Discuss February 2011

discuss@lists.centos.org

267 participants
209 discussions

Re: [CentOS] Unable to connect to wireless network
by leeodraper＠googlemail.com 04 Feb '11

04 Feb '11

Hello Jatin This might mean that you don't have the drivers for the wireless card installed. My laptop has a button that when press switches the wireless card on and a LED turns blue. If I don't have the drivers installed then the light does not turn blue. Lee ------Original Message------ From: Jatin Sender: centos-bounces(a)centos.org To: centos(a)centos.org ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] Unable to connect to wireless network Sent: 4 Feb 2011 16:15 Hi CentOS users I just installed the CentOS 5.5 version on my toshiba laptop. I did the configuration that i had for the wireless settings but still i could not connect to my home wireless network. So someone please guide me on how i can connect my laptop to my wireless home network. Thanks Jatin _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 72, Issue 1
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 04 Feb '11

04 Feb '11

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2011:0170 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 libuser - security update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2011:0170 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 libuser - security update (Tru Huynh) 3. CESA-2011:0180 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 pango - security update (Tru Huynh) 4. CESA-2011:0180 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 pango - security update (Tru Huynh) 5. CESA-2011:0181 Important CentOS 4 i386 openoffice.org and openoffice.org2 - security update (Tru Huynh) 6. CESA-2011:0181 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 openoffice.org and openoffice.org2 - security update (Tru Huynh) 7. CESA-2011:0197 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 postgresql - security update (Tru Huynh) 8. CESA-2011:0197 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 postgresql - security update (Tru Huynh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:41:22 +0100 From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:0170 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 libuser - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20110204104122.GA24321(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:0170 libuser security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0170.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/libuser-0.52.5-1.1.el4_8.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/libuser-devel-0.52.5-1.1.el4_8.1.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/libuser-0.52.5-1.1.el4_8.1.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum update libuser Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

yum confusion...
by John Doe 04 Feb '11

04 Feb '11

Hi, I just installed a new server and my final yum update fails... I have rpmforge and rpmforge-extras, but with yum priorities... # grep enabled /etc/yum/pluginconf.d/priorities.conf enabled = 1 # cat /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo | grep "priority\|^\[" [base] priority=1 [updates] priority=1 ... # yum clean all # yum list | grep "tcp_wrappers\|nfs-utils" nfs-utils.x86_64 1:1.0.9-47.el5_5 installed nfs-utils-lib.x86_64 1.0.8-7.6.el5 installed tcp_wrappers.i386 7.6-40.7.el5 installed tcp_wrappers.x86_64 7.6-40.7.el5 installed nfs-utils-lib.i386 1.0.8-7.6.el5 base nfs-utils-lib-devel.i386 1.0.8-7.6.el5 base nfs-utils-lib-devel.x86_64 1.0.8-7.6.el5 base tcp_wrappers-devel.x86_64 7.6-57.el5.rfx rpmforge-extras tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el5.rfx rpmforge-extras # yum update ... 132 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: tcp_wrappers for package: nfs-utils --> Processing Dependency: tcp_wrappers for package: nfs-utils ---> Package tcp_wrappers-devel.x86_64 0:7.6-57.el5.rfx set to be updated ---> Package tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 0:7.6-57.el5.rfx set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution 1:nfs-utils-1.0.9-47.el5_5.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: tcp_wrappers is needed by package 1:nfs-utils-1.0.9-47.el5_5.x86_64 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: tcp_wrappers is needed by package 1:nfs-utils-1.0.9-47.el5_5.x86_64 (installed) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest I removed tcp_wrappers.i386 # yum list | grep "tcp_wrappers\|nfs-utils" nfs-utils.x86_64 1:1.0.9-47.el5_5 installed nfs-utils-lib.x86_64 1.0.8-7.6.el5 installed tcp_wrappers.x86_64 7.6-40.7.el5 installed nfs-utils-lib.i386 1.0.8-7.6.el5 base nfs-utils-lib-devel.i386 1.0.8-7.6.el5 base nfs-utils-lib-devel.x86_64 1.0.8-7.6.el5 base tcp_wrappers.i386 7.6-40.7.el5 base tcp_wrappers-devel.x86_64 7.6-57.el5.rfx rpmforge-extras tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 7.6-57.el5.rfx rpmforge-extras # yum update ... 132 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: tcp_wrappers for package: nfs-utils ---> Package tcp_wrappers-devel.x86_64 0:7.6-57.el5.rfx set to be updated ---> Package tcp_wrappers-libs.x86_64 0:7.6-57.el5.rfx set to be updated --> Running transaction check ---> Package tcp_wrappers.i386 0:7.6-40.7.el5 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ==================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ==================================================================================================== Installing: tcp_wrappers-devel x86_64 7.6-57.el5.rfx rpmforge-extras 8.7 k replacing tcp_wrappers.x86_64 7.6-40.7.el5 tcp_wrappers-libs x86_64 7.6-57.el5.rfx rpmforge-extras 88 k replacing tcp_wrappers.x86_64 7.6-40.7.el5 Installing for dependencies: tcp_wrappers i386 7.6-40.7.el5 base 109 k nfs-utils insists on reinstalling tcp_wrappers.i386, and priorities apparently does not protect the CentOS packages... If I disable rpmforge, I get "No Packages marked for Update", but still have "7 packages excluded due to repository priority protections" If I also disable priorities, I just get "No Packages marked for Update" # ll /etc/yum.repos.d/ total 28 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2412 Jan 27 14:38 CentOS-Base.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 626 Apr 26 2010 CentOS-Media.repo -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 739 Nov 13 04:55 mirrors-rpmforge -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 717 Nov 13 04:55 mirrors-rpmforge-extras -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 728 Nov 13 04:55 mirrors-rpmforge-testing -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1113 Feb 2 17:15 rpmforge.repo Any idea what is going on or how I can clean up this mess...? Do you have to block all i386 packages? Thx, JD

5 6

Directions please..
by Hal Davison 04 Feb '11

04 Feb '11

Greetings... OS: CentOS 5.5 Attempting to run a database, PROGRESS, give the error: error wile loading shared libraries: libstdc++libc6.2.2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I am relatively a noob at CentOS. So you kind assistance in pointing me in the correct direction would be appreciated. --Hal. -- Hal Davison Observe Goal, Set the course, Burn the map Davison Consulting This correspondence was composed using Dragon Speaking Version 10 Peg#: 2007011701

6 9

Recovering LVM volumes
by Sanjay Arora 04 Feb '11

04 Feb '11

Hello all I have two sets of eIDE hard drives from earlier servers, one centos & one fedora. Both were LVM volumes with three or four physical disks, with ext3 fs. One disk, maybe even the boot one may even be missing, either from one or both sets and we do not know the disk order. I got these left from an earlier sysadmin who left the company & nobody know what's what. I need to recover data so I need to backup each of the disks to a disk image file first, then find block-size/recover lvm metadata on the volume, mount the volume to my current server and recover whatever files can be recovered manually. My question is: - what switches to be used with dd in creating the image, so that I retain the lvm disk data, for future recovery, if I mess up the recovery job? Can you please give the actual command assuming disk is connected at /dev/sdb? - How do I find the blocksize used by the disk & how do I get the meta-data and mount the disk to current lvm fs. Request please give me step by step process. I am finding the howtos & examples on the net very daunting as most of them have co-issues of raid etc. Mine is a plain lvm spanning multiple disks. I don't have expertise of this level & suddenly my boss is expecting me to perform a miracle. Please help. With best regards. Sanjay.

4 5

Does anybody know a PeerGuardian like app?
by S Mathias 04 Feb '11

04 Feb '11

Are there any programs blocking ip, and has frequently updated lists, like the peerguardian on windows? sorry for the question, but i looking for this kind of application :O Thank you, and a happy christmas!

6 5

LSI MegaRAID 320-2E PCIe RAID Controller
by Hugh E Cruickshank 04 Feb '11

04 Feb '11

Hi All: Has anyone tried using an LSI MegaRAID 320-2E PCIe RAID Controller in an HP DL380G5 (of any HP G5 DL for that matter) running CentOS 5? It looks like it should work but it would be nice to know that someone has already done it before I start going to all the effort and expense of building the box. I have a spare DL380 and a couple of IBM EXP400 disk arrays that I would like to configure as a backup database server. Any and all comments will be appreciated. Regards, Hugh -- Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com

4 11

filter unwanted email
by testwreq wreq 04 Feb '11

04 Feb '11

I am new to CentOS. How do I set a rule to so that any email coming from @ linkedin.com (and other abused locations), going to an application RT (setup on the system), will get rejected or dropped silently.

7 7

Lost root access
by James Bensley 04 Feb '11

04 Feb '11

So on a virtual server the root password was no longer working (as in I couldn't ssh in anymore). Only I and one other know it and neither of us have changed it. No other account had the correct privileges to correct this so I'm wondering, if I had mounted that vdi as a secondary device on another VM, browsed the file system and delete /etc/shadow would this have wiped all users passwords meaning I could regain access again? (This is past tense because its sorted now but I'm curious if this would have worked? And if not, what could I have done?). -- Regards, James. http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/ There are 10 kinds of people in the world; Those who understand Vigesimal, and J others...?

10 17

CentOS 4.8
by Y. K. Liu 03 Feb '11

03 Feb '11

Hi, I installed CentOS 4.8 (not CentOS 5) on VMware Fusion using an ISO file I downloaded. During the installation, it asked me to enter a user name and its password. I tried to enter root for the user name, but it would not let me do that. So I had to enter a non-root user name. So I did not have the root user name and password when the installation completed. I only had a non-privileged user name, and could not do any sudo work. How can I solve this problem? I noticed that CentOS 5 (not the 4.8 I needed to install) asking to enter the password for root during the installation. But I need to install CentOS 4.8, not 5. Thank you. Jerry

5 6

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss February 2011