 sulphur nfsd[27495]: nfssvc: unable to bind UPD socket: errno 98 (Address already in use) So above shows the original problem and then me restarting it and eventually I had to reboot the server. Since then it has been behaving bizarrely with it running for 5 mins and then stopping, upon a restart it will run for a while and then stop. Nov 23 11:04:46 sulphur kernel: NFSD: Using /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery as the NFSv4 state recovery directory Nov 23 11:17:02 sulphur rpc.idmapd[8178]: nfsdcb: id '-2' too big! Nov 23 11:29:01 sulphur kernel: nfsd: last server has exited Nov 23 11:29:01 sulphur kernel: nfsd: unexporting all filesystems Nov 23 11:29:08 sulphur kernel: NFSD: Using /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery as the NFSv4 state recovery directory Nov 23 11:29:08 sulphur rpc.idmapd[8178]: nfsdcb: id '-2' too big! Nov 23 11:32:03 sulphur kernel: nfsd: last server has exited Nov 23 11:32:03 sulphur kernel: nfsd: unexporting all filesystems Nov 23 11:32:34 sulphur kernel: NFSD: Using /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery as the NFSv4 state recovery directory Nov 23 11:32:34 sulphur rpc.idmapd[8178]: nfsdcb: id '-2' too big! Nov 23 11:41:58 sulphur kernel: nfsd: last server has exited Nov 23 11:41:58 sulphur kernel: nfsd: unexporting all filesystems Nov 23 11:42:03 sulphur kernel: NFSD: Using /var/lib/nfs/v4recovery as the NFSv4 state recovery directory Nov 23 11:42:03 sulphur rpc.idmapd[8178]: nfsdcb: id '-2' too big! Nov 23 11:47:20 sulphur kernel: nfsd: last server has exited Nov 23 11:47:20 sulphur kernel: nfsd: unexporting all filesystems I haven't found a report of an issues for the "nfsdcb: id '-2' too big!" message but equally I don't know what it means either. On the console we are seeing loads of these messages:- kernel: NFSD: preprocess_seqid_op: magic stateid! Again I don't know what this means or the implications of this message. Any suggestions would be welcome. At the moment we are up with two users migrated back to the old servers. Thanks Phil.

2 3

Re: [CentOS] Via EPIA m10000 Nemehiah
by Tim Nelson 23 Nov '09

23 Nov '09

----- "Karanbir Singh" <mail-lists(a)karan.org> wrote: > On 23/11/09 17:50, Ben Mohilef wrote: > > This looked and felt like an acpi induced problem. I discovered that > acpid was turned on for some > > reason, so I turned off the acpid daemon and it has behaved well for > the last day. Are you booting > > yours with acpi=off as well ?? > > nope, just the straight kernel and initrd. nothing special in there. > > this is actually quite a boring standard install with almost nothing > changed on there from what is left behind by a minimal 5.1 install ( > and > its been updated nightly since then ) > > - KB Is it possible you have an application that runs at odd times that is compiled for the wrong arch? IIRC the C3 is i586 compatible (almost i686 but missing something stupid like 'cmov' instruction). I've got a handful of C3 based systems in my personal lab and run into 'oddities' every now and then because of this... Tim Nelson Systems/Network Support Rockbochs Inc. (218)727-4332 x105

2 2

Via EPIA m10000 Nemehiah
by Ben Mohilef 23 Nov '09

23 Nov '09

Does anyone else have one of these on 24/7 running RHEL 5.4 or Centos 5.4 ?? That box mysteriously stops ( no crash data, it just stops) hours or days after boot, with or without X. Cntl-Alt-Delete reboots it without power cycling. The usual diagnostics (memtest and fsck) return no errors. Works great until it freezes. No evidence of kernel oops anywhere. If others report the same issues we will scrap the board. Otherwise I will continue to investigate what is happening, since it is no fun to pull the board out and replace with an atom processor and it is not critical. The hard disk in it came from an Athlon M board that died an untimely death this week. Service cpufreq reports "unavailable" so I am assuming that it is turned off. Could the cpu freqquency control be doing something without tellling us? We havea power monitor on it so I can discern if it dies with max cpu activity or not. Also I am leaving it run "top" without screensaver so I can see if a particular load or program is borking it. Am I missing something obvious here? TIA. benm

2 3

3Com 3c940 moel only giving me 100 mb throughput to network switch
by Gilbert Sebenste 23 Nov '09

23 Nov '09

Hello all, As the subject states, I have a 3Com 3c940 Ethernet card to a 1 gb network switch. The switch detects it, but it only shows that it is giving me 100 mb/sec throughput. That card is rated for 1 GB...is there a way to force it to try to use 1 GB/sec? System-config-network isn't helping me here. Thanks for any help! ******************************************************************************* Gilbert Sebenste ******** (My opinions only!) ****** *******************************************************************************

4 10

Microsoft .mdb files in Open office
by linux-crazy 23 Nov '09

23 Nov '09

Hi, Is there is anyway to Open Microsoft .mdb files in open office on Centos 5.3 ? Thanks linux

3 2

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
30
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss November 2009