Discuss August 2009

discuss@lists.centos.org

282 participants
264 discussions

firewall question
by Jerry Geis 07 Aug '09

07 Aug '09

My firewall config is below... I am trying to figure out why another machine has access to port 5038 on my machine based on these firewall rules. I thought the reject at the bottom would take care of all other ports? It does not. I have restarted with "server iptables restart" and same thing. I can connect from another machine to my machine on port 5038. How do I prevent this? Jerry --------------------------------- This is my firewall: # Firewall configuration written by system-config-securitylevel # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0] -A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth0 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -i eth1 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p icmp --icmp-type any -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p 50 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p 51 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp --dport 5353 -d 224.0.0.251 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 631 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 631 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 2049 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 2049 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 69 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 69 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6540 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6500 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6510 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6520 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5060 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5036 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 4569 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 1720 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 4520 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 123 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 5900 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5900 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 2000 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 2000 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 5353 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 5353 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 6544 -j ACCEPT -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT

7 8

so many arp caches why?
by MontyRee 07 Aug '09

07 Aug '09

Hello, all. When I execute arp -a -n, there are lots of arp caches like below. Surely, I set netmask and Broadcast without problem and routing table also no problem. System is CentOS release 4.7 i386. I know how to delete the arp cache, but I don't know why .. # ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:D1:E7:91:CC inet addr:192.168.195.36 Bcast:192.168.195.63 Mask:255.255.255.192 # route -n 192.168.195.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.192 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 192.168.195.36 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 # arp -a -n ? (120.88.46.10) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (208.80.195.54) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (125.122.171.33) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.233.26.29) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (111.125.201.75) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (218.24.196.100) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (60.190.216.31) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (72.232.223.58) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.39.135.185) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (203.171.229.153) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (121.11.81.217) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (61.110.195.18) at 00:11:43:E0:7D:19 [ether] on eth0 ? (61.164.112.5) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (218.66.79.152) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (221.139.48.11) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.233.26.12) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.137.175.2) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (116.71.174.203) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (72.18.205.157) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.39.136.4) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (202.255.47.226) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (211.211.52.134) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (218.61.2.197) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ? (61.164.151.12) at 00:23:5E:12:63:FE [ether] on eth0 ............. _________________________________________________________________ 메신저 10살 생일도 축하해 주시고,이벤트도 참여하세요~! http://im.msn.co.kr/im/main/mainCoverDetail.asp?BbsCode=bbs01&Seq=2688

5 9

syslog to remote server
by hce 07 Aug '09

07 Aug '09

Hi, I set up the syslog.conf to log local0 and local1 to a remote log server: *.info;mail.none;authpriv.none;cron.none;local0.none;local1.none /var/log/messages local0.*;local1.* @192.168.1.2 The messages from local0 worked fine, all sent to the remote log server. But all messages from local1 were still displayed in /var/log/messages despite it has been set to local1.none. Of cause, no local1 messages were sending to the remote server. Could I be missing something here, or could be a bug in 2.6.18-53.el5 which I am running? Thank you. Kind Regards, Jupiter

3 2

Certificate system
by J.Witvliet＠MINDEF.NL 07 Aug '09

07 Aug '09

Hi all, Can anybody inform me wether the "RedHat Certificate System" or actually a CentOS equivalent is available for CentOS. Just skimmed on a download site through the RPM's for 5.3 and I couldn't find it. According to their pressrelease, it the code should be gpl, allthough I can't find any rpm for RH, FC or Centos. It seems that this is one of the few CA-packages for large scale deployment of certificates. Only alternative AFAIK is OpenCA, which seems to be hardly maintained... ( binaries on their site are old, and source code yields lots of errors during build..) Defensie/CDC/IVENT/Research en Innovation Centrum Ing J. (Hans) Witvliet Systeembeheer, CAcert-assurer T 0174-539053 mailto:j.witvliet@mindef.nl Coldenhovelaan 1, 3155RC Maasland, kamer A109 ______________________________________________________________________ Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten. This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.

6 6

BIND vulnerability
by Kenneth Porter 06 Aug '09

06 Aug '09

Slashdot carried this story yesterday on a BIND vulnerability: <http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/07/29/0028231/New-DoS-Vulnerability-In-All-…> The upstream report: <https://www.isc.org/node/474> Red Hat's Bugzilla: <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514292> >From what I'm reading, if one has an Internet-facing master for a zone, one is vulnerable, even if dynamic DNS isn't being used.

15 26

traceenable for httpd
by Jerry Geis 06 Aug '09

06 Aug '09

On centos 5.3 x86_64 I can add "traceenable off" to httpd.conf and that works well. however this doesnt seem to work for centos 4.7 i686. Is there a similiar named option on 4.7? Jerry

5 4

Battery condition tools CentOS/Dell
by Kwan Lowe 06 Aug '09

06 Aug '09

Hello all: Does anyone know of a tool/project that will allow me to read the battery condition (not the charge status) on a Dell laptop battery? Under XP there is a utility that warns that the battery is still holding a charge but that the battery is degraded and should be replaced. Also, not sure if this is possible, but I would like to control how the laptop charges the battery. I tend to have the laptop plugged in most of the time and this constant charging state is apparently very bad for battery lifetime. So a charge/drain cycle is supposedly better. Thanks, Kwan

12 20

Autorun ability on cd?
by James B. Byrne 06 Aug '09

06 Aug '09

On: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:15:47 -0400, Stephen Harris <lists(a)spuddy.org> wrote: > > Untested, and it depends very much on your shell, but create a > function > > cdr() > { > cd $1 || exit > if [ -x ./.myscript ] > then > ./.myscript > fi > } > > Now if you use "cdr" (for Change Directory & Run) it should do what > you want (runs a file called ".myscript" in the new directory if > it exists) > > > This _might_ work... > > cd() > { > command cd $1 || exit > if [ -x ./.myscript ] > then > ./.myscript > fi > } > > OK, I just tested the later under ksh88 and it worked. You'd need > to > test with bash/ksh93/whatever-your-shell-is > > $ cat x1/.myscript > echo hello > $ cd x1 > hello > $ mkdir x0 > $ cd x0 > $ cd .. > hello > $ > > As you can see, everytime I enter the "x1" directory it runs > .myscript > > -- > > rgds > Stephen >****************** > Thank You. I usually run in the CentOS default (bash) shell. I will give this a try and report back. Many thanks, -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

1 1

rpmforge.repo
by Sam Drinkard 06 Aug '09

06 Aug '09

Sorry I didn't quote the reply from Christoph Maser... was on another machine. Anyhow, this is the complete yum output with rpmforge.repo active. # yum update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, protectbase Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * rpmforge: ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de * base: centos.corenetworks.net * updates: mirror.anl.gov * addons: mirror.skiplink.com * extras: centos.corenetworks.net Excluding Packages in global exclude list Finished 145 packages excluded due to repository priority protections 0 packages excluded due to repository protections Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package spamassassin.x86_64 0:3.2.5-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package libwpd.x86_64 0:0.8.14-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-XML-Parser.x86_64 0:2.36-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.18-128.4.1.el5 set to be installed ---> Package perl-IO-Zlib.noarch 0:1.10-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package nmap.x86_64 2:5.00-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package kernel-headers.x86_64 0:2.6.18-128.4.1.el5 set to be updated ---> Package perl-Archive-Tar.noarch 0:1.40-1.el5.rf set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: perl(Package::Constants) for package: perl-Archive-Tar ---> Package perl-Net-SSLeay.x86_64 0:1.35-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package subversion.x86_64 0:1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package dstat.noarch 0:0.6.9-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-XML-NamespaceSupport.noarch 0:1.10-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-IO-Socket-INET6.noarch 0:2.56-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package nmap-frontend.x86_64 2:5.00-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package iso-codes.noarch 0:1.0a-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-Net-DNS.x86_64 0:0.65-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package bind.x86_64 30:9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.3 set to be updated ---> Package perl-HTML-Parser.x86_64 0:3.61-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-DBD-mysql.x86_64 0:4.012-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-Socket6.x86_64 0:0.23-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package udftools.x86_64 0:1.0.0b3-3.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package bind-utils.x86_64 30:9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.3 set to be updated ---> Package dnsmasq.x86_64 0:2.49-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-XML-SAX.noarch 0:0.96-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package syslinux.x86_64 0:3.82-1.el5.rf set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5) for package: syslinux ---> Package perl-IO-Socket-SSL.noarch 0:1.26-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package bind-chroot.x86_64 30:9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.3 set to be updated ---> Package clamav-db.x86_64 0:0.95.2-4.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-Digest-SHA1.x86_64 0:2.12-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-Convert-ASN1.noarch 0:0.22-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package lftp.x86_64 0:3.7.14-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package bind-libs.x86_64 30:9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.3 set to be updated ---> Package perl-DBI.x86_64 0:1.609-1.el5.rf set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: perl(RPC::PlClient) >= 0.2000 for package: perl-DBI --> Processing Dependency: perl(RPC::PlServer) >= 0.2001 for package: perl-DBI ---> Package perl-IO-Compress.noarch 0:2.020-2.el5.rf set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: perl(Compress::Raw::Bzip2) >= 2.020 for package: perl-IO-Compress --> Processing Dependency: perl(Compress::Raw::Zlib) >= 2.020 for package: perl-IO-Compress ---> Package perl-HTML-Tagset.noarch 0:3.20-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package mtr.x86_64 2:0.75-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-BSD-Resource.x86_64 0:1.2901-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package rsync.x86_64 0:3.0.6-1.el5.rf set to be updated --> Running transaction check ---> Package perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.x86_64 0:2.020-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-Package-Constants.noarch 0:0.02-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5.noarch 0:1.3-1.2.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2.x86_64 0:2.020-1.el5.rf set to be updated ---> Package perl-PlRPC.noarch 0:0.2020-1.el5.rf set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: perl(Net::Daemon) for package: perl-PlRPC --> Processing Dependency: perl(Net::Daemon::Log) for package: perl-PlRPC --> Processing Dependency: perl(Net::Daemon::Test) for package: perl-PlRPC --> Running transaction check ---> Package perl-Net-Daemon.noarch 0:0.43-1.el5.rf set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution --> Running transaction check ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.18-128.1.14.el5 set to be erased --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: kernel x86_64 2.6.18-128.4.1.el5 updates 17 M perl-IO-Compress noarch 2.020-2.el5.rf rpmforge 237 k replacing perl-Compress-Zlib.x86_64 1.42-1.fc6 Updating: bind x86_64 30:9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.3 updates 961 k bind-chroot x86_64 30:9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.3 updates 42 k bind-libs x86_64 30:9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.3 updates 869 k bind-utils x86_64 30:9.3.4-10.P1.el5_3.3 updates 173 k clamav-db x86_64 0.95.2-4.el5.rf rpmforge 21 M dnsmasq x86_64 2.49-1.el5.rf rpmforge 225 k dstat noarch 0.6.9-1.el5.rf rpmforge 192 k iso-codes noarch 1.0a-1.el5.rf rpmforge 1.5 M kernel-headers x86_64 2.6.18-128.4.1.el5 updates 958 k lftp x86_64 3.7.14-1.el5.rf rpmforge 2.1 M libwpd x86_64 0.8.14-1.el5.rf rpmforge 1.5 M mtr x86_64 2:0.75-1.el5.rf rpmforge 84 k nmap x86_64 2:5.00-1.el5.rf rpmforge 1.7 M nmap-frontend x86_64 2:5.00-1.el5.rf rpmforge 767 k perl-Archive-Tar noarch 1.40-1.el5.rf rpmforge 61 k perl-BSD-Resource x86_64 1.2901-1.el5.rf rpmforge 57 k perl-Convert-ASN1 noarch 0.22-1.el5.rf rpmforge 46 k perl-DBD-mysql x86_64 4.012-1.el5.rf rpmforge 228 k perl-DBI x86_64 1.609-1.el5.rf rpmforge 871 k perl-Digest-SHA1 x86_64 2.12-1.el5.rf rpmforge 75 k perl-HTML-Parser x86_64 3.61-1.el5.rf rpmforge 151 k perl-HTML-Tagset noarch 3.20-1.el5.rf rpmforge 14 k perl-IO-Socket-INET6 noarch 2.56-1.el5.rf rpmforge 17 k perl-IO-Socket-SSL noarch 1.26-1.el5.rf rpmforge 55 k perl-IO-Zlib noarch 1.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge 17 k perl-Net-DNS x86_64 0.65-1.el5.rf rpmforge 288 k perl-Net-SSLeay x86_64 1.35-1.el5.rf rpmforge 327 k perl-Socket6 x86_64 0.23-1.el5.rf rpmforge 50 k perl-XML-NamespaceSupport noarch 1.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge 16 k perl-XML-Parser x86_64 2.36-1.el5.rf rpmforge 318 k perl-XML-SAX noarch 0.96-1.el5.rf rpmforge 79 k rsync x86_64 3.0.6-1.el5.rf rpmforge 374 k spamassassin x86_64 3.2.5-1.el5.rf rpmforge 1.1 M subversion x86_64 1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf rpmforge 6.8 M syslinux x86_64 3.82-1.el5.rf rpmforge 1.2 M udftools x86_64 1.0.0b3-3.el5.rf rpmforge 100 k Removing: kernel x86_64 2.6.18-128.1.14.el5 installed 83 M Installing for dependencies: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2 x86_64 2.020-1.el5.rf rpmforge 111 k perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib x86_64 2.020-1.el5.rf rpmforge 178 k perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 noarch 1.3-1.2.el5.rf rpmforge 9.9 k perl-Net-Daemon noarch 0.43-1.el5.rf rpmforge 44 k perl-Package-Constants noarch 0.02-1.el5.rf rpmforge 7.8 k perl-PlRPC noarch 0.2020-1.el5.rf rpmforge 33 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 8 Package(s) Update 36 Package(s) Remove 1 Package(s) Total size: 61 M Total download size: 17 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/2): kernel-headers-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.x86_64.rpm | 958 kB 00:03 (2/2): kernel-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5.x86_64.rpm | 17 MB 00:16 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 847 kB/s | 17 MB 00:21 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/psvn.el from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/subversion.mo from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/subversion.mo from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/subversion.mo from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/subversion.mo from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/subversion.mo from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/subversion.mo from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES/subversion.mo from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/subversion.mo from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/subversion.mo from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/subversion.mo from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/subversion.mo from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/subversion.mo from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/svn.1.gz from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/svnadmin.1.gz from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/svnlook.1.gz from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/man/man5/svnserve.conf.5.gz from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/man/man8/svnserve.8.gz from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 file /usr/share/xemacs/site-packages/lisp/psvn.el from install of subversion-1.6.3-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5.i386 Error Summary ------------- Sam

3 2

Open Letter to Lance Davis
by R P Herrold 06 Aug '09

06 Aug '09

I seem to be having network and email issues tonight; please excuse any duplication -- Russ herrold -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 HTML dump on Thu Jul 30 00:30:33 EDT 2009 http://www.centos.org/ Open Letter to Lance Davis July 30, 2009 04:39 UTC This is an Open Letter to Lance Davis from fellow CentOS Developers It is regrettable that we are forced to send this letter but we are left with no other options. For some time now we have been attempting to resolve these problems: You seem to have crawled into a hole ... and this is not acceptable. You have long promised a statement of CentOS project funds; to this date this has not appeared. You hold sole control of the centos.org domain with no deputy; this is not proper. You have, it seems, sole 'Founders' rights in the IRC channels with no deputy ; this is not proper. When I (Russ) try to call the phone numbers for UK Linux, and for you individually, I get a telco intercept 'Lines are temporarily busy' for the last two weeks. Finally yesterday, a voicemail in your voice picked up, and I left a message urgently requesting a reply. Karanbir also reports calling and leaving messages without your reply. Please do not kill CentOS through your fear of shared management of the project. Clearly the project dies if all the developers walk away. Please contact me, or any other signer of this letter at once, to arrange for the required information to keep the project alive at the 'centos.org' domain. Sincerely, Russ Herrold Ralph Angenendt Karanbir Singh Jim Perrin Donavan Nelson Tim Verhoeven Tru Huynh Johnny Hughes - ---------------------------------- This document clearsigned with the key indicated and of record at the customary keyservers See: http://orcorc.blogspot.com/2008/08/gnupg-few-minutes-on-using-detached-and.… user: "R P Herrold <herrold(a)owlriver.com>" 1024-bit DSA key, ID 9B649644, created 2003-02-09 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFKcSQKMRh1QZtklkQRAqIFAJ96+UzMm7O0/JanMcYYqnX+UPJhMwCeOoL9 s83yIVHOmbcASgmb4hE8GRY= =2Yg2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

49 86

← Newer
1
...
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss August 2009