Discuss November 2011

discuss@lists.centos.org

208 participants
156 discussions

CentOS 6: php-eaccelerator
by Reindl Harald 07 Nov '11

07 Nov '11

has anybody ever got eaccelerator working with open_basedir on CentOS? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751569 i wonder that the last build is more than a yaer ago and nobody hitted until now or nobody is secring his vhsost and so did not take notice about it http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=181336

3 7

Re: [CentOS] VSFTPD passive mode is not working
by Fawzy Ibrhim 06 Nov '11

06 Nov '11

Yes; it was an issue with Linux kernel 2.6.18-274.*.el5.centos.plus ; so I switched back to Linux kernel 2.6.18-238.19.1.el5.centos.plus and it's working now.

1 0

Re: [CentOS] School cloud solution
by Doug Coats 06 Nov '11

06 Nov '11

That is exactly the search criteria i needed! I had never seen the term before or at least didnt remember it. Thanks! Sent from my ASUS Eee Pad Toby Bluhm <toby.bluhm(a)alltechmedusa.com> wrote: >On 11/5/2011 10:43 PM, Doug Coats wrote: >> I understand what google docs offers but it comes with the need for an email address that i can not make students have, the inability for me to control who has access to which files, and no way to get teachers access without each student configuring that on their own. My teachers have enough to worry about. They will not use a solution that is more difficult then what we already use. Any solution has to be a clear upgrade with advantages for it to be adopted. >> Sent from my ASUS Eee Pad >> > > >Try a search for "document management system open source." > >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS(a)centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

2 1

Re: [CentOS] School cloud solution
by Doug Coats 06 Nov '11

06 Nov '11

I did look at alfresco but, like moodle, it has way more going on then I need. Sent from my ASUS Eee Pad Rajagopal Swaminathan <raju.rajsand(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Greetings, > >On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Doug Coats <dcoatshca(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >Your own instance of liferay/alfresco community edition exposed to >internet with the usual safegaurds perhaps... > >BTW, taking this example, what exactly are the usual "safeguards" >apart from enabling selinux in permissive mode and enabling firewall >with only http and ssh ports open? > >Some apps behave ugly in selinux enforcing mode. Any pointers? > >TIA > >-- >Regards, > >Rajagopal >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS(a)centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

1 0

[YUM] - Issue on package removal order on CentOS 5
by Olivier BONHOMME 06 Nov '11

06 Nov '11

Hello, I post here because I have an embarassing issue considering the yum version provided with CentOS 5. I am trying to package an application for CentOS. So I wrote my own specfile which is composed of declaration of various packages (main application and plugins for this applications). In that the configuration, the plugins RPM depends on the main application RPM because. Moreover, in all %postun blocks I execute a script which is provided my the main app RPM. My issue is that when I try to remove the packages with the yum remove command, the main app RPM is erased before the plugin RPM and in that case the postun scriptlets for the plugin fails because my script is not available anymore. As I read on the RPM and YUM doc, I used in the SPEC file the following instructions : Requires(post): mainapp >= %{version} Requires(postun): mainapp >= %{version} But even with this declaration, yum removes the RPM in bad order : Erasing : mainapp 1/2 Erasing : mainapp-plugin 2/2 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.48257: line 1: /usr/sbin/mainapp-setup: No such file or directory As a note, I say that I use a unique specfile for all my application. So is there a bug with yum or do I something wrong ? For now, I use an ugly workaround which tests the availability of the script in the postun block but I don't like it. Thanks in advance for your answers. Regards, Olivier BONHOMME

3 9

CentOS 6: /etc/init/start-ttys.conf ignored
by Reindl Harald 06 Nov '11

06 Nov '11

hi why are tty3-tty6 started after this config change? i would like to have only tty1 finally becasue on a virtual machine there is no need for the other processes since CTRL+ALT+Fx is caught by the own system and remote console mostly not needed at all [root@centos ~]# cat /etc/init/start-ttys.conf # # This service starts the configured number of gettys. start on stopped rc RUNLEVEL=[2345] env ACTIVE_CONSOLES=/dev/tty[1-2] env X_TTY=/dev/tty1 task script . /etc/sysconfig/init for tty in $(echo $ACTIVE_CONSOLES) ; do [ "$RUNLEVEL" = "5" -a "$tty" = "$X_TTY" ] && continue initctl start tty TTY=$tty done end script [root@centos ~]# ps aux | grep tty root 1626 0.0 0.0 4044 540 tty1 Ss+ 01:12 0:00 /sbin/mingetty /dev/tty1 root 1628 0.0 0.0 4044 544 tty2 Ss+ 01:12 0:00 /sbin/mingetty /dev/tty2 root 1630 0.0 0.0 4044 544 tty3 Ss+ 01:12 0:00 /sbin/mingetty /dev/tty3 root 1632 0.0 0.0 4044 540 tty4 Ss+ 01:12 0:00 /sbin/mingetty /dev/tty4 root 1634 0.0 0.0 4044 544 tty5 Ss+ 01:12 0:00 /sbin/mingetty /dev/tty5 root 1636 0.0 0.0 4044 540 tty6 Ss+ 01:12 0:00 /sbin/mingetty /dev/tty6

2 2

Re: [CentOS] School cloud solution
by Doug Coats 06 Nov '11

06 Nov '11

Thanks for all of your thoughts. I will look into gollem. The clients at school are windows 7. At home the clients might be any number of OS's. Eventually we might be using some sort of tablet devise probably Android based. Have any of you used Gollem? On Nov 5, 2011 8:16 PM, "Barry Brimer" <lists(a)brimer.org> wrote:

2 1

Centos Firewall - router with virtual IP
by Fajar Priyanto 06 Nov '11

06 Nov '11

Hi all, I haven't found anything in Google about this. I'm creating a firewall router with Centos with few virtual IP using iptables. May I ask for your experience? Is there any pitfall or bad side of using virtual IP for this purpose? I'm using few virtual IP to accommodate few subnets that go through this firewall/router. Thank you. Fajar.

7 12

CentOS Directory Server 8.2 for EL5
by Johnny Hughes 06 Nov '11

06 Nov '11

All, I have built all the new packages for the CentOS Directory Server (CDS) 8.2 for CentOS-5 and it currently resides in the testing repo at the following locations: http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/i386/RPMS/CDS/ http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/x86_64/RPMS/CDS/ If you are using the current CDS from CentOS-Extras (version 8.1), can you please test the 8.2 RPMS and let me know if they are working correctly so I can move them to Extras. You can reply to this thread on the message list or to this tacker on the bugs.centos.org server: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5230 Please help me get these packages into Extras. Thanks, Johnny Hughes

1 0

Odd ethernet interface
by Mufit Eribol 05 Nov '11

05 Nov '11

Hello, I have a CentOS 6 VM on a CentOS 6 host. This VM has two ethernet interfaces, eth0 and eth1. It was working nice. All of a sudden eth1 stopped working as expected. Kernel started to give the message below: kernel: udev: renamed network interface eth2 to eth2-eth1 There is no any eth2 or eth2-eth1 in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/. I really don't know where it is coming from. config -a: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:E0:5A:C5 inet addr:10.0.0.32 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:8293 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:6440 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:831687 (812.1 KiB) TX bytes:6358220 (6.0 MiB) eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:B5:B6:D1 inet addr:192.168.2.2 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:20 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:11 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:934 (934.0 b) TX bytes:462 (462.0 b) eth2-eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 52:54:00:B5:B6:D1 BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:37 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:37 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:3642 (3.5 KiB) TX bytes:3642 (3.5 KiB) And below is /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules: # net device () (custom name provided by external tool) SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="52:54:00:e0:5a:c5", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0" # net device () SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*", ATTR{address}=="52:54:00:b5:b6:d1", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth1" Here is the relevant excerpt from the xml on the host: <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='52:54:00:e0:5a:c5'/> <source bridge='br0'/> <model type='virtio'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/> </interface> <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='52:54:00:b5:b6:d1'/> <source bridge='br1'/> <model type='virtio'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x07' function='0x0'/> </interface> I really don't understand what is really going on. I would appreciate any help hint. All the best.

6 8

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss November 2011