Discuss September 2011

discuss@lists.centos.org

268 participants
254 discussions

(c 5.6) Running 2 versions of Apache ?
by Always Learning 02 Sep '11

02 Sep '11

Just wondering how to run 2 versions of Apache on the same server, listening on different IPs and both on port 80. Does one give them, the httpd, different names and effectively duplicate most of the Apache set-up ? I use Apache;s virtual hosts facility for normal purposes but this is for a different project. Thank you. Paul.

7 21

CentOS 6 packages
by CS DBA 02 Sep '11

02 Sep '11

Hi all; does anyone know if the following packages are available (via yum) for CentOS 6 and if so which repo they come from? Thanks in advance... kmymoney darktable digiKam -- --------------------------------------------- Kevin Kempter - Constent State A PostgreSQL Professional Services Company www.consistentstate.com ---------------------------------------------

4 3

Yum Update Errors
by Lee Perez 02 Sep '11

02 Sep '11

Afternoon All, Just ran yum update and it burped on the following: Package xulrunner.i386 0:1.9.2.20-3.el5_7 set to be updated --> Processing Conflict: firefox conflicts xulrunner >= 1.9.2.19 firefox-3.6.18-1.el5.centos.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> firefox conflicts with xulrunner Uname -a gives: Linux 2.6.18-274.el5 #1 SMP Fri Jul 22 04:49:12 EDT 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux I have never had any troubles updating my box before. Anybody else seen this yet? Or what am I doing wrong. Just woke up, please cut me some slack. Thanks. Lee Perez

2 1

xmlrpc-c-client from CR repo requires curl >= 7.15.5-9.el5_7.4
by Yves Bellefeuille 01 Sep '11

01 Sep '11

The package xmlrpc-c-client-1.16.24-1206.1840.el5_7.4.i386 from the CR repository requires curl >= 7.15.5-9.el5_7.4, which isn't available. The most recent version of curl I see is 7.15.5-9.el5_6.3, also in the CR repository. Setting up Upgrade Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package xmlrpc-c-client.i386 0:1.16.24-1206.1840.el5_7.4 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: xmlrpc-c = 1.16.24-1206.1840.el5_7.4 for package: xmlrpc-c-client --> Processing Dependency: curl >= 7.15.5-9.el5_7.4 for package: xmlrpc-c-client --> Running transaction check ---> Package xmlrpc-c.i386 0:1.16.24-1206.1840.el5_7.4 set to be updated ---> Package xmlrpc-c-client.i386 0:1.16.24-1206.1840.el5_7.4 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: curl >= 7.15.5-9.el5_7.4 for package: xmlrpc-c-client --> Finished Dependency Resolution xmlrpc-c-client-1.16.24-1206.1840.el5_7.4.i386 from cr has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: curl >= 7.15.5-9.el5_7.4 is needed by package xmlrpc-c-client-1.16.24-1206.1840.el5_7.4.i386 (cr) Error: Missing Dependency: curl >= 7.15.5-9.el5_7.4 is needed by package xmlrpc-c-client-1.16.24-1206.1840.el5_7.4.i386 (cr) -- Yves Bellefeuille <yan(a)storm.ca> "La Esperanta Civito ne rifuzas anticipe la kunlaboron de erarintoj, se ili konscias pri sia eraro." -- Heroldo Komunikas, n-ro 473.

1 0

Scientific Linux 6.0 released (based on RHEL 6.0)
by Arun Khan 01 Sep '11

01 Sep '11

I know this is the CentOS list. However, as there has been some interest in CentOS 6.0 (RHEL 6), I thought I'd share the news here. Scientific Linux 6 is based on RHEL 6 with add-ons for scientific computing. FWIW, the Admin tools etc. are pretty much the same as in RHEL, so are the base packages. Read more at <http://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions/6x/60/> -- Arun Khan

9 10

Cannot start SSH at boot
by Dotan Cohen 01 Sep '11

01 Sep '11

On a particular CentOS 6 install, I must start SSH manually: # /etc/init.d/sshd start I have tried to configure it to start automatically: # chkconfig --level 3 sshd on However, it still must be manually started. I am not getting any errors. What might be preventing it from starting? Thanks. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com

5 8

Continuous releases and repository protection
by James A. Peltier 01 Sep '11

01 Sep '11

Maybe I missed something, but it appears that the CR repository is not compatible with yum priorities & possibly repository protection. I had priority=1 set on [base] and [updates] and no updates appeared. However, when I removed priority updates from cr became visible. Is this expected? Did I miss this announcement on -devel or such because I searched but couldn't find it. -- James A. Peltier IT Services - Research Computing Group Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus Phone : 778-782-6573 Fax : 778-782-3045 E-Mail : jpeltier(a)sfu.ca Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier I will do the best I can with the talent I have

2 2

PANIC: early exception 0e rip 10:0 error 10 cr2 0
by Rudi Ahlers 01 Sep '11

01 Sep '11

Hi all, I installed XEN on a CentOS 6 server, as per these instructions: http://www.crc.id.au/xen-on-rhel6-scientific-linux-6-centos-6-howto/ And the server now gives this error on reboot: PANIC: early exception 0e rip 10:0 error 10 cr2 0 These are the packages that were installed before the reboot: Total download size: 33 M Installed size: 116 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/14): PyXML-0.8.4-19.el6.x86_64.rpm | 892 kB 00:00 (2/14): SDL-1.2.14-2.el6.x86_64.rpm | 193 kB 00:00 (3/14): kernel-xen-2.6.32.45-1.x86_64.rpm | 20 MB 00:12 (4/14): kpartx-0.4.9-31.el6_0.3.x86_64.rpm | 37 kB 00:00 (5/14): libXdamage-1.1.2-1.el6.x86_64.rpm | 16 kB 00:00 (6/14): libXfixes-4.0.4-1.el6.x86_64.rpm | 19 kB 00:00 (7/14): libXxf86vm-1.1.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm | 18 kB 00:00 (8/14): mesa-dri-drivers-7.7-2.el6.x86_64.rpm | 1.5 MB 00:00 (9/14): mesa-libGL-7.7-2.el6.x86_64.rpm | 144 kB 00:00 (10/14): xen-4.1.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm | 1.0 MB 00:00 (11/14): xen-hypervisor-4.1.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm | 3.8 MB 00:01 (12/14): xen-libs-4.1.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm | 309 kB 00:00 (13/14): xen-licenses-4.1.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm | 63 kB 00:00 (14/14): xen-runtime-4.1.1-3.1.x86_64.rpm | 4.9 MB 00:02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 1.7 MB/s | 33 MB 00:20 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing : libXfixes-4.0.4-1.el6.x86_64 1/14 Installing : libXdamage-1.1.2-1.el6.x86_64 2/14 Installing : SDL-1.2.14-2.el6.x86_64 3/14 Installing : kpartx-0.4.9-31.el6_0.3.x86_64 4/14 Installing : mesa-dri-drivers-7.7-2.el6.x86_64 5/14 Installing : PyXML-0.8.4-19.el6.x86_64 6/14 Installing : libXxf86vm-1.1.0-1.el6.x86_64 7/14 Installing : xen-licenses-4.1.1-3.1.x86_64 8/14 Installing : xen-libs-4.1.1-3.1.x86_64 9/14 Installing : mesa-libGL-7.7-2.el6.x86_64 10/14 Installing : xen-hypervisor-4.1.1-3.1.x86_64 11/14 Installing : xen-runtime-4.1.1-3.1.x86_64 12/14 Installing : xen-4.1.1-3.1.x86_64 13/14 Installing : kernel-xen-2.6.32.45-1.x86_64 14/14 Added 'installonlypkgs' line to /etc/yum.conf! Installed: kernel-xen.x86_64 0:2.6.32.45-1 xen.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1 Dependency Installed: PyXML.x86_64 0:0.8.4-19.el6 SDL.x86_64 0:1.2.14-2.el6 kpartx.x86_64 0:0.4.9-31.el6_0.3 libXdamage.x86_64 0:1.1.2-1.el6 libXfixes.x86_64 0:4.0.4-1.el6 libXxf86vm.x86_64 0:1.1.0-1.el6 mesa-dri-drivers.x86_64 0:7.7-2.el6 mesa-libGL.x86_64 0:7.7-2.el6 xen-hypervisor.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1 xen-libs.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1 xen-licenses.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1 xen-runtime.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1 Has anyone seen this? the server is in a DC in America so I need todo everything over the internet from South Africa and the KVM is a bit slow. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532

1 0

CentOS 6, KDE 4: bad DNS traffic
by Michael D. Berger 01 Sep '11

01 Sep '11

On my new CentOS 6, KDE 4, running WireShark I see what appears to be frequent nonsensical DNS queries, for example: "settings-personal.desktop" and "settings-system.desktop". The DNS response is always:"No such name". Do tell! These appear especially when I click on things on the KDE menus. On my old CentOS 5 box, on the same LAN, I see no such thing. I note that I have replaced the original /etc/hosts with my own. Might these have been resolved in the original? Thanks for your comments. Mike.

3 7

Timeframe for httpd update (CVE-2011-3192)
by Timo Schoeler 01 Sep '11

01 Sep '11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, is there any time frame foreseeable for KB providing an update for httpd? Upstream provided their SRPM yesterday, i.e. Aug 31 19:40. [0] [1] It builds flawless on several machines I tried (Scientific Linux 6, CentOS 5 and 6). Question is: Should one deploy a self-build RPM or will there be an update in the next... "time"? (Given that 5.7 is still to be done, 6.1, etc., and due to the fact there is "no such thing as a CentOS community", as was discussed end of 2010/early 2011. That's why I'm *not* going to provide my diff -- I'm not willing to spend my work into an entity that denies transparency.) Cheers. [0] -- ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/httpd-2.2.3-… [1] -- https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1245.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFOX1tGfg746kcGBOwRAvAdAJ44tVJVjL2V6MPsSVNkUjC/JEvXMwCgvRSP Z08Y333AW1CYsrKcKlaDIFY= =2s2l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

5 7

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss September 2011