Discuss January 2010

discuss@lists.centos.org

296 participants
322 discussions

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Les Mikesell 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

Sorin Srbu wrote: > >>> I've never had any problems with software raid5 in linux before, but you >>> never >>> know... >> There's a big write performance hit from raid5 (software or not). It >> may not be enough to be a showstopper but I wouldn't recommend it. Can >> you reconfigure to a 0+1 or some other type that has better performance >> without losing too much space? The archive does have to be on a single >> filesystem, though, and if you use the epel RPM it makes things easier >> if you mount the volume at /var/lib/BackupPC before the install. >> See 'how to change archive directory' from: >> http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/backuppc/index.php?title=Tips_and_Tri… >> to do it after the install. > > I know, but in linux it's still a lot better than Windows, which I today > regret I ever introduced it in... Don't get me wrong, reliability is fine, but > the recheck on every restart is kinda' bothersome and takes like forever > > Today I have five 500GB-disks raided on linux machine. Remove one for parity > and I have 2TB of real space available. Doing a 0+1, ie 1TB, would indeed be > better as performance goes, but 1TB of space, well, it just isn't enough > unfortunately. If you have any opportunity to change things, I'd get some larger drives and use raid1 or 0+1. If you want offsite copies, a workable approach in the 2TB scale is to make a 3-member raid1 where you periodically swap the 3rd drive (in an internal or external swappable sata enclosure). If you don't need that, a 4 drive 0+1 raid of 1.5 TB drives would give you 3TB and better performance. What you have will work - but it will limit performance. > As it is now, the 2TB shebang is mounted as /backup. Does that count as a > single filesystem? Yes, but if you use the epel rpm, either mount it at /var/lib/BackupPC or put a symlink there before the install. If you install from the sourceforge source there is an install script that modifies the location so you can put things where you want, but the rpm packages have already done that. The next version will make this easier to change but the current one needs to stay in the location set when the package was built. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

2 2

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by nate 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

Sorin Srbu wrote: > Already done. Still feel a bit burned by the whole matter though. I still feel burned from IBM's 75GXP fiasco ~7 years ago, even joined the lawsuit at the time(and got booted by the judge because I was in another state), had probably an 80% failure rate on those disks. I got a PDF on a CD somewhere that has all kinds of internal IBM docs(from the lawsuit) showing how they knew what the problems were but refused to fix them. OT but reminded me of that.. nate

4 5

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Les Mikesell 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

On 1/14/2010 9:08 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> Go to the vendor's web site, enter their serial numbers and get an RMA for a >> free replacement. Every vendor has had bad batches. > > Already done. Still feel a bit burned by the whole matter though. Unfortunately, the only way commodity priced things get large scale real-world testing is after a large number of them have been sold. If the first one sold had to be perfect none of us could afford to buy it. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell(a)gmail.com

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Backup server
by Brian Mathis 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Sorin Srbu <sorin.srbu(a)orgfarm.uu.se> wrote: >>-----Original Message----- >>From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf >>Of Benjamin Franz >>Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 2:12 PM >>To: CentOS mailing list >>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server >> >>If you have any budget at all, invest in bigger drives. 7200 RPM 1 TB >>RAID rated drives can be bought for $160 each. Desktop rated 5900 RPM >>1.5 TB drives (which you can probably get away with in a dedicated >>backup server since you don't care a lot about speed and can tolerate >>long pauses for sector repair) can be bought for $110 each. Check Newegg. > > I haven't got a budget really. Today I asked for a new group-printer today and > the boss looked pained... 8-} > > I opted for the proven 500GB-sized disks and got more of those instead. I've > had a handful of 750GB-drives die on me recently. Somehow it feels the > technology isn't quite there yet for the bigger drive-sizes. Anybody remember > the IBM Deskstars in the early 00's...? > > Also, my experience is the more smaller disks you have, the faster they get. > Less to write to each I guess. > > >>Second, to maximize 'depth' of backups you should use a 'Tower of >>Hanoi'-like backup system. > > Good advice, thanks! > -- > /Sorin There seems to be a persistent conception among managers that anything "IT related" is a huge capital expenditure (as it used to be), and there's all sorts of resistance to buying anything new. However, you probably spend more on printer paper in 1 week than it costs to buy a 1TB drive. This kind of equipment is a disposable commodity, even though the accounting department still prefers to write it off over 7 years. However, IT also has a reputation of always wanting to buy new toys. Many times these toys are not needed, even though the IT person insists that they are. So you need to be able to walk the fine line between these two. To put it into perspective, ask the manager how much it would cost the business if this data was unrecoverable? After that, if they still don't want to spend a few hundred $$s on the insurance, get it in writing that your manager understands the risk and print it out and post it on your office wall.

5 6

Are SSD disks worth the cost for server usage?
by Mathieu Baudier 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

Hi, we want to upgrade our infrastructure and are considering renting two different types of server by a provider: - A: one is with 80 GB SSD (and 12 GB memory) http://www.ovh.co.uk/products/eg_ssd.xml - B: the other with 750 GB SATA2 (and 8 GB memory). http://www.ovh.co.uk/products/eg_best_of.xml The target infrastructure will host: - a few public web sites (PHP / MySQL) - a development infrastructure (subversion, bugzilla, automated builds) This will use KVM virtualization with Cent OS 5.4 hosts and guests. On the long run we will probably rent quite a few of type B depending on our needs of space and computing power. My question is whether it is worth using one of type A (with SSD drives) in order to host the critical data such as the web sites and the subversion repository (critical in the sense that these services should be fast, always available, and the related data as safe as possible). This critical server will be more read oriented than write. We will probably use a hardware RAID 1 with battery backed unit on it. My understanding is that SSD are much much faster. Is it really true in the real world? Are SSD drives also safer? (that is, less likely to crash under load) Or to the contrary? I have read/heard conflicting opinions so far and I'll be happy to hear opinions/experiences on SSD drives in a server settings from people on the list. More general comments about our plans are always welcome of course! Cheers, Mathieu PS: we will actually rent them in France, but I put links to the equivalent in Britain in order to have the description in English. For reference and for the French-speaking people, here are the actual servers we consider: http://www.ovh.com/fr/produits/eg_ssd.xml http://www.ovh.com/fr/produits/eg_best_of.xml (they are exactly the same)

7 10

[story] Thank goodness for links and caching DNS
by Michael A. Peters 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

Right in the middle of doing something important on my Ubuntu box, the web quit working. However, I could get to sites in my /etc/hosts file. Sure enough, all three of my ISPs nameservers were down. I'm not a DNS guy, but on my CentOS boxes I always installed a caching DNS out of the box since it was part of the obvious install options. So I set the DNS to one in my Ubuntu box, and of course the port was closed. So I ssh'd on in, opened 53 in the firewall, and the port was still closed. Tried running Firefox from the CentOS box via X forwarding over ssh but oddly, that seemed to lauch local Ubuntu firefox which didn't work. All of my CentOS boxes are headless, so all my boxes with working nameserver resolution thus only had text internet, which I haven't used in years. locate named.conf only showed some file in dbus that I knew wasn't right, but I was able to use links and find what I needed on google, the caching nameserver conf file has a slightly different filename than standard bind named.conf. I followed the warning, installed the system config utility for modifying it, but damn - for someone who doesn't know bind, that tool is scary looking, intimidating, I was afraid I was going to break my working caching nameserver if I messed around in it. So I backed up the file and hand edited it to add the IP to listen on, restarted bind, and am back in business. This is the second time in the last 6 months that all three of my ISP's nameservers have gone down, I wonder if they really are the same physical box, maybe even same network interface. What's the point of them having three if they all go down at same time? Ah well, I don't need them anymore for that. Thankfully the caching nameservers were already installed on my CentOS boxes, two of them now listens on their external interface, never again will I use my ISPs nameserver.

2 2

High load since passing from rhas3 to centos4.8
by fortin.pierre＠bell.ca 15 Jan '10

15 Jan '10

We are migrating HP servers from RHAS3 to centos 4.8. Since, the load average is reaching really high values. Under usage we see loads of 15-20 instead of the 0.5-1.5 we were used to. I searched a lot for information on such an issue. Iostat, vmstat, top, ps. But I don't get significant hint. Cpu usage remains low, IO wait remains low, no disks are lagging, no swap usage. Are there some tool / other way to diagnose why the load average is high? Like which processes are waiting, where they are stuck. Are there calls to drivers or system process that are slow? Thanks

5 7

NetworkManager won't save wireless keys
by Kevin Kempter 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

Hi all; I'm running KDE 3.5 on CentOS 5.4 I have wireless working however every time I boot I have to enter the wireless key. Anyone know how to get NetworkManager to save the keys? I've tried going to the 'edit connections' and adding the key there as well with no luck. Thanks in advance

3 3

Bonding modes
by Paras pradhan 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

I have a bonded interface running in mode 1 which is active/passive and no issue with this. I need to change it to mode 0 for active/active setup. Does mode 0 is dependent on the switches configuration? My setup is: 2 links from bonded interface is connected to different switches. When I change to mode0 from mode1 , bond0 is not coming up. These are the steps I performed 1) changed to options bond0 mode=0 miimon=100 from options bond0 mode=0 miimon=100 2) modprobe bonding 3) service network restart Thanks ! Paras.

6 18

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 59, Issue 5
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 14 Jan '10

14 Jan '10

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2010:0040 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 php Update (Karanbir Singh) 2. CESA-2010:0040 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 php Update (Karanbir Singh) 3. CESA-2010:0039 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 gcc Update (Karanbir Singh) 4. CESA-2010:0039 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 gcc Update (Karanbir Singh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:42:15 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0040 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 php Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20100113224215.GA27822(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0040 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0040.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 5cd17da5232b015fe531f139c163eaf1 php-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 431cea89c185369e22a45c05d5b14a18 php-bcmath-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm e28369af3d6bd3b6b51a94ceea490270 php-cli-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm bd716a0a02c4d686679d467771657464 php-common-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 66c38aff54c3d0f077ed2a08dec222e4 php-dba-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 81c7dc49634f12762e56e6bd6ed421d4 php-devel-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm ff3d4139ffc14d4350948e73521804f5 php-gd-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 00bf5859d2b767c81a99c282d8d0a6a8 php-imap-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm a7b2c45736400db2b2a73dfda9dd810a php-ldap-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 59d72f03dd3de3f42c6148be98234400 php-mbstring-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm bf156e5e9f8e88c478de0dec584139f2 php-mysql-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 3cd776b156375616756bec953913dfff php-ncurses-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 866948e4860941ac67204f76324fc6f2 php-odbc-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm bcca0b445d638308882d7a1c4051065c php-pdo-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 4a70f8a3276fc4b6638c99147e2ab924 php-pgsql-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 3c81787381fa13ebf758e503f2e6f1f6 php-snmp-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 4c17909723fd08320c95ad334e6dd7b9 php-soap-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 9792c5cbbe22b4dcb78f0ed898e3d72c php-xml-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm 278dffef21ff50aabd735292eb9ee819 php-xmlrpc-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.x86_64.rpm Source: 7ca20e4ffcb1ebf0eed39ba78ccf8f54 php-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:42:15 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0040 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 php Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20100113224215.GA27806(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0040 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0040.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: e59e61f43fa3855eceb0e8c8e84127b3 php-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 68a09d207e980fd377b20cc8352db157 php-bcmath-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 4174a6e1cf6a6af326c78070704f4fe5 php-cli-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm b343c0e3a85ce8882849f80d783022e4 php-common-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm a0cd41173bc5f9c6ceefb29bf68633c6 php-dba-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 3eab85411e3266c9943f71204ce8638d php-devel-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm ba100af79d25cb9530832e685b79f159 php-gd-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm b098c376512c7a30380c95022a3e9358 php-imap-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 631bc9b94a9bfa98e63e8aa459c0af8c php-ldap-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 78fa8812a08e88bf9dbbbdc09ed377b3 php-mbstring-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 88fb42de93dd26bed95dbab132bed232 php-mysql-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm f66cd74e508b4f80da6d9ce3099e5559 php-ncurses-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 4ebe1de9bcc9793075a6460881284ec5 php-odbc-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm abf6a5bb122cf61a4c6ae14a0861c638 php-pdo-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm c25b93c166e385f09f058a343d72bbd7 php-pgsql-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 065f6f16125c88f00e9d3dfb21bc79f6 php-snmp-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 198456949527d00976ab0c98da1a228a php-soap-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm 5a6f289140ae0c55337083dba1bd878c php-xml-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm cd3a2014610ec4b20f2648249ecb1a8e php-xmlrpc-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.i386.rpm Source: 7ca20e4ffcb1ebf0eed39ba78ccf8f54 php-5.1.6-24.el5_4.5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:58:41 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0039 Moderate CentOS 5 i386 gcc Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20100114125841.GA3276(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0039 Moderate Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0039.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 5a9045330d1c6d9d4e282cafa71c9bbf cpp-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 1d120e1f6704c46a5d290f0f3475ecea gcc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 78f3de0f9675c5e339f223a2b05706ee gcc-c++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm b3c24d32ac817d57de77436616d75f3e gcc-gfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm b7f5bdecd19110927fd8510008542904 gcc-gnat-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 827b85a1f02d2fa031ede7f1337ab8c6 gcc-java-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 45341e07eb7828276f75ebca2104f4b7 gcc-objc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 1a68d123353a302d0fdb6356910cca43 gcc-objc++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 6656c1b8c515a451556cb8136c2eb391 libgcc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 5c17a2d964b19428c1660a5306110107 libgcj-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 07f32a1fc3769ce0f138cae584e05a24 libgcj-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 72ef255fb5cb744e08e53358b1428336 libgcj-src-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 9db8edd06d4a64a665d1bd3b8f55309a libgfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 3bd3b3e6965e32699f82e95ee36b4697 libgnat-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm bd34e570ef6525459fd0a205b2d43547 libmudflap-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 250e4ecdb192699244033000d38007be libmudflap-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 4e2da968723faa5c2e78ce8c81cc3346 libobjc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm c2583ad254d639f820e0b2594430db96 libstdc++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 121f46b683d24a23783a8660ab19c02a libstdc++-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm Source: 9c93513a48170b999bf6c4aa5be6e206 gcc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:58:42 +0000 From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2010:0039 Moderate CentOS 5 x86_64 gcc Update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20100114125842.GA3291(a)chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2010:0039 Moderate Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0039.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 974d27def9772e424700074459935c1f cpp-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm e6638eaeb51d70acc8128c519088fe61 gcc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 67742532682d2047042a14d67718877d gcc-c++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 2722a3993f130c4db1c1c9e1aa61b6d7 gcc-gfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 9783f6ee8aa1ee004993b091ccb3fff2 gcc-gnat-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm fa4b92cd5895f4c119d6060f911706e6 gcc-java-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 0f4fef6bfebf0b3a968a36a6beaa3f53 gcc-objc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm e672d2ac33f097e15be72d4496dbc7ae gcc-objc++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 6e0ed17da32aacc26dde8b3523a4d13c libgcc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 36cee10846448b5b64fef295ebed0e38 libgcc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 0fb54147bf3a79d1e68e3b82ae40bd20 libgcj-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm a20923f25fee6ae1d713aa6c53399e47 libgcj-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 69746869f13a913df3c360e3570f6c51 libgcj-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 04b5ffc2752e70456617e3225974283a libgcj-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm a0042ba7c13d5de3991cae28f049ce0a libgcj-src-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 2d50c14a553be0da95515daac697435d libgfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 976b921a281cf5c623843901e76c634d libgfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm ce041e76484f00459a76134e4127120a libgnat-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 8c041cbc179ecd772ab4e2b2defb42f8 libgnat-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 795e196934185ab295669d5ceef31211 libmudflap-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 6a5214191870265bb2de040ce00b4ade libmudflap-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 47f54b736a9719193489e686f9deecbd libmudflap-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm ed87733a08c34fd903b41c12674e52c9 libmudflap-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 337baefc27c70ce9609d223c04d6c7f6 libobjc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm 6434651eb0bedf00568bd1ecf2d75847 libobjc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 9df3bd7d1547322920edc180b1da397a libstdc++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm ababd9dda6a8b7cc1eff1f5956a7af43 libstdc++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm 140ac8f889e76a36a0d62cb61b4c6a7f libstdc++-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.i386.rpm fafb82178bd90f65f6bf4f098d1f1d9d libstdc++-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm Source: 9c93513a48170b999bf6c4aa5be6e206 gcc-4.1.2-46.el5_4.2.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: z00dax, #centos(a)irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 59, Issue 5 **********************************************

1 0

← Newer
1
...
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
...
33
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss January 2010