Yes, the entire install will be done from a box using this controller and 10 SATA HDDs. Probably will load a mirror from two disks partitions to have some fault tolerance them do the rest of my partitions using LVM. Just having a difficult time loading the LSi driver from the loading process. I wish this can be done from a USB stick since the machine does not have a floppy.
>>> "Joseph L. Casale" 12/14/10 3:56 PM >>>
>I am sorry but I didn't understood much of your comment, can you brake it down further step by step...I am doing baby steps in centos.
Are you installing CentOS to boot off this controller, yes or no?
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS(a)centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi all,
Somebody knows how can I bind rsyslogd to a specific ip adress?? I have two
different interfaces on a centos5.5 host and I need to bind rsyslog to only one.
Thanks.
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
Joseph,
I am sorry but I didn't understood much of your comment, can you brake it down further step by step...I am doing baby steps in centos.
>>> "Joseph L. Casale" 12/14/10 2:52 PM >>>
>Can someone guide me on how to load the drivers so the OS can see the controller as it loads.
Download the driver, you get a dd disk for new installs when your root boots off the controller
and an rpm can you use after, and or if the controller is not backing your root.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS(a)centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
hello list!
I am attempting to setup haproxy using a shared up I am trying to
setup using the heartbeat package that I currently have installed:
[root@VIRTCENT01:~]#rpm -qa | grep heartbeat | grep -v -e stonith -e pils
heartbeat-2.1.4-11.el5
heartbeat-2.1.4-11.el5
I have /etc/ha/.d authkeys setup this way:
#
auth 2
#1 crc
2 sha1 {SHA}secret
I have /etc/ha.d/resources setup like this:
VIRTCENT01.summitnjhome.com 192.168.1.23
And I have /etc/ha.cf setup like this:
# What UDP port to use for udp or ppp-udp communication?
#
udpport 694
bcast eth0
mcast eth0 225.0.0.1 694 1 0
ucast eth0 192.168.1.200
# What interfaces to heartbeat over?
udp eth0
#
# Facility to use for syslog()/logger (alternative to log/debugfile)
#
logfacility local0
#
# Tell what machines are in the cluster
# node nodename ... -- must match uname -n
node lb1.summitnjhome.com
node lb2.summitnjhome.com
The service seems to start ok:
[root@VIRTCENT01:~]#service heartbeat restart
Stopping High-Availability services:
[ OK ]
Waiting to allow resource takeover to complete:
[ OK ]
Starting High-Availability services:
2010/12/11_22:03:55 INFO: Resource is stopped
[ OK ]
(tho I am unsure of that the INFO notice is of the resource being stopped).
And I have verified that it is running with ps:
[root@VIRTCENT01:~]#ps auxwww | grep heartbeat
root 3646 0.1 4.6 12260 12256 ? SLs 22:03 0:00
heartbeat: master control process
nobody 3648 0.0 2.1 5664 5660 ? SL 22:03 0:00
heartbeat: FIFO reader
nobody 3649 0.0 2.1 5660 5656 ? SL 22:03 0:00
heartbeat: write: bcast eth0
nobody 3650 0.0 2.1 5660 5656 ? SL 22:03 0:00
heartbeat: read: bcast eth0
root 3653 0.0 0.2 61180 736 pts/1 S+ 22:04 0:00 grep heartbeat
And verified that the box is listening on port 694 (the port that I
have set for heartbeat):
[root@VIRTCENT01:~]#netstat -tulpn | grep heartbeat
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:694 0.0.0.0:*
3649/heartbeat: wri
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:50550 0.0.0.0:*
3649/heartbeat: wri
However although I have the port enabled in iptables:
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m udp -p udp --dport 694 -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
COMMIT
An nmap scan does not see anything active on 694:
bluethundr@bluethundr-laptop:~$ sudo nmap -sT -A virt1
Starting Nmap 5.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2010-12-11 22:07 EST
Warning: Traceroute does not support idle or connect scan, disabling...
Interesting ports on 192.168.1.23:
Not shown: 997 filtered ports
PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
22/tcp open ssh OpenSSH 5.6 (protocol 2.0)
| ssh-hostkey: 1024 b0:gu:s (DSA)
|_ 2048 b0:gu:s (RSA)
80/tcp closed http
631/tcp closed ipp
MAC Address: 00:16:36:22:92:70 (Quanta Computer)
Device type: general purpose
Running: Linux 2.6.X
OS details: Linux 2.6.15 - 2.6.26
Network Distance: 1 hop
OS and Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect
results at http://nmap.org/submit/ .
Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 11.27 seconds
I am enclosing an archive of my /etc/ha.d directory in case this is of
use to anyone. I would certainly appreciate any help anyone could
provide!
Thanks!!
--
GPG me!!
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys F186197B
Dear All,
I got a new project to build cloud computing base on centos clustering
(clustering and cluster storage). whether failover, load balancing can
be applied?
I've read about CentOS clustering and cluster storage but I'm still
confused, any help or advice in this thread will be appreciate.
Cheers...
--
-
--
Best regards,
David
http://blog.pnyet.web.id
Dear CentOS,
I have recently upgraded several servers from CentOS4 to CentOS5 and I am
noticing a strange change to the stat() call. I have written a very
small program to test and show the behavior. I am calling stat()
against a file which is exported from my NAS and mounted with 32k
read/write sizes.
[dougalb@centos4 tmp]$ cat my_stat.c
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
if(argc != 2)
return 1;
struct stat fileStat;
if(stat(argv[1],&fileStat) < 0)
return 1;
printf("Block size: \t\t%d\n",fileStat.st_blksize);
return 0;
}
[dougalb@centos4 tmp]$
[dougalb@centos4 tmp]$ gcc -o my_stat.exe my_stat.c
[dougalb@centos4 tmp]$
[dougalb@centos4 tmp]$ ./my_stat.exe /mnt/nas/testfile
Block size: 32768
[dougalb@centos4 tmp]$
[dougalb@centos4 tmp]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 4.7 (Final)
[dougalb@centos4 tmp]$
[dougalb@centos5 tmp]$ ./my_stat.exe /mnt/nas/testfile
Block size: 4096
[dougalb@centos5 tmp]$
[dougalb@centos5 tmp]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS release 5.5 (Final)
[dougalb@centos5 tmp]$
On CentOS5 it is reporting 4k block sizes when it should report 32k. Has
anyone seen this or aware of what is causing this change in behavior?
Kind regards,
Dougal
Problems with a relatively new server: anyone have one of these, and if I
see ECC errors complaining about "node 2, core x", does "node 2" mean
board 2, or is that the third board, counting from zero, or...?
mark