Discuss June 2011

discuss@lists.centos.org

206 participants
141 discussions

Still having umask problems [resend]
by Todd Cary 27 Jun '11

27 Jun '11

I have the samba problems solved thanks to the help of folks on this forum, but I do not have the php umask problems solved. The www directory is /var/www/html and the html directory is owned by apache and is in the apache groups with the following permissions: drwxrwsr-- A sub-driectory, /var/www/html/viewpoints has the same attributes as the html directory, however when php creates a directory within /var/www/html/viewpoints, the permissions are drwxr-sr-x My goal is to have any created directories and files to have 774 permissions. What am I missing? Todd -- Ariste Software Petaluma, CA 94952 http://www.aristesoftware.com

2 1

Does anyone using dm-cache?
by Rudi Ahlers 26 Jun '11

26 Jun '11

Hi, Has, or does, anyone use dm-cache - specifically for caching SAN based storage locally? I'm looking for a way to speed up SAN based storage on a CentOS 5.6 + XEN Hypervisor which uses iSCSI mounted SAN storage. dm-cache seems like it do the trick, but I've never heard of it before until someone mentioned it in another mailing list. A quick search on google didn't really give me much in terms of actual user experience. Does anyone use it? Any feedback? Pitfalls? Success stories? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532

3 3

Still having umask problems
by Todd Cary 26 Jun '11

26 Jun '11

1 0

sendmail - smtp security/authentication & port 587 issues
by Max Pyziur 26 Jun '11

26 Jun '11

Greetings, I'm refining a CentOs configuration installation, now just over one month old running on a colocated production server. Previously, we ran a version of Fedora for over seven years. Specifically, I'm reviewing our sendmail configuration, both with respect to authentication and port usage. Previously, we had the following line in the sendmail.mc line: define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS', `DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN')dnl To authenticate, users would first have to POP their mail. A klunky script would scan appropriate log files and copy relevant IP addresses to the /etc/mail/access file that would be regenerated every 5 minutes via cron. Once the IP address was in the /etc/mail/access.db a user could be authenticated and be allowed to send email using the machine as smtp. Is there a better way of doing this? Port 587 issues: Verizon DSL filters out requests on port 25 to smtp servers not belonging to verizon.net. An alternative is to use port 587 for smtp purposes. Are there any views in this CentOs user community on this? Much thanks. Max Pyziur pyz(a)brama.com

3 4

Jumbo frames problem with Realtek NICs?
by Emmanuel Noobadmin 26 Jun '11

26 Jun '11

I was trying to do some performance testing between using iSCSI on the host as a diskfile to a guest vs the VM guest using the iSCSI device directly. However, in the process of trying to establish a baseline performance figure, I started increasing the MTU settings on the PCI-express NICs with RTL8168B chips. First bottleneck was discovering the max MTU allowed on these is 7K instead of 9K but googling seems to indicate that the RTL8168B is only capable of 4K frames. I assumed 4K would still be better than nothing but unfortunately bumping up the MTU to anything else but 1.5K caused the file transfers (using NFS for easy testing), to hang at random points or more accurate slow to a crawl. Checking the syslog, I discovered warnings that increasing MTU with this adapter may cause problems. Searching around, it seems to be a common problem but there doesn't appear to be any clear cut fix, including some suggestions to use a third party driver. Does anybody know of a proven solution or is the Realtek chip itself irrevocably broken/bugged that anything above the default 1500 will simply not work?

7 20

Strange issue's with LDAP and too many open files
by Sebastiaan Koetsier | proserve 26 Jun '11

26 Jun '11

Hi All, I've been growing a large headache on this one, i have a number of LDAP servers behind loadbalancing, since 2 days i constantly get the error: Too many open files. Although I'm not a newbie with linux I'm unable to resolve this, I have took the following stept: Changed the /proc/sys/fs/file-max to 65535 Added the following configuration to /etc/security/limits.conf: ldap soft nofile 65535 ldap hard nofile 65535 ldap - nofile 65535 # End of file If I su to the ldap user where the process is running under: [root@ldap5 ~]# su -m ldap bash: /root/.bashrc: Permission denied bash-3.2$ ulimit -H -n 65535 bash-3.2$ ulimit -S -n 65535 And still I get the error: Too many open files when open files are >1024. I'm bazzled. If anyone can provide me with some tips, please. Cheers, Sebastiaan.

3 5

Shared object packaging in rpm
by Joseph L. Casale 25 Jun '11

25 Jun '11

I whipped up a quick spec to package Zenoss' wmi client and noticed it creates a libasync_wmi_lib.so.0 and libasync_wmi_lib.so.0.0.1 that their python script would otherwise copy during its install routine (obviously I wrote a native rpm section for installation). Anyone know the naming convention associated with so's when they get compiled, what is the .0.1 extra file used for, they are slightly different. Thanks, jlc

3 4

Good Centos Security Advice & Gnome Thumbnails
by Always Learning 25 Jun '11

25 Jun '11

Browsing the net for one thing unexpectedly brought me to two good and useful documents: (1) Guide to the Secure Configuration of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 http://www.nsa.gov/ia/_files/os/redhat/rhel5-guide-i731.pdf Revision 4.1 February 28, 2011 (2) Hardening Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/files/hardening-rhel5.pdf Updated 12 August 2010 Gnome Thumbnail system is mentioned in (1) as dangerous. As many Centos/Red Hat installations use it, here is a brief extract from page 30. 2.2.2.6 Disable All GNOME Thumbnailers if Possible The system’s default desktop environment, GNOME, uses a number of diﬀerent thumbnailer programs to generate thumbnails for any new or modiﬁed content in an opened folder. Execute the following command to prevent the thumbnailers from automatically creating thumbnails for new or modiﬁed folder contents: gconftool-2 --direct \ --config-source xml:readwrite:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.mandatory \ --type bool \ --set /desktop/gnome/thumbnailers/disable_all true This eﬀectively prevents an attacker from gaining access to a system through a ﬂaw in GNOME’s Nautilus thumbnail creators. ------ I hate the thumbnailers, particularly as I have over 12,000 photographs on one machine and thousands more to be added. Eye of Gnome just ignores the 'thumbnail' off setting in Gnome. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU.

1 0

Using umask
by Todd Cary 25 Jun '11

25 Jun '11

Grasping a full understanding of setting default Users, Groups and Masks has alluded me over the years, but now I find myself in a situation where manually "setting" the file/directory attributes is becoming a pain. I understand the fundamentals of the file attributes, though from time to time I have to review the "sticky bit"; what I do not understand is where/how the attributes are set when a user creates or modifies a file/directory. Here is my situation: My /var/www/html files have been manually set by me to apache/apache 774. This allows my PHP applications to access the files, and I assume this is a "good" setting. Now, my server is connected via Samba to my desktop. If I create a file, it is todd/todd 744, so Apache cannot access them. If PHP (Apache) creates or modifies a file, it is apache/apache 755, so I cannot access them (Write/Delete). Is there a way to resolve this? When I FTP to a friend's rent-a-server, I can read/write/delete all of the files I have placed there *and* the same for files touched by PHP (Apache). My Linux Admin books as well as my Linux books do not appear to cover this and/or my experience is lacking. Todd -- Ariste Software Petaluma, CA 94952 http://www.aristesoftware.com

8 11

Firefox 5 on Centos 5.6
by Keith Roberts 24 Jun '11

24 Jun '11

So has anyone actually got FF 5 working OK on CentOS 5.6 i686 32 bit yet? If so, is it actually worth taking the trouble to upgrade to FF 5, and what is the recommended way to do this upgrade please? Kind Regards, Keith Roberts ----------------------------------------------------------------- Websites: http://www.karsites.net http://www.php-debuggers.net http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk All email addresses are challenge-response protected with TMDA [http://tmda.net] -----------------------------------------------------------------

3 2

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
15
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss June 2011